HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/7
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1146/2012
of 3 December 2012
amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are
subject to an operating ban within the Community
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
opened in the framework of Regulation (EC) No
2111/2005 and its implementing Regulation (EC) No
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
473/2006 ( 5 ), with competent authorities and air
Union,
carriers of the following States: Algeria, Aruba, Bang
ladesh, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the
Republic, China, Comoros, Cuba, Curacao, Egypt,
European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005
Ethiopia, Georgia, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali,
on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject
Nepal, Pakistan, Russian Federation, St Maarten, Ukraine,
to an operating ban within the Community and on informing
Yemen; Eritrea, Libya; Afghanistan, Angola, Benin,
air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and
Congo-Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of Congo,
Djibouti, DPR of Korea, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon,
repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE ( 1 ), and in particular
Ghana, Honduras, Indonesia, Iran, Jordan, Kazakhstan,
Article 4 thereof ( 2 ),
Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Madagascar, Mauritania,
Mozambique, Philippines, Rwanda, Sao Tome and
Whereas:
Principe, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland,
Venezuela and Zambia.
(1) Commission
Regulation
(EC)
No
474/2006
( 3 ) of
22 March 2006 established the Community list of air
carriers which are subject to an operating ban within
(6) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
heard
presentations
by
the Union referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC)
EASA about the results of the analysis of audit reports
No 2111/2005.
carried out by the International Civil Aviation Organi

sation (ICAO hereafter) in the framework of ICAO’s
Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP).
(2) In
accordance
with
Article
4(3)
of
Regulation
(EC)
No
Member States were invited to prioritize ramp
2111/2005, some Member States and the European
inspections on air carriers licensed on States for which
Aviation Safety Agency (hereinafter ‘EASA’)
significant safety concern(s) have been identified by ICAO
communicated to the Commission information that is
or for which EASA concluded that there are significant
relevant in the context of updating the Community list.
deficiencies in the safety oversight system. Notwith
Relevant information was also communicated by third
standing consultations undertaken by the Commission
countries. On this basis, the Community list should be
under Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, this will permit
updated.
to acquire further information regarding the safety
performance on the air carriers licensed in these States.
(3) The
Commission
informed
all
air
carriers
concerned
either directly or, when this was not practicable,
through the authorities responsible for their regulatory
(7) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
heard
presentations
by
oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations
EASA about the results of the analysis of ramp
which would form the basis for a decision to impose on
inspections carried out under the Safety Assessment of
them an operating ban within the Union or to modify
Foreign Aircraft programme (SAFA) in accordance with
the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air
Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October
carrier which is included in the Community list.
2012 laying down the technical requirements and admin
istrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to
Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European
(4)
Opportunity was given by the Commission to the air
Parliament and of the Council ( 6 ).
carriers concerned to consult documents provided by
Member States, to submit written comments and to
make an oral presentation to the Commission within
(8) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
also
heard
presentations
10 working days and to the Air Safety Committee estab
by EASA about the technical assistance projects carried
lished by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/1991 of
out in States affected by measures under Regulation (EC)
16 December on the harmonization of the technical
No 2111/2005. It was informed about the requests for
requirements and administrative procedures in the field
further technical assistance and cooperation to improve
of civil aviation ( 4 ).
the administrative and technical capability of civil
aviation authorities with a view to resolving non
(5) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
received
updates
from
the
compliances with applicable international standards.
Commission about the on-going joint-consultations
Member States were invited to respond to these
requests on a bilateral basis in coordination with the
Commission and EASA.
( 1 ) OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p. 15.
( 2 ) OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 76.
( 3 ) OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 14.
( 5 ) OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 8.
( 4 ) OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4.
( 6 ) OJ L 296 25.10.2012, p 1.

---

L 333/8
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
(9) Regulation
(EC)
No
474/2006
should
be
therefore
Comlux Aruba N.V.
amended accordingly.
(14) In
February
2012
the
competent
authority
of
Aruba
committed to introduce amendments in the national
legal system and to take administrative action vis-à-vis
(10) The
measures
provided
for
in
this
Regulation
are
in
Comlux Aruba to ensure that by 1 August 2012 the
accordance with the opinion of the Air Safety
operational control of this air carrier would be
Committee.
exercised from Aruba.
European Union air carriers
(15) In
order
to
obtain
updated
information
on
this
issue,
the
Commission, EASA and certain Members of the Air
(11) Following
the
analysis
by
EASA
of
information
resulting
Safety Committee conducted on 15 October 2012 in
from SAFA ramp checks carried out on aircraft of certain
Brussels consultations with the competent authority of
Union air carriers or from standardisation inspections
Aruba. These authorities informed and provided
carried out by EASA as well as specific inspections and
evidence that the flight operations legislation has been
audits carried out by national aviation authorities, some
amended to strengthen the requirements regarding the
Member States have taken certain enforcement measures.
establishment of the principal place of business in
They informed the Commission and the Air Safety
Aruba. These authorities also confirmed that the oper
Committee about these measures: Greece informed that
ational control of Comlux Aruba N.V. had been estab
the Air Operator Certificate (AOC) of Sky Wings was
lished in Aruba to their satisfaction. Changes in the
suspended further to the suspension of its continuous
organisation and accountabilities of this carrier have
airworthiness management organisation approval on
been implemented in that respect. Furthermore, the
7 October 2012; Luxembourg informed that the AOC
AOC was limited to one aircraft of type B767 and will
of Strategic Airlines was revoked on 8 October 2012 and
be renewed on a year basis only, subject to satisfactory
that the air carrier has ceased to exist; Spain informed
results of the continuous oversight to ensure that the
that the air carrier IMD Airways has successfully imple
organisational changes are effective.
mented corrective actions and remains on heightened
surveillance; and Slovenia informed that the AOC of
Linxair Business Airlines was revoked on 2 October
(16) The Commission noted the progress made by the
2012.
competent authorities of the Aruba and encourages
them to continue their efforts towards strengthening
their civil aviation oversight system in compliance with
Air Algérie
international safety standards.
(12) Having regard to the results of the ramp inspections
carried out in 2008 and 2009 on the aircraft operated
Air carriers from the Republic of Congo
by the air carrier Air Algérie in the framework of the
SAFA programme, the Commission had entered into
(17) All
air
carriers
certified
in
the
Republic
of
Congo
have
formal consultations with the competent authorities of
been listed in Annex A since November 2009. The
Algeria (DACM) in December 2009 as detailed in Regu
Commission and EASA held a consultation meeting
lations (EC) No 590/2010 ( 1 ) and (EC) No 1071/2010 ( 2 ).
with the competent authorities of the Republic of
These formal consultations resulted in the implemen
Congo (ANAC) on 12 October 2012, during which
tation of satisfactory solutions to redress the identified
ANAC presented the progress made to date in order to
safety deficiencies in the short term as well as in the
alleviate the safety concerns identified by the Inter
development of a solid corrective and preventive action
national Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) at the
plan by DACM and the air operator Air Algérie for
occasion of the audit carried out in 2008 in the
sustainable solutions. The safety performance of the air
framework of ICAO’s Universal Safety Oversight Audit
carrier Air Algérie continued to be verified through the
Program (USOAP).
results of the SAFA programme along with the monthly
reports sent by DACM to the Commission on the results
of their surveillance activities on the air operator as well
(18) ANAC
provided
the
Commission
with
evidence
of
the
as on the progress made in the implementation of the
expiration of the AOC of the air carrier Société
aforementioned corrective and preventive plans.
Nouvelle Air Congo and confirmed that the air carrier
has ceased its activities. Consequently, on the basis of the
common criteria, it should be withdrawn from Annex A.
(13) Considering the favourable trend observed on the results
of the SAFA inspections since November 2010, the
absence of serious safety deficiencies and the implemen
(19) ANAC
provided
the
Commission
with
information
indi
tation of the corrective and preventive actions in
cating that an AOC was granted to the following air
accordance with the planning, the Commission decided
carriers: Canadian Airways’ Congo, Eméraude, Equajet
in July 2012 to close the formal consultations with
and Mistral Aviation. However, ANAC did not provide
DACM under Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005
the evidence that the safety oversight of these air carriers
are ensured in compliance with international safety stan
( 1 ) OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 9.
dards, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed
( 2 ) OJ L 306, 23.11.2010, p. 44.
that these air carriers should be included in Annex A.

