HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"L 104/10
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 390/2011
of 19 April 2011
amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are
subject to an operating ban within the Community
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
(5) The
authorities
with
responsibility
for
regulatory
oversight over the air carriers concerned have been
consulted by the Commission as well as, in specific
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
cases, by some Member States.
Union,
(6) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
heard
presentations
by
the
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the
European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005
Commission about the technical assistance projects
on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject
carried out in the countries affected by Regulation (EC)
to an operating ban within the Community and on informing
No 2111/2005. It has been informed about the requests
air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and
for further technical assistance and cooperation to
repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/EC ( 1 ), and in particular
improve the administrative and technical capability of
Article 4 thereof,
civil aviation authorities with a view to resolving any
non compliance with applicable international standards.
Whereas:
(7) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
also
been
informed
about
enforcement actions taken by EASA and Member States
(1) Commission
Regulation
(EC)
No
474/2006
( 2 ) established
to ensure the continuing airworthiness and maintenance
the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an
of aircraft registered in the Union and operated by air
operating ban within the Union referred to in Chapter II
carriers certified by civil aviation authorities of third
of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
countries.
(2) In
accordance
with
Article
4(3)
of
Regulation
(EC)
No (8) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
also
heard
presentations
2111/2005, some Member States communicated to the
by EASA about the categorisation of findings when
Commission information that is relevant in the context
carrying out ramp inspections in the framework of the
of updating the Community list. Relevant information
of the EU Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft (SAFA)
was also communicated by third countries. On this
programme and has endorsed the Agency’s proposals for
basis, the Community list should be updated.
a new categorisation of non-compliances with ICAO
English Language Proficiency (ELP) requirements for
pilots in the interest of guaranteeing full compliance
(3) The
Commission
informed
all
air
carriers
concerned
with ELP standards without further delay. In accordance
either directly or, when this was not practicable,
with such proposal, a category 2 finding should be raised
through the authorities responsible for their regulatory
in case of no ELP compliance but where the licensing
oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations
state has filed an action plan with ICAO to bring itself to
which would form the basis for a decision to impose on
compliance. Furthermore, a category 3 finding should be
them an operating ban within the Union or to modify
raised in case of no ELP compliance and where the
the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air
licensing state has not filed an action plan with ICAO
carrier which is included in the Community list.
or has notified full compliance without effectively
respecting this requirement. Finally, a general remark
(category G) should be recorded where formal ELP
compliance can be attested even though actual communi
(4)
Opportunity was given by the Commission to the air
cation during the ramp inspection process is very difficult
carriers concerned to consult documents provided by
because of the clear lack of English command of the
Member States, to submit written comments and to
pilots. The Air Safety Committee agreed to seek to
make an oral presentation to the Commission within
apply these proposals in a harmonised way. EASA
10 working days and to the Air Safety Committee estab
undertook to publish shortly relevant guidance material.
lished by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of
16 December 1991 on the harmonization of the
technical requirements and administrative procedures in
the field of civil aviation ( 3 ).
(9) The
Air
Safety
Committee
also
endorsed
the
Agency’s
proposal for Member States to establish functional links
with the relevant Air Navigation Service Providers to
( 1 ) OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p. 15.
( 2 ) OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 14.
report communication difficulties with aircraft crews
( 3 ) OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4.
due to the insufficient command of English of

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/11
the pilots. Finally, the Air Safety Committee requested
the context of a general change of policy in the
EASA to report at the next meeting of the Committee
company, two aircraft of type A320 with registration
on the SAFA results regarding the implementation of the
marks CS-TQO and CS-TQK were phased out in
ELP requirements for pilots as well as on the
12 November 2010 and 22 February 2011 respectively.
implementation of the proposed categorisation.
Germany
(10) Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 should be therefore
amended accordingly.
(13) Following
the
analysis
of
SAFA
inspection
data
by
EASA
and the identification of an increased number of certain
German air carriers with results from SAFA inspections
of greater than a major finding per inspection, the
Commission launched formal consultations with the
European Union air carriers
competent authorities of Germany (Luftfahrtbundesamt
— LBA) and held a meeting on 10 March 2011.
(11) Following the analysis of the European Aviation Safety

