8.7.2017   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/7

(1)

The application of a preferential liquidity outflow or inflow rate for cross-border undrawn credit or liquidity facilities within a group or an institutional protection scheme (IPS), as provided for in Articles 29 and 34 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 (2), is limited to those cases where the necessary safeguards are in place and only with the prior approval of the competent authorities. These safeguards are provided for in Articles 29(2) and 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 in terms of additional objective criteria to be met in the context of these transactions. Those safeguards should be further specified so as to clearly define the conditions for their compliance.

(2)

It should be ensured that the application of such preferential rates does not endanger the liquidity soundness of the liquidity provider and that it effectively alleviates the compliance with the liquidity coverage ratio of the liquidity receiver. A low liquidity risk profile should be demonstrated by the credit institutions' compliance with the liquidity coverage ratio and any other liquidity-related supervisory requirements and measures applied pursuant to Title VII, Chapter 2, Sections III and IV of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (3), together with the competent authorities' assessment, according to the latest supervisory review and evaluation process, that the institution's liquidity position poses a low level of risk, as objective references of their liquidity positions.

(3)

The effectiveness of the liquidity support within a group or an IPS on a cross-border basis should be guaranteed by a sound contractual framework evidenced by a legal opinion approved by the credit institutions' management body. A minimum remaining maturity of the line should ensure that the commitment is not punctual for a specific transaction but durable over a minimum period of time.

(4)

It should be ensured that the liquidity provider can provide the liquidity receiver with the necessary liquidity support in a timely manner, even in times of stress. For these purposes, the liquidity provider should monitor the liquidity position of the liquidity receiver and any contingency funding plans of the liquidity provider and receiver should address the effects of applying a preferential outflow or inflow rate.

(5)

The conditions for compliance with the additional objective criteria set out in Article 29(2) and Article 34(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 should be aimed at providing sufficient ground to expect a higher than normal cross-border liquidity flows within a group or an IPS in stress while not hampering the efficiency and effectiveness of a model where the liquidity is normally centrally managed. In certain specific cases of non-compliance with those conditions, namely where the liquidity provider or receiver does not meet or expects not to meet the liquidity coverage ratio or any liquidity related supervisory requirements or measures, or where the remaining maturity of the liquidity or credit line falls below the prescribed minimum or a notice of cancellation of the line is given, the relevant competent authorities should reassess whether the application of preferential liquidity outflow or inflow rates may be continued with the aim of avoiding the unintended consequences that an automatic suspension of the preferential treatment might cause in terms of procyclical and contagion effects.

(6)

The further specification of those additional objective criteria should not alter the responsibility of the credit institutions — as liquidity provider or liquidity receiver — to manage their liquidity risk on a prudent basis.

(7)

The further specification of those additional objective criteria should also be aimed at providing competent authorities with sufficient tools to determine the application of a preferential outflow or inflow rate.

(8)

This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by the European Banking Authority to the Commission.

(9)

The European Banking Authority has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4), and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010,

(a)

the liquidity provider and receiver have complied with the required level of the liquidity coverage ratio as set out in Articles 4 and 38 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61, as well as any liquidity-related supervisory requirements or measures applied pursuant to Title VII, Chapter 2, Sections III and IV of Directive 2013/36/EU, on an on-going basis and for at least 12 months prior to the authorisation to apply the preferential outflow or inflow rate for undrawn credit or liquidity facilities pursuant to Article 29(1) and Article 34(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61;

(b)

the liquidity provider and receiver's liquidity positions pose a low level of risk according to the latest supervisory review and evaluation process conducted in accordance with Title VII, Chapter 2, Section III of Directive 2013/36/EU.

(a)

the credit or liquidity line is a committed line which is legally and practically available at any time, for the duration of the facility, even during a period of stress, on a cross-border basis. It is specifically dedicated to the application of the preferential outflow or inflow rate provided for in Articles 29 and 34 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 and available on demand. For these purposes, credit institutions have conducted sufficient legal review supported by a written and reasoned legal opinion approved by their management bodies, confirming the legal validity and enforceability of the credit or liquidity line agreement or commitment in all relevant jurisdictions;

(b)

the currency denomination of the committed credit or liquidity line is consistent with the distribution by currency of the net liquidity outflows of the liquidity receiver that are unrelated to the line;

(c)

the amount and the cost of the committed credit or liquidity line are clearly specified in the relevant contract;

(d)

the agreements and commitments do not contain any clause that would allow the liquidity provider to:

(e)

the credit or liquidity line has a remaining maturity of over six months at all times. If the credit or liquidity line does not have a maturity date, it has a minimum notice period for cancellation of six months.

(a)

the liquidity provider monitors and oversees the liquidity position of the receiver on a daily basis. In case of correspondent banking, the monitoring and the oversight of the liquidity position of the receiver may be limited to the balances of the vostro accounts of the liquidity receiver;

(b)

the effects of the preferential outflow or inflow rate are fully considered and integrated into the contingency funding plans of the liquidity provider and the liquidity receiver, which take into account potential impediments to the transfer of such liquidity and assess the time needed to implement such a transfer. For these purposes, the liquidity provider demonstrates to the relevant competent authorities that it can reasonably be expected to continue to provide the liquidity facility to the liquidity receiver even in times of stress, without having a material adverse impact on its own liquidity position. The contingency funding plan of the liquidity provider ensures that it does not rely on the liquidity needed to honour the committed credit or liquidity line of the liquidity receiver;

(c)

the contingency funding plan of the liquidity provider takes into account the preferential outflow or inflow rate in order to ensure its ability to provide the necessary liquidity when required.