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/9
(20) The Commission noted the progress made by the
critical elements of their safety oversight system. In
competent authorities of the Republic of Congo and
particular, the competent authorities of the Netherlands
encourages them to continue their efforts towards the
Antilles did not have sufficient technical staff in the areas
establishment of a civil aviation oversight system in
of personnel licensing, aircraft operations, air navigation
compliance with international safety standards.
services and aerodromes to carry out their safety
oversight functions.
Air carriers from the Democratic Republic of Congo
(21) Air
carriers certified in the Democratic Republic of
(26) In
addition, following an assessment by the Federal
Congo have been listed in Annex A since March
Aviation Administration (FAA) of the United States
2006 ( 1 ).The competent authorities of the Democratic
under the IASA programme in September 2011,
Republic of Congo have taken the initiative of re-estab
Curaao and St Maarten were downgraded from
lishing active consultations with the Commission and
Category 1 to Category 2 because the FAA considers
EASA, indicating their firm intention of conducting a
that they did not sufficiently comply with international
thorough review and a complete overhaul of the
safety standards.
aviation industry as well as of the national regulatory
oversight authority.
(27) Finally,
ramp
checks
conducted
under
the
auspices
of
the
(22) The
competent
authorities
of
the
Democratic
Republic
of
SAFA programme ( 3 ) during the period May 2011 to
Congo informed that an AOC was granted to the
May 2012 identified findings amounting to an average
following air carriers: Air Fast Congo, Fly Congo,
of over one major finding per inspection.
Katanga Express, Katanga Wings, Mango Airlines, and
Will Airlift. However, since ANAC did not provide the
evidence that the safety oversight of these air carriers is
ensured in compliance with international safety stan
(28) As
a
result,
the
Commission
entered
into
consultations
dards, on the basis of the common criteria, it is
with the competent authorities of Curaao and St
assessed that these air carriers should be included in
Maarten and wrote to them in July 2012 seeking
Annex A.
details of what corrective actions had been put in place
or are being planned. These consultations are on-going.
(23) The
competent
authorities
of
Democratic
Republic
of
Congo have not provided evidence that the other air
carriers mentioned in Annex A have ceased operations.
(29) The
Competent Authorities
of both Curaao
and St
Consequently, on the basis of the common criteria, it is
Maarten responded to the Commission and detailed the
assessed that these air carriers should remain in Annex A.
corrective actions underway and planned to address the
ICAO and FAA audit findings.
(24) The Commission noted the progress made by the
competent authorities of the Democratic Republic of
Congo and encourages them to continue their efforts
(30) The
Netherlands
informed
the
Air
Safety
Committee
that
towards the establishment of a civil aviation oversight
they were active in providing technical assistance to both
system in compliance with international safety standards,
Curaao and St Maarten to assist them in their efforts to
while remaining committed to further develop the
establish a safety oversight system that is in compliance
constructive dialogue re-established recently.
with ICAO standards.
Air carriers from Curaao and St Maarten
(31) The Commission takes note of the actions by the
(25) ICAO
conducted
an
audit
of
the
Netherlands
Antilles
( 2 )
competent authorities of Curaao and St Maarten and
in 2008 and made a number of findings on all the
encourages them to continue with determination with
their efforts to address the shortcomings in their
aviation safety oversight system, failing which the
( 1 ) Recitals (60) to (64) of Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 of 22 March
Commission will be compelled to take action under
2006, OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 18.
( 2 ) In October 2010 the Netherlands Antilles (being part of the
Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. Member States will
Kingdom of the Netherlands) were dissolved and two new
continue to closely monitor, via prioritised ramp
countries were created: Curaao and Sint Maarten. The Kingdom
checks in the framework of the SAFA programme, that
of the Netherlands now consists of four countries: the Netherlands
the corrective actions are effective.
(in Europe), Aruba, Curaao and Sint Maarten. Curaao and Sint
Maarten are the legal successors of the Netherlands Antilles and
therefore share the same aircraft register (PJ). Since October 2010
( 3 ) CAA-NL-2012-30, CAA-NL-2012-154, CAA-NL-2012-155, CAA-
both countries have to organize their aviation safety oversight
NL-2012-156, CAA-NL-2012-161, CAA-NL-2012-162; DGAC/F-
system for themselves and each country has created its own
2011-1628, DGAC/F-2011-1640, DGAC/F-2011-2007, DGAC/F-
competent authorities. Because of the interdependencies between
2011-2329, DGAC/F-2012-230, DGAC/F-2012-231, DGAC/F-
the two countries, the cases are reviewed in parallel.
2012-603, DGAC/F-2012-693.

---

L 333/10
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
Air carriers from Equatorial Guinea
addressed. It was not clear whether that Eritrea had
requested an ICAO Validation Mission although they
(32) All
air
carriers
certified
in
Equatorial
Guinea
are
subject
are receiving support from the ICAO Regional Office
to an operational ban within the EU and listed in Annex
Safety Team. However, in view of the Air Safety
A since March 2006. The competent authorities of the
Committee, they failed to adequately demonstrate they
Equatorial Guinea (DGAC) provided the Commission
had taken comprehensive action to address all aspects
with information indicating that an AOC was granted
of the Significant Safety Concern. They were also
to the air carrier Tango Airways. As there is no
unable to provide clarity on the oversight arrangements
evidence of any change to the capacity of DGAC to
associated with the aircraft listed on AOCs issued by
ensure the oversight of air carriers certified in that
Eritrea which include wet leased aircraft from foreign
State in compliance with the applicable safety standards,
air carriers, a consequence of which being that these
on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
aircraft are listed on several AOCs, which does not
this air carrier should equally be added to Annex A.
comply with international safety standards.
Air Carriers from Eritrea
(38) Whilst
all
air
carriers
licensed
in
Eritrea
were
invited
to
(33) As
a
result
of
findings
identified
during
the
ICAO
audit
the Air Safety Committee, one of them, Eritrean Airlines
of Eritrea in November 2010 ICAO notified to all
made presentations to the Air Safety Committee on
Contracting States to the Chicago Convention three
21 November 2012. This air carrier confirmed that it
Significant Safety Concerns (SSC) in the areas of Oper
operates two aircraft of type A320 to Rome under a
ations, Airworthiness and Air Navigation Services. In
wet lease arrangement, without providing to the satis
addition, ICAO reported in its final audit report that
faction of the Air Safety Committee clarity on the oper
the lack of effective implementation of international
ational oversight and control of its operations.
safety standards amounted 79,9 %.
(34) Having
regard
to
these
results,
the
Commission
entered
(39) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee
into formal consultations with the competent authorities
acknowledge the efforts being made to address the
of Eritrea (ER-CAA) to seek details of what actions the
safety deficiencies in the civil aviation system in Eritrea.
ER-CAA had taken to address the safety deficiencies
However, on the basis of the common criteria, pending
identified by the ICAO audit.
the effective implementation of adequate corrective
actions to remedy the deficiencies identified by ICAO
and in particular the outstanding Significant Safety
Concern, it is assessed that the competent authorities
(35) ER-CAA
informed
the
Commission
by
letter
that
whilst
of Eritrea are, at this stage, not able to implement and
two Significant Safety Concerns concerning
enforce the relevant safety standards on air carriers under
Airworthiness and Air Navigation Services had been
their regulatory control. Therefore, all air carriers certified
resolved, the third Significant Safety Concern concerning
in Eritrea should be subject to an operating ban and
the certification process for the issuance of an Air
included in Annex A.
Operators Certificate had yet to be resolved and would
require a validation mission by ICAO for it to be
removed. However, ER-CAA submissions did not
contain any information concerning the corrective
actions undertaken to address the outstanding Significant
(40) Once the outstanding significant safety concern is closed
Safety Concern nor any information on the operational
to the satisfaction of ICAO, and the major findings of the
oversight of Eritrean air carriers, both of whom are auth
ICAO audit have been satisfactorily addressed, the
orised by Eritrea to operate into the EU.
Commission is ready to organise, with the assistance of
the EASA and the support of Member States, an on-site
assessment to verify the progress achieved and prepare a
review of the case at the Air Safety Committee.
(36) The Commission invited repeatedly the ER-CAA to
consultation meetings to seek further clarification of
the oversight of Eritrean AOC holders. However, the
ER-CAA declined to attend these meetings.
Rollins Air from Honduras
(41) The
competent
authorities
of
Honduras
requested
in
June
(37) The
ER-CAA
was
invited
to
the
Air
Safety
Committee
2012 the removal of Rollins Air from the safety list on
and made presentations on 21 November 2012. The
the basis of the suspension of its AOC. They provided
ER-CAA informed that their Corrective Action Plan had
evidence on 21 November 2012 that the AOC of Rollins
been accepted by ICAO and, as a result of amending
Air, which had been suspended for six months, had
their primary aviation legislation and promulgating a
expired and was eventually cancelled on 24 September
number of civil aviation regulations, considered on
2012. Consequently, on the basis of the common
their part that the Significant Safety Concern had been
criteria, Rollins Air should be removed from Annex A.