Agency of information resulting from SAFA ramp checks
carried out on aircraft of certain Union air carriers, as
well as area specific inspections and audits carried out by
their national aviation authorities, some Member States
(14) The
root
cause
analysis
of
the
performance
of
these
air
have taken certain enforcement measures. They informed
carriers revealed particular weaknesses in the oversight of
the Commission and the Air Safety Committee about
these carriers as also directly evidenced in a standard
these measures: Cyprus decided on 26 November 2010
isation inspection carried out by EASA from 26-
to suspend the Air Operator Certificate (AOC) of the air
29 May 2009 in the field of operations which also
carrier Eurocypria Airlines following the stop of
pointed at an insufficient numbers of qualified
operations and the lack of financial means of the air
personnel within the LBA, thus impacting upon
carrier to operate in safe conditions; Italy decided to
Germany’s ability to ensure continuous oversight and
suspend on 24 October 2010 the air transport licence
limiting the LBA’s ability to increase the level of
held by the air carrier Livingston and that held by the air
oversight where necessary.
carrier ItaliAirlines on 11 March 2011; Lithuania decided
to revoke the AOC of the air carrier Star 1 Airlines on
11 November 2010; following the liquidation of the air
carrier Blue Line and the subsequent suspension of its
(15) The
particular
situation
of
Bin
Air,
an
air
carrier
certified
operating licence, France decided to suspend the AOC of
in Germany, was discussed at the meeting of 10 March
this air carrier on 6 October 2010. Furthermore, France
where the air carrier attended and made presentations
decided not to renew the AOC of Strategic Airlines on
indicating the actions it had taken to address verified
16 September 2010; Greece decided to revoke the AOC
safety deficiencies identified during SAFA inspections.
of Hellas Jet in November 2010, had suspended the AOC
Also, the competent authorities of Germany informed
of Athens Airways in January 2011, and had placed
the Commission of the suspension of the AOC of the
Hellenic Imperial Airways under heightened surveillance;
air carrier ACH Hamburg GmbH.
Sweden decided not to renew the AOC of the air carrier
Viking Airlines AB on 31 December 2010 and the
United Kingdom had increased their surveillance activity
of the air carriers Jet2.com, Oasis and Titan Airways.
(16) Germany
confirmed
to
the
Air
Safety
Committee
that
the
AOC of ACH Hamburg GmbH remained in suspension
and the situation would be reviewed in May 2011, and if
no progress had been made by this air carrier by that
Portugal
date the AOC would be revoked. Germany also informed
(12) Following-up the review of the situation of certain air
that the oversight activities regarding the air carrier Bin
carriers licensed in Portugal at the Air Safety
Air had been intensified, the aircraft of type Cessna
Committee held in November 2010 (
C550, registration D-IJJJ, had been removed from the

1 ), the competent
authorities of Portugal (INAC) informed about the
AOC of air carrier Advance Air Luftfahrtgesellschaft,
results of the enhanced safety oversight of the air
and that the LBA had intensified its oversight of other
carriers Luzair and White. Regarding Luzair, INAC
air carriers where poor results from ramp checks had
reported that following a change of fleet, Luzair’s AOC
highlighted safety deficiencies. The LBA stated that they
was suspended on 11 February 2011. Regarding White,
had made it clear to these air carriers that suspension of
INAC reported that it had undertaken 29 inspections in
their AOCs could be the consequence if no
the field of operations as well as 5 inspections in the
improvements were noted.
field of airworthiness, which did not reveal significant
deficiencies. In addition, EASA reported that the air
carriers were inspected in November 2010 and that
neither inspection revealed significant deficiencies. In
(17) In
terms
of
the
lack
of
qualified
staff,
Germany
informed
the Air Safety Committee that no improvement in the
( 1 ) Recital 13 of Regulation (EU) No 1071/2010, OJ L 306,
situation would occur in 2011. However, an assessment
23.11.2010, p. 45.
of the LBA’s personnel resources was underway

