26.6.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 186/72

(1)

On 2 December 2009, following a recommendation from the Commission, the Council decided, in Decision 2010/283/EU (1), that an excessive deficit existed in Belgium. The Council noted that the general government deficit planned for 2009 was 5,9 % of GDP, thus above the 3 %-of-GDP Treaty reference value, while the general government gross debt was planned to reach 97,6 % of GDP in 2009, thus above the 60 %-of-GDP Treaty reference value. The general government deficit and debt for 2009 were subsequently revised to 5,6 % and 95,7 % of GDP, respectively.

(2)

On 2 December 2009, in accordance with Article 126(7) of the Treaty and Article 3(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 (2), the Council, based on a recommendation from the Commission, addressed a Recommendation to Belgium with a view to bringing the excessive deficit situation to an end by 2012 at the latest. That Recommendation was made public.

(3)

On 21 June 2013, on the basis of a Commission recommendation, the Council decided under Article 126(8) of the Treaty that Belgium had not taken effective action in compliance with Council Recommendation of 2 December 2009 to correct its excessive deficit by 2012, and decided under Article 126(9) of the Treaty to give notice to Belgium to put an end to the excessive deficit situation by 2013. Belgium was given the deadline of 15 September to report on the measures taken to comply with this decision in accordance with Article 5(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97. On 15 November 2013, the Commission concluded that Belgium had taken effective action and that no further steps in the excessive deficit procedure were needed at that moment.

(4)

In accordance with Article 4 of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaties, the Commission provides the data for the implementation of the procedure. As part of the application of that Protocol, Member States are to notify data on government deficits and debt and other associated variables twice a year, namely before 1 April and before 1 October, in accordance with Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 (3).

(5)

When considering whether a decision on the existence of an excessive deficit ought to be abrogated, the Council is to take a decision on the basis of notified data. Moreover, a decision on the existence of an excessive deficit should be abrogated only if the Commission forecasts indicate that the deficit will not exceed the 3 %-of-GDP Treaty reference value over the forecast horizon (4).

(6)

Based on data provided by the Commission (Eurostat) in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2009, following the notification by Belgium before 1 April 2014, the 2014 Stability Programme, and the Commission services 2014 spring forecast, the following conclusions are justified:

(7)

Starting from 2014, which is the year following the correction of the excessive deficit, Belgium is subject to the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact and should progress towards its MTO at an appropriate pace, including respecting the expenditure benchmark, and make sufficient progress towards compliance with the debt criterion in accordance with Article 2(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97.

(8)

In accordance with Article 126(12) of the Treaty, a Council Decision on the existence of an excessive deficit is to be abrogated when the excessive deficit in the Member State concerned has, in the view of the Council, been corrected.

(9)

In the view of the Council, the excessive deficit in Belgium has been corrected and Decision 2010/283/EU should therefore be abrogated,