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/11
Air carriers from Indonesia
orities of Kazakhstan made several submissions, based on
which the Commission, assisted by EASA, held a consul
(42) Consultations with the competent authorities of
tation meeting on 17 October 2012. The competent
Indonesia (DGCA) continue with the view to monitoring
authorities of Kazakhstan were also heard by the Air
the progress of the DGCA in ensuring that the safety
Safety Committee on 21 November 2012 and made
oversight of all air carriers certified in Indonesia is in
presentations in that respect.
compliance with international safety standards.
(49) The
competent
authorities
of
Kazakhstan
reported
that
(43) On 18 October 2012 a videoconference was held
they are progressing in an ambitious reform of the
between the Commission, EASA and the DGCA during
aviation sector undertaken since 2009 with a view to
which the DGCA provided an update regarding certain
enhancing air safety. Following the adoption of a new
air carriers under their oversight. They informed that five
civil aviation code in July 2010 and the adoption of
new air carriers had been certified, namely Jayawijaya
more than 100 specific aviation regulations, the
Dirantara on 16 April 2012, Pacific Royale Airways on
competent authorities are now progressing in their
29 May 2012, Citilink Indonesia on 22 June 2012,
implementation. They are also progressing in their
Angkasa Super Services on 7 June 2012, and Air Born
capacity building with the establishment of a Flight
Indonesia on 6 March 2012. However, since DGCA did
Safety Assessment Centre and the recruitment of
not provide the evidence that the safety oversight of
additional qualified inspectors, to be continued in the
these air carriers is ensured in compliance with inter
coming months. They are also progressing in the recer
national safety standards, on the basis of the common
tification of aircraft and operators.
criteria, it is assessed that these carriers should be
included in Annex A.
(50) The
competent
authorities
of
Kazakhstan
informed
that
they continued to take enforcement actions. By order of
(44) In
addition,
the
DGCA
informed
that
PT
Sampoerna
Air
the Minister of Transport and Communications of 3 July
Nasantara had changed its name to PT Pegasus Air
2011 on the establishment of flight operations rules for
Services, and PT Nyaman Air had changed its name to
the civil aviation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, from
PT Heavy Lift, and that therefore their names should be
1 November 2012 onwards Soviet-built aircraft not in
amended in Annex A.
compliance with ICAO safety standards are not allowed
to operate anymore within the Kazakh airspace;
consequently the competent authorities of Kazakhstan
banned the operations of 7 aircraft of type Yak-40, 2
(45) DGCA
also
informed
and
provided
confirmation
that
the
aircraft of type Antonov 12, 5 aircraft of type Antonov
AOC of Dirgantara Air Service had been revoked on
24 and 1 aircraft of type Tu-134 ( 1 ).
25 May 2012. Therefore, on the basis of the common
criteria, it is assessed that this air carrier should be
removed from Annex A.
(51) The
competent
authorities
of
Kazakhstan
also
informed
the Commission that 5 air carriers had terminated their
operations and provided evidence that their AOC had
(46) The
DGCA
also
briefed
on
the
results
of
a
US
Federal
expired and were not renewed; these air carriers are:
Aviation Administration (FAA) assessment visit to
Asia Wings, Minas, Skybus, Skyjet and Sayakhat
Indonesia which took place in September 2012. Whilst
Airlines. Consequently, on the basis of the common
the FAA noted improvements in the aviation safety
criteria, these air carriers should be withdrawn from
oversight system over the past years, the FAA made a
Annex A.
number of observations and recommendations in relation
to inspector training, the surveillance of foreign aviation
activities, enforcement policy and procedures, particularly
concerning the use of fines, and the need to improve
(52) The competent authorities of Kazakhstan further
informed the Commission that 4 airlines previously
some local facilities. The DGCA agreed to provide a
involved in commercial air transport have ceased this
copy of the formal report of the assessment visit as
activity, reduced their fleet and have been recertified
soon as it became available.
under aerial work; these airlines are: Aero Aircompany,
AK Suncare Aircompany, Kazair West, Ust-Kamenogorsk
Air division of EKA. Consequently, on the basis of the
(47) The
Commission
and
the
Air
Safety
Committee
noted
the
common criteria, these air carriers should be withdrawn
sound progress made by the Competent Authorities of
from Annex A.
Indonesia and continue to encourage their efforts
towards completing their work of establishing an
aviation system fully compliant with ICAO Standards.
(53) The
competent
authorities
of
Kazakhstan
informed
that
by order of the Prime Minister no new AOC can be
granted until the competent authorities are in position
Air carriers from Kazakhstan
to fully discharge their responsibilities towards ICAO.
(48) Consultations with the competent authorities of
( 1 ) 7 aircraft of type Yak-40; 2 aircraft of type Antonov 12; 5 aircraft of
Kazakhstan have continued actively. The competent auth
type Antonov 24; 1 aircraft of type Tu-134.

---

L 333/12
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
(54) Air
Astana
was
heard
by
the
Air
Safety
Committee
on
orities of Kyrgyzstan, during which these authorities
21 November 2012 with the view to provide updates on
indicated that the Kyrgyzstan had adopted a new legal
its fleet which is currently undergoing a renewal and
framework and that the exit from the safety list was a
made submissions in that respect. They informed that
priority for the government.
several aircraft had been phased out and that new
aircraft are being phased in within the existing B767,
B757 A320 series and Fokker 50 fleets, fleets that are
(58) The competent authorities of Kyrgyzstan provided
already mentioned under Annex B. Air Astana stated and
information indicating that the following air carriers
provided evidence that the safety performance of its fleet
had changed their names: Eastok Avia into Air Bishkek
has improved. The competent authorities of Kazakhstan
and Dames into State Aviation Enterprise under the
stated that the operations of the aircraft currently on the
Ministry of Emergency Situations (SAEMES). Therefore,
AOC are subject to a certain continuing oversight. The
Annex A should be amended accordingly.
competent authorities of Aruba also provided evidence
that the airworthiness of the Aruban registered aircraft
currently on the AOC of Air Astana are subject to
(59) The
competent
authorities
of
Kyrgyzstan
informed
that
continuing oversight in accordance with international
an AOC has been granted to the following air carriers:
safety standards and that they are satisfied with the
Manas Airways, Supreme Aviation and Sky KG Airlines.
airworthiness standards demonstrated. In addition,
However, they did not provide the evidence that the
Member States and EASA confirmed that no specific
safety oversight of these air carriers are ensured in
concern arose from ramp checks carried out at
compliance with international safety standards. Therefore,
European airports in the framework of the SAFA
on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
programme. Consequently, in accordance with the
these air carriers should be included in Annex A.
common criteria, Annex B should be amended to
allow, within the current level of operations, the
operation of aircraft of type B767, B757, A320 series
and Fokker 50 that are or will be listed on the AOC of
(60) The
competent
authorities
of
Kyrgyzstan
provided
the
Air Astana provided such aircraft are registered in Aruba
Commission with evidence of the revocation of the
and the AOC and all changes thereto are timely
following AOCs: Trast Aero, Asian Air and Kyrgyzstan
submitted to the Commission and Eurocontrol.
Airlines. In addition, they informed that the AOCs of

Aerostan and Itek Air had expired and had not been
renewed. Consequently, on the basis of the common
(55) Member
States
will
verify
the
effective
compliance
with
criteria, these air carriers should be withdrawn from
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
Annex A.
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of Air
Astana pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Should the results of such checks, or any other
(61) Upon agreement with the competent authorities of
relevant safety information, indicate that international
Kyrgyzstan, the Commission remains committed to
safety standards are not being met, the Commission
organise, with the assistance of EASA and the support
will be forced to take action under the auspices of Regu
of Member States, a safety assessment mission to
lation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Kyrgyzstan to verify on-site the implementation of the
new rules and the satisfactory oversight of certain air
carriers certified in Kyrgyzstan.
(56) The
Commission
continues
to
support
the
ambitious
reform of the civil aviation system undertaken by the
authorities of Kazakhstan and invites these authorities
Air carriers from Libya
to continue with determination their efforts towards
the establishment of a civil aviation oversight system in
(62) Consultations
with
the
competent
authorities
of
Libya
compliance with international safety standards. To that
(LCAA) continue with the aim of confirming that Libya
end, it encourages these authorities to continue the
is progressing in its work to reform its civil aviation
implementation of the corrective action plan agreed
safety system, and in particular ensuring that the safety
with ICAO, focusing in priority on the two outstanding
oversight of all air carriers certified in Libya is in
Significant Safety Concerns and the recertification of all
compliance with international safety standards.
operators under their responsibility. Once those
significant safety concerns are closed to the satisfaction
of ICAO, the Commission is ready to organise, with the
(63) The LCAA, and representatives
of Afriqiyah, Libyan
assistance of the EASA and the support of Member
Airlines and Buraq Air, met with the Commission,
States, an on-site assessment to verify the progress
EASA, and certain members of the Air Safety
achieved and prepare a review of the case at the Air
Committee on 15 October 2012 to brief on progress.
Safety Committee.
The LCAA informed that they had taken regulatory
action by revoking the AOCs ( 1 ) of 16 of the 26
Libyan air carriers. They had employed consultants in
Air carriers from Kyrgyzstan
(57) The
air
carriers
established
in
the
Kyrgyz
Republic
have
( 1 ) International Company, Tobruk Air Transport, Awsaj Aviation
been subject to an operating ban since 2006. The
Service, Kalat Aleker Air Company, Alajniha Air Transport, Nayzak
Air Transport, Qurina Air Services, Libyan Air Cargo, Air One Nine,
Commission, assisted by EASA, held a consultation
Gulf Pearal Airlines, Horizon Airline, North African Air Transport,
meeting on 5 October 2012 with the competent auth
Madina Air, Assanad Aviation, Benina Air, Awas Aviation.