---

L 104/12
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
and should conclude in spring 2011, therefore an
Flightline to prevent operation of the Fairchild Metro 3s,
improvement in the personnel situation is to be
and that they had initiated the process to suspend the
anticipated from 2012 onwards.
AOC.
(18) The
Commission
and
the
Air
Safety
Committee
noted
the
(23) The
Commission
invited
AESA
to
provide
further
clarifi
efforts made by the competent authorities of Germany in
cation on enforcement action concerning four other air
resolving the identified safety deficiencies of certain air
carriers certified in Spain which had been identified by
carriers, and the work underway to address the shortfall
EASA as having poor SAFA results. AESA subsequently
in personnel resources within the LBA. However, the
informed the Commission on 28 March 2011 that,
Commission also emphasised that, without prejudice to
following recent audits of Air Taxi and Charter Inter
the enforcement powers conferred on it by the Treaty, if
national, and Zorex, significant safety discrepancies had
such actions are ineffective in improving the performance
been noted and, therefore, the procedure to suspend the
of air carriers certified in Germany, action would be
AOCs of both air carriers had been initiated. In terms of
necessary to ensure that identified safety risks have
the air carrier Jetnova, AESA awaited the response of the
been adequately controlled.
air carrier to specific findings made by AESA and if
found to be inadequate will initiate the suspension
procedure. With respect to the air carriers Aeronova,
Tag Aviation and Alba Star, AESA was continuing its
Spain
oversight but considered specific regulatory action was
(19) Following
the
analysis
of
SAFA
inspection
data
by
EASA
not required at this stage. The air carrier Flightline was
and the identification of an increased number of Spanish
heard by the Air Safety Committee on 5 April 2011.
air carriers with results from SAFA inspections of greater
They briefed that they had introduced revised procedures
than a major finding per inspection, the Commission
to enhance the operational control of Flightline flights,
launched formal consultations with the competent
particularly those operating away from their main base,
authorities of Spain (AESA) and held a meeting on
had amended their Operations Manual to include
14 March 2011.
guidance on the use of alternate aerodromes, had
amended their training programme to reinforce pilot
knowledge of operating procedures, and had revised
their pilot selection procedures.
(20) The particular situation of Flightline, an air carrier
certified in Spain was discussed at the meeting. The air
carrier attended and made a presentation on actions
taken to address identified safety deficiencies noted
(24) Spain
informed
the
Air
Safety
Committee
that
following
during SAFA inspections. In addition the air carrier
discrepancies found during inspections of Flightline,
detailed the actions taken following the accident to
AESA had initiated on 14 March 2011 a procedure to
aircraft of type Fairchild Metro 3, registration EC-ITP.
suspend the AOC of Flightline and had introduced
Flightline explained that they had entered into a
precautionary measures to address the immediate safety
business arrangement with the company Air Lada, not
concern. AESA confirmed that Flightline had
a certified air carrier, to operate two Fairchild Metro 3
subsequently taken action to address the immediate
aircraft, registrations EC-GPS and EC-ITP, using pilots
safety concern and also provided a Corrective Action
provided by Air Lada. The Commission pointed out to
Plan which was being evaluated by AESA.
Flightline that the same aircraft had been previously
operating within the AOC of Eurocontinental, another
air carrier certified in Spain, and that as a result of
SAFA inspections and significant safety incidents with
(25) In light of the actions undertaken by the competent
the operation of these aircraft, AESA had suspended
authorities of Spain in resolving the identified safety defi
Eurocontinental’s AOC.
ciencies of Flightline and other Spanish air carriers it is
assessed that, at this time, no further action is necessary.
However, the Commission underlined that if such actions
are ineffective in improving the performance of air
(21) Flightline
stated
they
had
conducted
all
the
required
carriers certified in Spain, action would be necessary to
conversion training of the pilots and had carried out
ensure that identified safety risks have been adequately
quality checks of the operation of the aircraft in the
controlled. In the meantime, the Commission, in co-
Isle of Man. The Commission requested further details
operation with EASA, will continue to monitor the
concerning the air carrier’s corrective action plan and
safety performance of Spanish air carriers.
copies of the internal audit reports of the Fairchild
Metro 3 operation. Following receipt of the information
on 22 March, the Commission invited the air carrier
Flightline to make presentations to the Air Safety
Air carriers from Angola
Committee.
(26) INAVIC
reported
further
progress
in
the
resolution
of
the
remaining deficiencies identified by ICAO during its
mission on site carried out in January 2010. In particular,
(22) At
the
meeting
on
14
March
2011
AESA
briefed
the
INAVIC continues to update the Angolan aviation safety
Commission that they decided to limit the AOC of
regulations to reflect the last amendments of