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/13
the short term and ICAO assistance in the long term to
time as a full five stage recertification has been completed
provide technical support, and that they were in the
and any significant findings closed, following which, and
process of recruiting a number of additional pilots and
in agreement with the Commission, individual air carriers
engineers to act as inspecting staff.
could be permitted to recommence commercial flights to
the EU, Norway, Switzerland and Iceland.
(64) The
LCAA
further
informed
that
they
were
embarking
on
a five stage recertification process of all Libyan air
(69) Furthermore,
for
each
air
carrier
recertified,
the
LCAA
carriers, commencing with Libyan Airlines and Afriqiyah,
committed to submit to the Commission detailed
and would report on progress and provide the audit
information on the recertification process and meet
reports when they became available. At the same time
with the Commission and Member States to discuss in
they would develop and implement an annual oversight
detail the relevant audits, findings, remedial actions taken
system to ensure continued compliance of ICAO
and closure actions, together with details of the plans for
standards by their air carriers.
continuing oversight before any relaxations of restrictions

are agreed. Should this information fail to demonstrate to
the satisfaction of the Commission and Member States
that the recertification process had been effectively
completed and a sustainable continued oversight is in
(65) The
Air
Safety
Committee
heard
presentations
from
the
place in accordance with ICAO standards, the
LCAA, Libyan Airlines and Afriqiyah on 21 November
Commission would be compelled to take measures to
2012. The LCAA stated clearly that unsafe operations
prevent air carriers from operating into the EU,
would not be tolerated in Libya. They confirmed the
Norway, Switzerland and Iceland airspace. If further clari
details provided at the meeting of the 16 October, in
fication is needed the Commission may decide to
particular that the investigation report on the Afriqiyah
conduct an on-site visit prior to any relaxation in restric
A330 accident would be published before February
tions.
2013, that the recertification process is planned to be
completed in the case of Libyan Airlines and Afriqiyah
by December 2012 and for the remaining air carriers by
December 2013. They also informed that they would
(70) For
air
carriers
that
are
subsequently
permitted
to
operate
continue to take enforcement action where necessary to
into the EU, the Member States will verify the effective
contain safety risks, as they did in the case of the
compliance with relevant safety standards through the
temporary grounding of an A320.
prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on
aircraft of this carrier pursuant to Regulation (EU) No
965/2012. Should the results of such checks, or any
other relevant safety information, indicate that inter
national safety standards are not being met the
(66) Libyan Airlines informed its safety management
Commission will be forced to take action under the
processes had been improved as well as the training of
auspices of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
its crew.
Air carriers from the Islamic Republic of Mauritania
(67) Afriqiyah
informed
the
Air
Safety
Committee
about
its
quality assurance system and the use of external training
(71) Air
carriers
certified
in
Mauritania
have
been
listed
in
Annex A since November 2010 (
organisations. The air carrier also stated that, as a result

1 ). The competent auth
orities of Mauritania (ANAC) have since then engaged in
of the A330 accident, the flight schedules were modified
active consultations with the Commission with the view
to reduce the risk of pilot fatigue, a pilot training
to update on progress made in the reform of the regu
programme on ‘go-around’ procedures was carried out
lation of civil aviation and made numerous submissions
and external expertise was brought in to assist in
in that respect. Two meetings were held with ANAC and
developing safety programmes. The air carrier also
Mauritania Airlines on 24 September and 10 October
expressed the desire to operate to Spain, France, the
2012. ANAC and Mauritania Airlines International were
United Kingdom, Italy, Germany and Austria, once the
also heard by the Air Safety Committee on 21 November
LCAA had lifted their current restrictions.
2012.
(68) The Commission and Air Safety Committee were
(72) ANAC informed that decisive actions were undertaken to
encouraged by the sound plan of the LCAA to address
reform the safety oversight system and that a number of
the safety deficiencies in their aviation system, the
achievement have already been obtained: in particular,
realistic timescales for actions, and the progress made
the establishment of a new civil air code, the
to date. They noted that the LCAA would retain the
current restrictions on each Libyan air carriers operations
( 1 ) Recitals (43) to (51) of Regulation (EU) No 1071/2010 of
into the EU, Norway, Switzerland and Iceland until such
22 November 2010, OJ L 306, 23.11.2010, p. 49.

---

L 333/14
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
amendment of the civil aviation legislation to align it
(77) ANAC
stated
and
confirmed
in
writing
that
Mauritania
with the Annexes to the Chicago Convention, changes
Airlines International does not intend to resume flights
to the ANAC’s management, structure and staffing and
to the EU in the short term, except to Las Palmas de
the establishment of a complete set of procedures for the
Gran Canaria (Spain) and not before February 2013.
certification and the continuous surveillance of air
carriers.
(78) The
competent
authorities
of
Spain
indicated
that
they
had provided technical assistance to ANAC and
(73) ANAC informed that they have taken effective
confirmed that they were satisfied with the flights
enforcement actions. ANAC confirmed in particular
resuming to Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
that the AOC of Mauritania Airways expired on
15 December 2010 and was not renewed as the air
carrier ceased its activity. ANAC also informed that the
(79) Member
States
will
verify
the
effective
compliance
with
certificates and derogations held by the air carrier Class
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
Aviation were revoked in January 2011.
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of air
carriers licensed in Mauritania pursuant to Regulation
(EU) No 965/2012.
(74) ICAO carried out two coordination and validations
missions (ICVM) in Mauritania in April and September
2012 to validate the progress made by the State. The
(80) The
Commission
intends
to
carry
out,
with
the
assistance
final reports stemming from these missions confirm
of EASA and the support of Member States, an on-site
that major progress has been achieved, with a 47 %
safety assessment visit to confirm the satisfactory imple
improvement in the overall compliance with inter
mentation of the measures taken by ANAC.
national safety standards. ICAO confirmed to the
Commission on 1 October 2012 the exceptional
progress made by ANAC. However, these missions also
(81) Should
the
results
of
ramp
checks
or
any
other
relevant
concluded on the need to continue the effective imple
safety information indicate that international safety
mentation of all corrective actions, notably with regard
standards are not being met, the Commission will be
to the surveillance obligations and the resolution of
forced to take actions under the auspices of Regulation
identified safety concerns, where ICAO reports the lack
(EC) No 2111/2005.
of effective implementation of international safety
standards reaches 51 % and 58 % respectively. ANAC
indicated it intends to pursue its actions with deter
Air carriers from the Philippines
mination to improve further the compliance with ICAO
standards.
(82) Air
carriers
certified
in
the
Philippines
have
been
listed
in
Annex A since 31 March 2010 ( 1 ). Consultations with
the competent authorities of the Philippines (CAAP)
(75) In its consultations with ANAC, the Commission
have since then been pursued with the view to obtain
specifically assessed the robustness of the safety
updates on progress made in the reform of the regulation
oversight of Mauritania Airlines International. Defi
of civil aviation. Several submissions were made and a
ciencies had been identified in the initial certification of
videoconference was held on 18 November 2012
Mauritania Airlines International as its AOC was issued
between the Commission, assisted by EASA, and the
on 8 May 2011 without providing evidence that the
CAAP.
non-compliance identified during the initial certification
of the airline, in particular the RVSM (reduced vertical
separation minima) authorisations, the lack of flight data
(83) CAAP
informed
that
ICAO
carried
out
an
on-site
coor
monitoring and the lack of ground personnel, had been
dination and validation mission (ICVM) in October 2012,
effectively rectified prior to the issuance of the AOC.
and gave a view on its preliminary results, which reveal a
However, ANAC and Mauritania Airlines International
7 % improvement in the overall compliance to ICAO
reported and provided evidence that all deficiencies
standards. However, the Significant Safety Concern
were resolved on 25 October 2012. ANAC also stated
notified by ICAO to all Contracting Parties to the
and provided evidence that the air carrier is now subject
Chicago Convention with regard to the safety oversight
to adequate continuous oversight in accordance with
of air operators would remain open and further safety
international safety standards.
concerns were raised by ICAO regarding the aircraft
registry.
(76) The
Air
Safety
Committee
welcomes
the
major
progress
reported by the competent authorities of Mauritania in
(84) CAAP
confirmed
that
AviaTour
Fly’In
was
involved
in
a
the rectification of the deficiencies identified by ICAO
second fatal accident on 18 August 2012, in addition to
and the resolution of the deficiencies identified in the
the fatal accident occurred on March 2012 ( 2 ). The CAAP
initial certification of Mauritania Airlines International.
did not respond adequately to requests for information
Taking into account the effective enforcement actions
by the Commission, failing in particular to provide
decided and implemented by ANAC with regard to the
other air carriers which are no longer in existence, on the
basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that all air
( 1 ) Recitals (74) to (87) of Regulation (EU) No 273/2010 of 30 March
2010, OJ L 84, 31.3.2010, p. 32.
carriers certified in Mauritania should be removed from
( 2 ) Recital (43) of Regulation (EU) No 295/2012 of 3 April 2012,
Annex A.
OJ L 98, 4.4.2012, p. 17.

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/15
information on the validity of the AOC of this air carrier
significant improvements achieved to date as well as its
which, according to previous submissions, was due to
open, cooperative and constructive approach in
expire on 14 August 2012, and on the on-going
addressing shortfalls identified in their procedures.
results of the accident investigations on both accidents.
While receiving confirmation that the existing procedures
for oversight can guarantee that the air carriers undertake
timely effective corrective actions in case safety defi
(85) Whilst
the
Commission
had
received
information
that
ciencies would be identified, the assessment team
the air carriers South West Air Corporation, Airgurus
identified however areas for improvements, notably
and Skyjet would have started commercial air transport,
with regard to the procedure related to the approval of
the CAAP did not respond adequately to requests for
Minimum Equipment List (MEL) as well as the one
information by the Commission, failing in particular to
related to the approval of the transport of dangerous
provide the AOCs of these air carriers together with the
goods.
complete operations specifications; the CAAP also failed
to demonstrate that the certification and continuous
oversight of these air carriers comply fully with the
(89) Since
November
2011
the
air
carrier
Jordan
Aviation
was
applicable international safety standards. Therefore, on
subject to heightened surveillance by CARC through an
the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
intensive focus on ramp inspections, en-route inspec
these air carriers should be equally included in Annex A.
tions, aircraft airworthiness reviews and Continuous
Airworthiness Management Organisation reviews.
Jordan Aviation was also assessed for compliance with
(86) The Commission continues to support the reform of the
Jordan Civil Aviation Regulations during an annual audit.
civil aviation system undertaken by the competent auth
The results of these audits pointed to a significant
orities of the Philippines and invites these authorities to
improvement in the field of the management of the
continue with determination their efforts towards the
continuing airworthiness. In addition, further to the
establishment of a civil aviation oversight system in
request of the air operator to add a new type of
compliance with international safety standards. To that
aircraft (Airbus A330-200) to its fleet, CARC proceeded
end, it encourages these authorities to continue the
with an assessment of the ability of Jordan Aviation for
implementation of the corrective action plan agreed
the induction of a new aircraft type. The variation of the
with the FAA and ICAO, focusing in priority on the
AOC was completed on 9 May 2012 and the Airbus
outstanding Significant Safety Concerns, the recertifi
A330-200 was added to Jordan Aviation AOC Oper
cation of all operators under their responsibility and
ations Specifications.
effective enforcement actions in case of safety concerns
or violations of the applicable legislation. Once the FAA
has modified its assessment of the Philippines compliance
(90) During the visit the assessment team was provided with
with international safety standards and all Significant
evidence of the effectiveness of the corrective and
Safety Concerns are closed to the satisfaction of ICAO,
preventive action plan developed and implemented by
the Commission is ready to organise, with the assistance
Jordan Aviation. Whilst the air carrier was able to
of the EASA and the support of Member States, an on-
demonstrate that the system put in place for
site assessment to verify the progress achieved and
management of continuing airworthiness is now
prepare a review of the case at the Air Safety Committee.
adequate to ensure the air carrier’s aircraft remain
airworthy, the team identified however areas for
improvement, notably with regard to the procedures
Jordan Aviation
for the operation of a new route and the crew planning.
(87) The
Commission,
assisted
by
EASA,
carried
out
a
safety
assessment visit to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
between 30 September and 4 October 2012 in order
(91) Following the request made by CARC and Jordan
to verify the satisfactory implementation of the
Aviation for the reassessment of the operating
measures undertaken by the competent authorities for
restrictions imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1197/2011
civil aviation (Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission —
and considering that the conditions therefore were met,
CARC) and the air carrier Jordan Aviation (PSC) to
CARC and Jordan Aviation were invited to make presen
address the safety concerns described in Regulation (EC)
tations to the Air Safety Committee. The hearing took
No 1197/2011.
place on 21 November 2012. During the meeting CARC
and Jordan Aviation also provided the details of the
corrective action plan set up to address the observations
made during the on-site visit.
(88) During
the
visit,
CARC
provided
the
assessment
team
with evidence of the effectiveness of its corrective and
preventive action plan developed and implemented after
the imposition of the EU operational restrictions on the
(92) The
Air
Safety
Committee
welcomed
the
improvements
air carrier Jordan Aviation. It also demonstrated that it
achieved by CARC and Jordan Aviation in the implemen
was now capable of discharging its obligations under
tation of international safety standards and considered
ICAO standards for the oversight of operators to
that further limitations of this air carrier are no longer
whom it had issued an AOC. The assessment team
necessary. Therefore, on the basis of the common
reported a credible commitment by CARC to
criteria, it is assessed that Jordan Aviation should be
implement its corrective and preventive action plan,
removed from Annex B.

---

L 333/16
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
(93) Member
States
will
verify
the
effective
compliance
with
Federation (FATA) and the air carrier VIM AVIA certified
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
in the Russian Federation to address the safety concerns
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of this
described in Commission Implementing Regulations (EC)
carrier pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
No 1197/2011 ( 1 ) and (EU) No 295/2012 ( 2 ).This safety
assessment included visits to FATA headquarters as well
as VIM AVIA headquarters, to the air carrier’s main
tenance facilities at Domodedovo airport and a ramp
Air Madagascar
check of one aircraft of its fleet. The results of this
assessment revealed that overall VIM AVIA has prog
(94) The
air
carrier
Air
Madagascar
is
subject
to
operational
ressed with the establishment of a safety management
restrictions and is listed in Annex B pursuant to Regu
system. With regard to VIMA AVIA’s corrective action
lation (EC) No 390/2011.Consultations with the
plans, however, it appeared that three out of the 12
competent authorities of Madagascar (ACM) and the
corrective actions could not be considered to be effec
Air Madagascar have since been pursued with the view
tively implemented. VIM AVIA was invited to review and
to get updates on progress made in the implementation
complete its action plan accordingly before resuming
of corrective actions.
flights into the EU.
(95) ICAO carried out a Coordinated Validation Mission
(99) On
20
June
2012,
FATA
informed
the
Commission
that
(ICVM) from 21 to 25 May 2012 which confirmed
the air carrier had been reauthorized, with effect from
some progress as the lack of effective implementation
that date, to fly to and from the EU on grounds that it
of ICAO standards was evaluated at 44,4 % down
had successfully completed additional corrective actions
from 70,7 %. However the mission also concluded on
related to these three areas.
the need to continue the effective implementation of all
corrective actions, notably with regard to the provisions
for the training and qualification of technical personnel,
the surveillance obligations and the resolutions of safety
(100) The Commission, after reviewing the additional measures
concerns where respectively 67 %, 58 % and 86 % of
reported, expressed concerns that the company could
ICAO standards were not effectively implemented.
have completed them effectively in such a short time.
The attention of the Russian competent authorities was
also drawn to the unsatisfactory results of a ramp
inspection carried out in Spain on 26 June 2012 ( 3 ),
(96) ACM
and
the
air
carrier
Air
Madagascar
requested
to
be
which pointed to deficiencies in VIM AVIA’s continuous
heard by the Air Safety Committee and did so on
airworthiness and maintenance departments. The Russian
20 November 2012. They presented the progress made
competent authorities were also invited to provide
in the implementation of their respective action plans.
information on a serious incident occurred to VIM
ACM also informed they have entered into a two-year
AVIA on 24 June 2012.
contract to obtain external technical assistance to support
their safety oversight. The Air Safety Committee took
note of the progress reported and welcomed the efforts
made by ACM to improve its capacity to fulfil its
(101) In view of the above, the Commission, EASA and certain
obligations with regard to the ICAO requirements.
Members of the Air Safety Committee held a meeting on
19 October 2012 with the Russian competent authorities
and VIM AVIA. VIM AVIA reported that corrective
measures had been undertaken and closed with regard
(97) The
Air
Safety
Committee
encourages
ACM
to
continue
to all open issues identified in the final report of the
its efforts towards resolution of all non-compliance
safety assessment mission in Russia carried out in June
findings identified during the ICVM audit carried out
2012 and provided evidence for closure actions after the
by ICAO and especially in the field of the surveillance
meeting. FATA informed that two investigations had
of the air operators certified in Madagascar. The
been opened following a serious incident occurred to
Commission, assisted by the EASA and with the
VIM AVIA on 24 June 2012 and provided a summary
support of the Member States, is ready to carry out an
of their conclusions.
assessment on site once the implementation of the action
plans by ACM and Air Madagascar has sufficiently
advanced.
(102) Spain confirmed to the Air Safety Committee that all
findings of the later ramp inspections performed in
Spain to VIM AVIA had been closed. Spain also
Vim Avia from the Russian Federation
informed about a meeting held in Madrid with VIM
AVIA representatives and noted the cooperative attitude
(98) The
Commission, assisted by the EASA and certain
of this company.
Member States, carried out a safety assessment visit to
the Russian Federation from 4 to 8 June 2012 in order
( 1 ) OJ L 303, 22.11.2011, p. 14.
to verify the satisfactory implementation of the measures
( 2 ) OJ L 98, 4.4.2012, p. 13.
undertaken by the competent authorities of the Russian
( 3 ) No AESA-E-2012-392