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/13
ICAO standards, further strengthens its capacity, pro-
nor that the significant safety concern identified by
gresses in the recertification of the air carriers in
ICAO in relation to the certification of air carriers in
accordance with those regulations, further consolidates
Angola was effectively closed. Consequently, on the
its surveillance programme.
basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these
carriers should be placed on Annex A.
(27) With
regard
to
the
oversight
of
TAAG
Angolan
Airlines,
INAVIC confirmed the information presented to the
(32) INAVIC
finally
reported
that
four
air
carriers
were
still
in
Commission on 3 March 2011: two aircraft B777
the recertification process: DIEXIM, AIRNAVE,
operated by TAAG had been involved in two serious
GUICANGO and MAVEWA. The recertification process,
incidents in December 2010 in Portugal and in Angola
which was expected to be completed by end of 2010,
with damage not contained to the engine. Following
was delayed until 15 April 2011, date by which INAVIC
preliminary results of the investigation carried out by
indicated that those carriers shall stop operations if not
the competent authorities of Portugal, at this stage, it
recertified in accordance with the Angolan aviation safety
appeared that both the air carrier and the competent
regulations. Pending the conclusion of this process, on
authorities have taken the necessary measures to
the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these
address the causes identified in relation with the manu
carriers as well as other air carriers under the regulatory
facturer and to prevent their further reoccurrence. The
responsibility of INAVIC should remain in Annex A.
operations have now resumed, including to the EU,
under an enhanced surveillance programme in liaison
with the manufacturer.
(33) The
Commission
urges
INAVIC
to
finalise
the
recertifi

cation of the Angolan air carriers with determination and
due consideration to potential safety concerns identified
in this process. The Commission also encourages INAVIC
(28) INAVIC informed that in the course of the recertification
to fully cooperate with ICAO in order to validate the
process, oversight activities of certain air carriers have
progress in the implementation of its corrective action
revealed safety concerns and violations of the safety regu
plan, including if possible and as appropriate, through an
lations in force, leading INAVIC to take appropriate
on-site mission (ICAO Coordinated Validation Mission —
enforcement actions. Six air carriers found not in
ICVM).
compliance with the Angolan aviation safety regulations:
AIR GEMINI, SERVISAIR, ALADA, RUI & CONCEICAO,
PHA and SAL. In particular, INAVIC provided evidence
Air carriers from Cambodia
that their AOC had expired and had not been renewed or
were revoked. Consequently, on the basis of the common
(34) Further
to their last report on the situation in the
criteria, these carriers should be removed from Annex A.
Kingdom of Cambodia (


1 ), the competent authorities of
Cambodia (SSCA) informed that enforcement actions
undertaken to address the deficiencies identified in the
course of the ICAO audits have lead to the revocation of
(29) INAVIC also indicated that the AOC of the two air
all Air Operator Certificates (AOC) that were issued to air
carriers, ANGOLA AIR SERVICES and GIRA GLOBO,
carriers licensed in the Kingdom of Cambodia at the time
have been suspended. Pending evidence of technical
of the ICAO audit.
capacity to complete satisfactorily the certification
process by 15 April 2011, on the basis of the
common criteria, it is assessed that these carriers
(35) In
particular,
they
confirmed
that
the
AOC
of
Siem
Reap
should remain in Annex A.
International Airways was revoked on 10 October 2010.
On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
this air carrier should be removed from Annex A.
(30) INAVIC indicated it had recertified five air carriers in
accordance with the Angolan Aviation Safety Regu
lations: SONAIR Air Services in December 2010,
(36) EASA reported on the technical assistance mission
AIR26 on 31 January 2011, HELI-MALONGO Aviation
carried out in January 2011 to support the capacity
Services of Angola, AEROJET, AIRJET and HELIANG on
building of the competent authorities of the Kingdom
15 February 2011. However, to date, there is no verified
of Cambodia. EASA confirmed that the competent
evidence that sufficient investigations had been
authorities of Cambodia have made very significant
progress in the resolution of the deficiencies identified
conducted prior to the issuance of these new AOCs
by ICAO. In particular, they have restructured completely
nor that the significant safety concern identified by
the aviation legislation and the internal procedures for
ICAO in relation to the certification of air carriers in
the initial and continuing oversight of undertakings,
Angola was effectively closed. Consequently, on the
which pave the way for an oversight in accordance
basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these
with the international safety standards. The Commission
carriers should remain on Annex A.
acknowledges the significant efforts undertaken by the
SSCA to comply with the international safety standards
and recognises the important of the enforcement actions
(31) INAVIC
further
indicated
that
it
had
certified
one
new
air
taken in that respect.
carrier: FLY540 on 31 January 2011. However, there is
no verified evidence that sufficient investigations was
( 1 ) Regulation (EU) No 590/2010 of 5 July 2010 (OJ L 170, 6.7.2010,
conducted prior to the issuance of these new AOCs
p. 12).