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/17
(103) Member States will verify the effective compliance with
continue their efforts in addressing the safety issues
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
and will continue to closely monitor the aviation safety
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of this
situation in Rwanda to ensure that any remaining safety
carrier at European airports. Should the results of these
concern is effectively addressed.
ramp inspections show a repetition of safety concerns
regarding the operations of VIM AVIA, the Commission
will be compelled to take action under in the framework
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Article 1
Air carriers from Rwanda
Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 is amended as follows:
(104) On 9 May 2012 the Competent Authorities of Rwanda
wrote to the Commission and provided evidence that
Silverback Cargo Freighters’ AOC had been revoked on
1. Annex A is replaced by the text set out in Annex A to this
30 October 2009. Therefore, on the basis of the
Regulation.
common criteria, it is assessed that Silverback Cargo
Freighters should be removed from Annex A.
2. Annex B is replaced by the text set out in Annex B to this
Regulation.
(105) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee notes,
however, that Rwanda remains subject to a Significant
Safety Concern issued following the ICAO USOAP audit
Article 2
in 2007 and notified by ICAO to all States Party to the
Chicago Convention. The Commission therefore
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its
encourages the competent authorities of Rwanda to
publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 December 2012.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Joaquín ALMUNIA
Vice-President

---

L 333/18
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
ANNEX
‘ANNEX A
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
BLUE WING AIRLINES SRBWA-01/2002 BWI Suriname
CONSORCIO VENEZOLANO DE
VCV-DB-10 VCV Bolivarian
Republic
of
INDUSTRIAS AERONAUTICAS Y
Venezuela
SERVICIOS AEREOS, S.A. “CONVIASA”
MERIDIAN AIRWAYS LTD AOC
023 MAG Republic
of
Ghana
All air carriers certified by the auth
Islamic Republic of
orities with responsibility for regu
Afghanistan
latory oversight of Afghanistan,
including
ARIANA AFGHAN AIRLINES AOC
009 AFG Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
KAM AIR AOC
001 KMF Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
PAMIR AIRLINES Unknown PIR Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
SAFI AIRWAYS AOC
181 SFW Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of Angola
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Angola, with the
exception of TAAG Angola Airlines
put in Annex B, including
AEROJET AO
008-01/11 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
AIR26 AO
003-01/11-DCD DCD Republic
of
Angola
Air Gicango 009 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
AIR JET AO
006-01/11-MBC MBC Republic
of
Angola
AIR NAVE 017 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
ANGOLA AIR SERVICES 006 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
Diexim 007 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
FLY540 AO
004-01
FLYA Unknown Republic
of
Angola
GIRA GLOBO 008 GGL Republic
of
Angola
( 1 ) Air carriers listed in Annex A could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not
subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/19
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
HELIANG 010 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
HELIMALONGO AO
005-01/11 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
MAVEWA 016 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
SONAIR AO
002-01/10-SOR SOR Republic
of
Angola
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of Benin
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Benin, including
AERO BENIN PEA
No
AEB Republic
of
Benin
014/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS
AFRICA AIRWAYS Unknown AFF Republic
of
Benin
ALAFIA JET PEA
No
014/ANAC/
N/A Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTTATP-
PR/DEA/SCS
BENIN GOLF AIR PEA
No
012/MDCTTP-
BGL Republic
of
Benin
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
BENIN LITTORAL AIRWAYS PEA
No
LTL Republic
of
Benin
013/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
COTAIR PEA
No
COB Republic
of
Benin
015/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
ROYAL AIR PEA
No
11/ANAC/
BNR Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTP-PR/DEA/SCS
TRANS AIR BENIN PEA
No
TNB Republic
of
Benin
016/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of Congo
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of the Republic of
Congo, including
AERO SERVICE RAC06-002 RSR Republic
of
Congo
CANADIAN AIRWAYS CONGO RAC06-012 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
EMERAUDE RAC06-008 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
EQUAFLIGHT SERVICES RAC
06-003 EKA Republic
of
Congo
EQUAJET RAC06-007 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
EQUATORIAL CONGO AIRLINES S.A. RAC
06-014 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
MISTRAL AVIATION RAC06-011 Unknown Republic
of
Congo

---

L 333/20
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
TRANS AIR CONGO RAC
06-001 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
All air carriers certified by the auth
Democratic Republic of
orities with responsibility for regu
Congo (RDC)
latory oversight of Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC), including
AFRICAN AIR SERVICE COMMUTER 104/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (RDC)
AIR FAST CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0039/2010
Congo (RDC)
AIR KASAI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0053/2010
Congo (RDC)
AIR KATANGA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0056/2010
Congo (RDC)
AIR TROPIQUES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
00625/2010
Congo (RDC)
BLUE AIRLINES 106/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 BUL Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (RDC)
BRAVO AIR CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
BRV Democratic
Republic
of
0090/2006
Congo (RDC)
BUSINESS AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
ABB Democratic
Republic
of
048/09
Congo (RDC)
BUSY BEE CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0064/2010
Congo (RDC)
CETRACA AVIATION SERVICE 105/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 CER Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (RDC)
CHC STELLAVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0050/2006
Congo (RDC)
CONGO EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
EXY Democratic
Republic
of
083/2009
Congo (RDC)
COMPAGNIE AFRICAINE
409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
CAA Democratic
Republic
of
D’AVIATION (CAA)
0050/2010
Congo (RDC)
DOREN AIR CONGO 102/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (RDC)
ENTREPRISE WORLD AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
EWS Democratic
Republic
of
(EWA)
003/08
Congo (RDC)
FilaIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
FIL Democratic
Republic
of
037/08
Congo (RDC)
FLY CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0126/2012
Congo (RDC)
GALAXY KAVATSI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
027/08
Congo (RDC)

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/21
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
GILEMBE AIR SOUTENANCE (GISAIR) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
053/09
Congo (RDC)
GOMA EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0051/2011
Congo (RDC)
GOMAIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
011/2011
Congo (RDC)
HEWA BORA AIRWAYS (HBA) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ ALX Democratic
Republic
of
038/08
Congo (RDC)
International Trans Air Business (ITAB) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0065/2010
Congo (RDC)
JET CONGO AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (RDC)
KATANGA EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0083/2010
Congo (RDC)
KATANGA WINGS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0092/2011
Congo (RDC)
KIN AVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0059/2010
Congo (RDC)
KORONGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
001/2011
Congo (RDC)
Lignes Aériennes Congolaises (LAC) Ministerial
signature LCG Democratic
Republic
of
(ordonnance No 78/205)
Congo (RDC)
MALU AVIATION 098/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (RDC)
MANGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
009/2011
Congo (RDC)
MANGO AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
034/08
Congo (RDC)
SAFE AIR COMPANY 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
025/08
Congo (RDC)
SERVICES AIR 103/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (RDC)
STELLAR AIRWAYS AAC/DG/DTA/TM/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
787/2011
Congo (RDC)
SWALA AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0084/2010
Congo (RDC)
TMK AIR COMMUTER 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
044/09
Congo (RDC)
TRACEP CONGO/TRACEP CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
AVIATION
0085/2010
Congo (RDC)

---

L 333/22
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
TRANS AIR CARGO SERVICES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
073/2011
Congo (RDC)
WILL AIRLIFT 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0247/2011
Congo (RDC)
WIMBI DIRA AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
WDA Democratic
Republic
of
039/08
Congo (RDC)
ZAABU INTERNATIONAL 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
049/09
Congo (RDC)
All air carriers certified by the auth
Djibouti
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Djibouti,
including
DAALLO AIRLINES Unknown DAO Djibouti
All air carriers certified by the auth
Equatorial Guinea
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Equatorial
Guinea, including
Cronos AIRLINES 2011/0004/MTTCT/
Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
DGAC/SOPS
CEIBA INTERCONTINENTAL 2011/0001/MTTCT/
CEL Equatorial
Guinea
DGAC/SOPS
Punto Azul 2012/0006/MTTCT/
Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
DGAC/SOPS
TANGO AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
All air carriers certified by the auth
Eritrea
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Eritrea, including
ERITREAN AIRLINES AOC
No
004 ERT Eritrea
NASAIR ERITREA AOC
No
005 NAS Eritrea
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of Indonesia
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Indonesia, with
the exception of Garuda Indonesia,
Airfast Indonesia, Mandala Airlines,
EkspresTransportasiAntarbenua,
Indonesia Air Asia and Metro
Batavia, including
AIR BORN INDONESIA 135-055 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
AIR PACIFIC UTAMA 135-020 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/23
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
ALFA TRANS DIRGANTATA 135-012 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ANGKASA SUPER SERVICES 135-050 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ASCO NUSA AIR 135-022 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ASI PUDJIASTUTI 135-028 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
AVIASTAR MANDIRI 135-029 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
CITILINK INDONESIA 121-046 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
DABI AIR NUSANTARA 135-030 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
DERAYA AIR TAXI 135-013 DRY Republic
of
Indonesia
DERAZONA AIR SERVICE 135-010 DRZ Republic
of
Indonesia
DIRGANTARA AIR SERVICE 135-014 DIR Republic
of
Indonesia
EASTINDO 135-038 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
Enggang Air Service 135-045' Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
Ersa Eastern Aviation 135-047 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
GATARI AIR SERVICE 135-018 GHS Republic
of
Indonesia
HEAVY LIFT 135-042 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
INDONESIA AIR TRANSPORT 121-034 IDA Republic
of
Indonesia
INTAN ANGKASA AIR SERVICE 135-019 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
JAYAWIJAYA DIRGANTARA 121-044 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
JOHNLIN AIR TRANSPORT 135-043 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
KAL STAR 121-037 KLS Republic
of
Indonesia
KARTIKA AIRLINES 121-003 KAE Republic
of
Indonesia
KURA-KURA AVIATION 135-016 KUR Republic
of
Indonesia
LION MENTARI AIRLINES 121-010 LNI Republic
of
Indonesia
MANUNGGAL AIR SERVICE 121-020 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
Matthew Air Nusantara 135-048 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
MERPATI NUSANTARA AIRLINES 121-002 MNA Republic
of
Indonesia
MIMIKA AIR 135-007 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NATIONAL UTILITY HELICOPTER 135-011 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia

---

L 333/24
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
NUSANTARA AIR CHARTER 121-022 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NUSANTARA BUANA AIR 135-041 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PACIFIC ROYALE AIRWAYS 121-045 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PEGASUS AIR SERVICES 135-036 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PELITA AIR SERVICE 121-008 PAS Republic
of
Indonesia
PENERBANGAN ANGKASA SEMESTA 135-026 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PURA WISATA BARUNA 135-025 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
RIAU AIRLINES 121-016 RIU Republic
of
Indonesia
SAYAP GARUDA INDAH 135-004 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SKY AVIATION 135-044 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SMAC 135-015 SMC Republic
of
Indonesia
SRIWIJAYA AIR 121-035 SJY Republic
of
Indonesia
SURVEI UDARA PENAS 135-006 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SURYA AIR 135-046 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TransNusa Aviation Mandiri 121-048 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRANSWISATA PRIMA AVIATION 135-021 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRAVEL EXPRESS AVIATION
121-038 XAR Republic
of
Indonesia
SERVICE
TRAVIRA UTAMA 135-009 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRI MG INTRA ASIA AIRLINES 121-018 TMG Republic
of
Indonesia
TRIGANA AIR SERVICE 121-006 TGN Republic
of
Indonesia
UNINDO 135-040 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
WING ABADI AIRLINES 121-012 WON Republic
of
Indonesia
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of Kazakhstan
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Kazakhstan,
with the exception of Air Astana,
including
AIR ALMATY AK-0453-11 LMY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AIR TRUST AIRCOMPANY AK-0455-12 RTR Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ASIA CONTINENTAL Airlines AK-0317-12 CID Republic
of
Kazakhstan

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/25
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
ATMA AIRLINES AK-0437-10 AMA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AVIA-JAYNAR/avia-zhaynar AK-067-12 SAP Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BEYBARS AIRCOMPANY AK-0442-11 BBS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BEK AIR AK-0463-12 BEK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BURUNDAYAVIA AIRLINES AK-0456-12 BRY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
COMLUX-KZ AK-0449-11 KAZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
DETA AIR AK-0458-12 DET Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EAST WING AK-0465-12 EWZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
LUK AERO (FORMER EASTERN AK-0464-12 LIS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EXPRESS)
EURO-ASIA AIR AK-0441-11 EAK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EURO-ASIA AIR INTERNATIONAL AK-0445-11 KZE Republic
of
Kazakhstan
FLY JET KZ AK-0446-11 FJK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
INVESTAVIA AK-0447-11 TLG Republic
of
Kazakhstan
IRTYSH AIR AK-0439-11 MZA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
JET AIRLINES AK-0459-12 SOZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
JET ONE AK-0468-12 JKZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIR JET AK-0442-11 KEJ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIRTRANS AIRLINE AK-0466-12 KUY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAVIASPAS AK-0452-11 KZS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
MEGA Airlines AK-0462-12 MGK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
Prime aviation AK-0448-11 PKZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SAMAL AIR AK-0454-12 SAV Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SEMEYAVIA AK-450-11 SMK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SCAT AK-0460-12 VSV Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ZHETYSU AIRCOMPANY AK-0438-11 JTU Republic
of
Kazakhstan
All air carriers certified by the auth
Kyrgyz Republic
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of the Kyrgyz
Republic, including

---

L 333/26
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
AIR MANAS 17 MBB Kyrgyz
Republic
Avia Traffic Company 23 AVJ Kyrgyz
Republic
CENTRAL ASIAN AVIATION
13 CBK Kyrgyz
Republic
SERVICES (CAAS)
Click Airways 11 CGK Kyrgyz
Republic
STATE AVIATION ENTERPRISE
20 DAM Kyrgyz
Republic
UNDER THE MINISTRY OF
EMERGENCY SITUATIONS (SAEMES)
AIR BISHKEK (FORMERLY EASTOK 15 EEA Kyrgyz
Republic
AVIA)
KYRGYZ TRANS AVIA 31 KTC Kyrgyz
Republic
Kyrgyzstan 03 LYN Kyrgyz
Republic
MANAS AIRWAYS 42 BAM Kyrgyz
Republic
S GROUP AVIATION
6 SGL Kyrgyz
Republic
SKY KG AIRLINES 41 KGK Kyrgyz
Republic
Sky Way air 39 SAB Kyrgyz
Republic
SUPREME AVIATION 40 SGK Kyrgyz
Republic
VALOR AIR 07 VAC Kyrgyz
Republic
All air carriers certified by the auth
Liberia
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Liberia.
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of Gabon
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of the Republic of
Gabon, with the exception of
Gabon Airlines, Afrijet and SN2AG
put in Annex B, including
AFRIC AVIATION 010/MTAC/ANAC-
Unknown Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
AIR SERVICES SA 004/MTAC/ANAC-
RVS Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
AIR TOURIST (ALLEGIANCE) 007/MTAC/ANAC-
LGE Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
NATIONALE ET REGIONALE
008/MTAC/ANAC-
NRG Republic
of
Gabon
TRANSPORT (NATIONALE)
G/DSA
SCD AVIATION 005/MTAC/ANAC-
SCY Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/27
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
SKY GABON 009/MTAC/ANAC-
SKG Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
SOLENTA AVIATION GABON 006/MTAC/ANAC- Unknown Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of Mozambique
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of the Republic of
Mozambique, including
Aero-Servicos sarl MOZ-08 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
Aerovisao de Mozambique Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CFA Mozambique MOZ-10 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CFM-Transportes e trabalho aereo sA MOZ-07 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
Emilio Air Charter lda MOZ-05 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
ETA Air Charter LDA MOZ-04 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
Helicopteros Capital MOZ-11 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
KAYA AIRLINES MOZ-09 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
Mozambique Airlines (linhas aereas de MOZ-01 LAM Republic
of
Mozambique
moambique)
Mozambique Express/MEX MOZ-02 MXE Republic
of
Mozambique
Unique Air Charter MOZ-13 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
Safari Air MOZ-12 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
VR Cropsprayers lda MOZ-06 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of the Philippines
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of the Philippines,
including
AEROEQUIPEMENT AVIATION Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AEROMAJESTIC Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Aerowurks Aerial SprAying Services 2010030 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIR ASIA PHILIPPINES Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIRGURUS Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Air Philippines Corporation 2009006 GAP Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIR WOLF AVIATION INC. 200911 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Airtrack Agricultural Corporation 2010027 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines

---

L 333/28
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
Asia Aircraft Overseas Philippines Inc. 4AN9800036 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Aviation Technology Innovators, Inc. 4AN2007005 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AVIATOUR’S FLY’N INC. 200910 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AYALA aviation corp. 4AN9900003 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Beacon Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
BENDICE transport management inc. 4AN2008006 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Canadian helicopters philippines inc. 4AN9800025 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Cebu Pacific Air 2009002 CEB Republic
of
the
Philippines
CERTEZA INFOSYSTEMS CORP. 2011040 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Chemtrad Aviation Corporation 2009018 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CM aero SERVICES 20110401 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Corporate Air Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Cyclone airways 4AN9900008 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Far East Aviation Services 2009013 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
F.F. Cruz and Company, Inc. 2009017 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Huma Corporation 2009014 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Inaec Aviation Corp. 4AN2002004 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
INTERISLAND AIRLINES 2010023 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Island Aviation 2009009 SOY Republic
of
the
Philippines
Island HELICOPTER SERVICES 2011043 SOY Republic
of
the
Philippines
ISLAND TRANSVOYAGER 2010022 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Lion Air, Incorporated 2009019 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Macro asia air taxi services 2010029 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
MID-SEA EXPRESS Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Mindanao Rainbow Agricultural Devel 2009016 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
opment Services
MISIBIS AVIATION & DEVELOPMENT 2010020 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CORP
NORTHSKY AIR INC. 2011042 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/29
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
Omni aviation corp. 2010033 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Pacific East Asia Cargo Airlines, Inc. 4AS9800006 PEC Republic
of
the
Philippines
Pacific Airways Corporation 4AN9700007 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Pacific Alliance Corporation 4AN2006001 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Philippine Airlines 2009001 PAL Republic
of
the
Philippines
Philippine Agricultural aviation corp. 4AN9800015 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Royal air charter services Inc. 2010024 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Royal Star Aviation, Inc. 2010021 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SKYJET Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SOUTH EAST ASIA AIRLINE INC. 2009 004 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
(SEAIR)
SOUTHERN AIR FLIGHT SERVICES 2011045 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Southstar aviation company, inc. 4AN9800037 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SOUTHWEST AIR CORPORATION Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Spirit of Manila Airlines Corporation 2009008 MNP Republic
of
the
Philippines
Subic international air charter 4AN9900010 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Subic seaplane, inc. 4AN2000002 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Topflite airways, inc. 4AN9900012 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Transglobal Airways Corporation 2009007 TCU Republic
of
the
Philippines
World aviation, corp. Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
WcC Aviation Company 2009015 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
YOkota aviation, inc. Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ZenitH Air, Inc. 2009012 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
Zest Airways Incorporated 2009003 RIT Republic
of
the
Philippines
All air carriers certified by the auth
Sao Tome and Principe
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Sao Tome and
Principe, including
AFRICA CONNECTION 10/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe

---

L 333/30
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
BRITISH GULF INTERNATIONAL 01/AOC/2007 BGI Sao
Tome
and
Principe
COMPANY LTD
EXECUTIVE JET SERVICES 03/AOC/2006 EJZ Sao
Tome
and
Principe
GLOBAL AVIATION OPERATION 04/AOC/2006 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
GOLIAF AIR 05/AOC/2001 GLE Sao
Tome
and
Principe
ISLAND OIL EXPLORATION 01/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
STP AIRWAYS 03/AOC/2006 STP Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSAFRIK INTERNATIONAL LTD 02/AOC/2002 TFK Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSCARG 01/AOC/2009 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSLIZ AVIATION (TMS) 02/AOC/2007 TMS Sao
Tome
and
Principe
All air carriers certified by the auth
Sierra Leone
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Sierra Leone,
including
AIR RUM, Ltd Unknown RUM Sierra
Leone
DESTINY AIR SERVICES, Ltd Unknown DTY Sierra
Leone
HEAVYLIFT CARGO Unknown Unknown Sierra
Leone
ORANGE AIR SIERRA LEONE LTD Unknown ORJ Sierra
Leone
PARAMOUNT AIRLINES, Ltd Unknown PRR Sierra
Leone
SEVEN FOUR EIGHT AIR SERVICES Unknown SVT Sierra
Leone
LTD
TEEBAH AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Sierra
Leone
All air carriers certified by the auth
Republic of Sudan
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Sudan, including
ALFA AIRLINES 054 AAJ Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALMAJAL AVIATION SERVICE 015 MGG Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALMAJARA AVIATION Unknown MJA Republic
of
the
Sudan

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/31
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence
ICAO airline
if different)
Number
designation number
State of the Operator
ATTICO AIRLINES (TRANS ATTICO) 023 ETC Republic
of
the
Sudan
AZZA TRANSPORT COMPANY 012 AZZ Republic
of
the
Sudan
BADER AIRLINES 035 BDR Republic
of
the
Sudan
FOURTY EIGHT AVIATION 054 WHB Republic
of
the
Sudan
GREEN FLAG AVIATION 017 Unkown Republic
of
the
Sudan
MARSLAND COMPANY 040 MSL Republic
of
the
Sudan
NOVA AIRLINES 001 NOV Republic
of
the
Sudan
Sudan Airways Unknown SUD Republic
of
the
Sudan
SUDANESE STATES AVIATION
010 SNV Republic
of
the
Sudan
COMPANY
SUN AIR COMPANY 051 SNR Republic
of
the
Sudan
TARCO AIRLINES 056 Unknown Republic
of
the
Sudan
All air carriers certified by the auth
Swaziland
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Swaziland,
including
SWAZILAND AIRLINK Unknown SZL Swaziland
All air carriers certified by the auth
Zambia
orities with responsibility for regu
latory oversight of Zambia,
including
ZAMBEZI AIRLINES Z/AOC/001/2009 ZMA Zambia

---

L 333/32
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2012
ANNEX B
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS
WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its Air Operator Certificate designation
State of the Operator Aircraft
type
restricted
when available,
State of registry
AOC (and its trading
(AOC) Number
number
construction serial
name, if different)
number(s)
AIR KORYO GAC-AOC/KOR-01 KOR DPRK All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the DPRK
exception of: 2
exception of:
aircraft of type
P-632, P-633
TU- 204
AFRIJET ( 1 ) 002/MTAC/ANAC-
ABS Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon
G/DSA
exception of: 2
exception of:
aircraft of type
TR-LGV; TR-LGY; TR-
Falcon 50, 2 aircraft AFJ; TR-AFR
of type Falcon 900
AIR ASTANA ( 2 ) AK-0443-11 KZR Kazakhstan All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Aruba (Kingdom of
exception of: aircraft exception of: aircraft the Netherlands)
of type B-767,
within the B-767
aircraft of type
fleet, as mentioned
B-757, aircraft of on the AOC, aircraft
type A319/320/321, within the B-757
aircraft of type
fleet, aircraft within
Fokker 50
the A319/320/321
fleet, as mention don
the AOC aircraft
within the Fokker 50
fleet, as mentioned
on the AOC
AIRLIFT
AOC 017 ALE Republic
of
Ghana All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Ghana
INTERNATIONAL
exception of: 2
exception of: 9G-TOP
(GH) LtD
aircraft of type
and 9G-RAC
DC8-63F
AIR
5R-M01/2009 MDG Madagascar All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Republic of
MADAGASCAR
exception of: 2
exception of:
Madagascar
aircraft of type
5R-MFH, 5R-MFI,
Boeing B-737-300, 2 5R-MJE, 5R-MJF,
aircraft of type ATR 5R-MJG, 5R-MVT,
72-500, 1 aircraft of 5R-MGC, 5R-MGD,
type ATR 42-500, 1 5R-MGF
aircraft of type ATR
42-320 and 3
aircraft of type DHC
6-300
Air Service
06-819/TA-
KMD Comoros All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Comoros
Comores
15/DGACM
exception of: LET exception of:
410 UVP
D6-CAM (851336)
GABON
001/MTAC/ANAC GBK Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon
AIRLINES ( 3 )
exception of: 1
exception of: TR-LHP
aircraft of type
Boeing B-767-200
( 1 ) Air carriers listed in Annex B could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not
subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

---

EN
5.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
333/33
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its Air Operator Certificate designation
State of the Operator Aircraft
type
restricted
when available,
State of registry
AOC (and its trading
(AOC) Number
number
construction serial
name, if different)
number(s)
IRAN AIR ( 4 ) FS100 IRA Islamic
Republic
of
All fleet with the All fleet with the Islamic Republic of
Iran
exception of: 14 exception of:
Iran
aircraft of type A- EP-IBA
300, 8 aircraft of EP-IBB
type A-310, 1
EP-IBC
aircraft B-737
EP-IBD
EP-IBG
EP-IBH
EP-IBI
EP-IBJ
EP-IBM
EP-IBN
EP-IBO
EP-IBS
EP-IBT
EP-IBV
EP-IBX
EP-IBZ
EP-ICE
EP-ICF
EP-IBK
EP-IBL
EP-IBP
EP-IBQ
EP-AGA
NOUVELLE AIR
003/MTAC/ANAC- NVS Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon;
AFFAIRES GABON G/DSA
exception of: 1
exception of:
Republic of South
(SN2AG)
aircraft of type Chal TR-AAG, ZS-AFG
Africa
lenger CL-601, 1
aircraft of type
HS-125-800
TAAG ANGOLA
001 DTA Republic of
All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Angola
AIRLINES
Angola
exception of: 5
exception of:
aircraft of type
D2-TED, D2-TEE,
Boeing B-777 and 4 D2-TEF, D2-TEG,
aircraft of type
D2-TEH, D2-TBF,
Boeing B-737-700
D2-TBG, D2-TBH,
D2-TBJ
( 1 ) Afrijet is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Union.
( 2 ) Air Astana is only allowed for their current operations within the EU to use the specific aircraft types listed above, provided (1) they are registered in Aruba and (2) all
changes to the AOC are timely submitted to the Commission and to Eurocontrol.
( 3 ) Gabon Airlines is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Community.
( 4 ) Iran Air is allowed to operate to the European Union using the specific aircraft under the conditions set out in recital (69) Regulation (EU) No 590/2010, OJ L 170,
6.7.2010, p. 15.’

---

Document Outline

• �

---