---

L 104/14
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
Air carriers from the Democratic Republic of Congo
registered in Georgia imported from countries whose air
carriers have been subject to an operating ban within the
(37) All
air
carriers
certified
in
the
Democratic
Republic
of
European Union.
Congo are subject to an operational ban within the
Community and listed in Annex A. There is verified
evidence that the competent authorities of the Demo
cratic Republic of Congo have issued an air operating
(42) The
Commission,
having
regard
to
the
abovementioned
licence to the air carrier Korongo Airlines on 7 January
evidence material, met with the competent authorities of
2011.
Georgia on 22 March 2011. UTA submitted additional
documentation on 22, 25, 28 and 29 March 2011. This
documentation indicated that a new independent Civil
Aviation Agency is to be established as of 15 April
(38) The
Commission
entered
into
consultations
with
the
2011, and that a number of aircraft have been dereg
competent authorities of the Democratic Republic of
istered ( 2 ) as a consequence of the revision of the ‘Rules
Congo to obtain clarifications on the situation of this
for the state registration and issuance of certificate of
air carrier and the conditions of its oversight. The
airworthiness to Georgian civil aircraft’ that entered
competent authorities of the Democratic Republic of
into force on 1 January 2011.
Congo failed to provide a reply.
(43) UTA made oral presentations to the Air Safety
Committee on 5 April 2011. During the presentation
(39) As
there
is
no
evidence
of
any
change
to
the
capacity
of
UTA confirmed that a number of air operator certificates
the competent authorities of the Democratic Republic of
had been revoked and that twenty nine out of seventy
Congo to ensure the oversight of air carriers licensed in
nine aircraft on the state register had been removed.
that State in compliance with the applicable safety
Furthermore, UTA informed about the corrective
standards, on the basis of the common criteria, it is
actions implemented as the result of the ICAO USOAP
assessed that Korongo Airlines should be added to
audit carried out in 2007, and presented a reform
Annex A.
programme encompassing the harmonisation of
aviation legislation with the EU acquis resulting from
the Common Aviation Area Agreement. These efforts
are supported by various initiatives such as a twinning
Air carriers from Georgia
programme and technical assistance to UTA in the

framework of the TRACECA programme (Transport
(40) There
is
verified
evidence
of
SAFA
ramp
inspections
( 1 ) of
Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia).
aircraft of certain air carriers registered in Georgia indi
cating various major findings. The competent authorities
of Georgia (United Transport Administration — UTA)
submitted information regarding enforcement action
(44) The
Commission
and
the
Air
Safety
Committee
took
taken on the AOCs of those air carriers as well as on
note of the progress made by UTA, its willingness to
others. According to this information the following
provide transparent information and cooperate closely
AOCs were revoked: LTD Eurex Airline and JSC Tam
to remove gaps and that further reforms are foreseen
Air revoked on 24 November 2010, LTD Sky Way
in the near future. The Commission will continue to
and LTD Sakaviaservice revoked on 29 November
work closely with the competent authorities of Georgia
2010, LTD Jav Avia revoked on 18 January 2011, LTD
in their efforts to modernise their civil aviation safety
Carre Aviation Georgia revoked on 8 February 2011,
system.
LTD Air Batumi revoked on 17 March 2011 and LTD
Air Iberia revoked on 4 April 2011. The AOC of LTD
( 2 ) The following aircraft were deregistered in the period 13.8.2010 —
Sun Way expired on 3 February 2011 and was not
23.3.2011: two AN-12 with registration numbers 4L-GLU and 4L-
FFD and four IL-76 with registration numbers 4L-FFG, 4L-GLP, 4L-
renewed.
GLX, 4L-FFE operated by Sky Way; two IL-76 with registration
numbers 4L-GLR and 4L-GLK and two AN-12 with registration
numbers 4L-GLT and 4L-GLN operated by Saqaviaservice; three IL-
76 with registration numbers 4L-GLM, 4L-MGC and 4L-MGM
operated by Sun Way; one IL-76 with registration number 4L-
(41) There
is
verified
evidence
of
accidents
and
incidents
on
AWA operated by Air West; three AN-12 with registration
the part of several Georgian air carriers. This includes the
numbers 4L-IRA, 4L-HUS, 4L-VAL operated by Air Victor Georgia;
accident of an aircraft type Ilyushin 76TD with the regis
one AN-12 with registration number 4L-PAS operated by Transavia
tration number 4L-GNI operated by Sun Way that
service; one AS-350B3 with registration number 4L-GGG operated
occurred in Karachi, Pakistan on 28 November 2010
by Aviaservice; one AN-28 with registration numbers 4L-28001
operated by Georgian Aviation University; one YAK-40 with regis
and the recent accident of aircraft type Canadair CL
tration number 4L-AAK operated by Tam Air; one B-737 with
600 with the registration number 4L-GAE operated by
registration number 4L-TGM operated by Georgia Airways; one
Georgian Airways that occurred in Kinshasa, Democratic
AN-26 with registration number 4L-JAV operated by Jav Avia; one
Republic of Congo on 4 April 2011. There is also
AN-12 with registration number 4L-BKN operated by Fly Adjara;
evidence of safety non-compliances related to aircraft
two AN-26 with registration numbers 4L-GST and 4L-GSS
operated by Carre Aviation Georgia; one B-747 with registration
number 4L-KMK operated by Eurex Airlines; one SAAB 340 with
( 1 ) SAFA inspections’ numbers: AESA-E-2010-255; No AESA-E-2010-
registration number 4L — EUI operated by Georgian International
328; No BCAA-2010-134;; No CAA-NL-2010-20; No DGAC/
Airlines and one MI — 8T with registration number 4L –BGA
F-2010-1024; No DGAC/F-2010-1708; No MOTLUX-2010-19.
operated by Tisheti.

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/15
(45) Member States shall ensure that the ramp inspections on
of Israel and heard the air carrier on 16 March 2010.
aircraft of air carriers registered in Georgia to verify their
The consultations revealed that the air carrier was not
effective compliance with the relevant safety standards
properly certified by the competent authorities of Israel
are intensified pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC)
as it was holding an AOC despite the fact that it was not
No 351/2008 ( 1 ) in order to provide basis for the re-
able to demonstrate that it ensured safe operation of
assessment of this case during the next Air Safety
airworthy aircraft operated under its responsibility (main
Committee meeting.
tenance and operations control outside the company).
Furthermore, the company was not able to demonstrate
that it had put appropriate remedial and corrective
Air carriers from Indonesia
actions in place to provide for sustainable solutions to
the various findings raised during SAFA ramp checks.
(46) Further to Regulation (EU) No 590/2010
( 2 ), the
Hence, the consultations could not ascertain that the
Commission continued actively the consultations with
carrier complies with the relevant safety standards.
the competent authorities of Indonesia on the actions
undertaken by them to improve aviation safety in
Indonesia and to ensure compliance with the applicable
safety standards.
(52) Following the consultations with the Commission and
the European Aviation Safety Agency and further con-
(47) The competent authorities of Indonesia (DGCA)
sultations with the air carrier, the competent authorities
participated in a video conference with the Commission
of Israel decided to revoke the AOC of Sun D’Or effective
on 11 March 2011 and informed that all air carriers
April 1, 2011. Following their decision all aircraft were
certified in Indonesia, with the exception of Wing Air,
put on the AOC of another Israeli air carrier and Sun
had undergone re-certification. The DGCA also informed
D’Or was solely engaged in activities as a ticket seller.
that only 9 % of the fleet of aircraft operating in
Indonesia had yet to be fitted with the required ICAO
equipment, that the DGCA had issued an exemption
permitting operations until the end of 2011, and that
aircraft not fitted after this date would be grounded.
(53) The
competent
authorities
of
Israel
were
invited
to
make
presentations regarding the oversight of this air carrier to
the Air Safety Committee and did so on 6 April 2011.
During their presentation they stated that Sun D’Or was
(48) The
Air
Safety
Committee
takes
note
of
these
devel
opments and encourages the competent authorities of
not to be (re-)certified. During their presentation, the
Indonesia to continue their efforts to enhance the
competent authorities of Israel also informed about
oversight of air carriers under their regulatory responsi
their overall efforts to enhance their oversight capabilities
bility.
and to modernise Israel’s safety system.

(49) The
DGCA
requested
the
removal
of
cargo
only
air
carriers Cardig Air, Republic Express, Asia Link and Air
(54) Consequently,
on
the
basis
of
the
common
criteria,
it
is
Maleo, and provided documented evidence showing that
assessed that no further action is required.
the operations of these air carriers were limited to only
cargo and excluded the carriage of passengers, and that
these authorities took appropriate enforcement action to
limit their AOCs to exclude operations into and out of
the European Union.
Israir
(55) Following the analysis by EASA of the results of ramp
checks carried out on aircraft operated into the EU since
(50) As
a
consequence,
on
the
basis
of
the
common
criteria,
it
2008 by the air carrier Israir certified in Israel revealing
is assessed that the Indonesian air carriers Cardig Air,
repetitive serious non compliances with international
Republic Express, Asia Link and Air Maleo should be
safety standards, the Commission entered into formal
removed from Annex A.
consultations with the competent authorities of Israel
and heard the air carrier on 16 March 2010. The con-
sultations revealed that the air carrier has put in place a
Air carriers from Israel
series of structural measures designed to ensure that it
Sun D’Or
complies with the relevant safety standards in a
sustainable manner. The air carrier changed management
(51) Following the analysis by EASA of the results of ramp
(post-holders) with a view to putting effectively in place a
checks carried out on aircraft operated into the EU since
safety policy on the basis of a safety management system.
2008 by the air carrier Sun D’Or certified in Israel
It removed from its fleet 3 aircraft of type Airbus A-320
revealing repetitive serious non compliances with
(registration 4X-ABH, 4X-ABD and 4X-ABF) which gave
international safety standards, the Commission entered
raise to the majority of serious findings raised during
into formal consultations with the competent authorities
SAFA ramp checks. Finally it enhanced the training of
qualified staff to ensure that pre-flight inspections are
( 1 ) OJ L 109, 19.4.2008, p. 7.
appropriately carried out; it revised its internal operations
( 2 ) OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 9.
procedures and introduced a new quality assurance

---

L 104/16
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
system along with a quality assurance audit system; it
on-site assessment to verify the progress achieved in
revised completely its ground operations manual and
the implementation of the action plan.
its maintenance manual and introduced a modern
operations control centre manual.
Air carriers from Kyrgyzstan
(56) In
view
of
these
changes
and
in
the
light
of
the
presen
(62) The
competent
authorities
of
Kyrgyzstan
informed
that
tation of the competent authorities of Israel in the Air
the AOCs of the following four air carriers — Golden
Safety Committee on 6 April 2011, it is assessed that the
Rules Airlines (GRS), Max Avia (MAI), Tenir Airlines
air carrier is able to improve continuously its
(TEB) and Sky Gate International (SGD) were revoked
performance. Member States will continue to verify the
in 2009 and 2010 and their ICAO designator codes
effective compliance of Israir with the relevant safety
were recalled by ICAO. Consequently, on the basis of
standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections
the common criteria, it is assessed that these carriers
to be carried out on aircraft of this air carrier pursuant to
should be removed from Annex A.
Regulation (EC) No 351/2008.
(63) The
competent
authorities
of
Kyrgyzstan
also
informed
Air carriers from Kazakhstan
that the AOCs of three other air carriers — Itek Air,
Trast Aero and Asian Air, had expired but failed to
(57) The competent authorities of Kazakhstan informed the
Commission that they are progressing in an ambitious
provide evidence thereof. Consequently, on the basis of
reform of the aviation sector undertaken since 2009 with
the common criteria, it is assessed that these carriers
should remain in Annex A.
a view to enhancing air safety. Following the adoption of

a new civil aviation code in July 2010, more than 100
specific aviation regulations are being elaborated and the
(64) Given
that
no
evidence
of
full
implementation
of
appro
majority of which are already adopted. The competent
priate remedial actions by the other air carriers certified
authorities are also progressing in their capacity building
in Kyrgyzstan and by the authorities with responsibility
with the recruitment of additional qualified inspectors, to
for regulatory oversight of these air carriers has been
be continued in the coming months.
communicated to the Commission so far, on the basis
of the common criteria, it is assessed that these air
(58) The
competent
authorities
of
Kazakhstan
informed
that
carriers should remain in Annex A.
they continued to take enforcement actions. In particular,
they informed that they revoked the AOC of the
following air carriers: Air Flamingo; Almaty Aviation;
(65) The
Commission
encourages
the
competent
authorities
Atyrau Aye Zholy; Arkhabay; Asia Continental Avialines;
of Kyrgyzstan to continue their efforts towards resolution
Centr Pankh; Kazavia National Airlines; Kokhshetau
of all non-compliance findings identified during the audit
Airlines, Orlan 2000; Zherzu Avia.
carried out by ICAO in April 2009 as part of its
Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP).
The European Commission, assisted by the European
(59) The
competent authorities of Kazakhstan stated and
Aviation Safety Agency and with the support of the
provided evidence showing that these air carriers are
Member States, is ready to carry out an assessment on
not any more engaged in commercial air transportation
site once the implementation of the action plan
and do not hold any more a valid operating licence in
submitted to ICAO has sufficiently advanced; The
that respect. Therefore they are not considered any more
objective of this visit would be to verify the implemen
as air carriers within the meaning of Article 2(a) of
tation of the applicable safety requirements by the
Regulation EC No 2111/2005. In view of this, on the
competent authorities and by the undertakings under
basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these ten
its oversight.
air carriers should be removed from Annex A.
Air Madagascar
(60) The
competent
authorities
of
Kazakhstan
also
informed
that they reconsidered the case of the air carrier
(66) There
is
evidence
of
numerous
safety
deficiencies
on
the
KazAirWest, which had its AOC previously revoked,
part of Air Madagascar certified in Madagascar. These
and issued a new AOC to this air carrier. On the basis
deficiencies have been identified by the competent
of the common criteria, it is assessed that this air carrier
authorities of France during ramp inspections
should be maintained in Annex A.
performed under the SAFA programme. The results
concerning the B-767 aircraft are noticeably worse than
other aircraft of the air carrier. The number of findings at
(61) The
Commission
supports
the
ambitious
reform
of
the
each SAFA inspection, the repetition of the safety defi
Civil aviation system undertaken by the authorities of
ciencies and the fact that the situation is deteriorating
Kazakhstan and invites these authorities to continue
since 2010 indicate a serious safety concern.
with determination their efforts to implement the
corrective actions plan agreed with ICAO, focusing in
priority on the unresolved significant safety concerns
(67) ICAO
carried
out
a
Universal
Safety
Oversight
Audit
in
and the recertification of all operators under their
February 2008 and reported a large number of
responsibility. The Commission is ready to organise in
significant deficiencies with regards to the capability of
due time, with the assistance of the European Aviation
the civil aviation authorities of Madagascar to perform
Safety Agency and the support of Member States, an
their air safety oversight responsibilities.

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/17
(68) The
Commission,
having
regard
to
the
SAFA
inspections
(73) Taking
into
account
the
numerous
and
repeated
safety
and the results of the ICAO audit report, entered on
deficiencies detected during ramp checks of aircraft of
28 February 2011 into a formal consultation with the
type Boeing B-767 operated by Air Madagascar and the
competent authorities of Madagascar, expressing serious
insufficient ability of the company to implement to date
concerns about the safety of the operations of Air
an appropriate corrective and preventive actions plan and
Madagascar and urging the carrier and its competent
the lack of exercise of adequate safety oversight exercised
authorities pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No
by the competent authorities of Madagascar of the
2111/2005 to take measures to respond to ICAO
operations of this air carrier, the Commission following
findings and to satisfactorily resolve the safety
the opinion of the Air Safety Committee considers that,
deficiencies detected by SAFA inspections.
the air carrier should not be allowed to operate into the
Union with its aircraft of type Boeing B-767.
Accordingly, on the basis of the common criteria, it is
assessed that Air Madagascar should be placed on Annex
B and its operations should be subject to restrictions to
(69) The
Commission
met
on
16
March
2011
with
the
civil
exclude all aircraft of type Boeing B-767. The air carrier
aviation authorities of Madagascar and representatives
should be permitted to fly into the Union with the other
from Air Madagascar in order to get assurance that
types of aircraft on its AOC as per Annex B.
they have both taken actions to solve the safety defi
ciencies raised during the SAFA inspections or that at
least appropriate measures have been taken to mitigate
the identified safety risks. Unfortunately, information
(74) Member States will continue to verify the effective
provided during this meeting could not demonstrate
compliance of Air Madagascar with the relevant safety
the conduct of a comprehensive root cause analysis of
standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections
the safety deficiencies and the implementation of a solid
to be carried out on aircraft of this air carrier pursuant to
corrective and preventive action plan by the company as
Regulation (EC) No 351/2008.
well as the running of an appropriate safety oversight
programme by the authorities. As a consequence, the
civil aviation authorities of Madagascar and the
operator Air Madagascar were invited to clarify the
Air carriers from Mozambique
situation during the meeting of the Air Safety
Committee in April 2011.
(75) There is verified evidence of lack of ability of the
authority responsible for the safety oversight of air
carriers certified in Mozambique to implement and
enforce the relevant safety standards, as demonstrated
by the results of the audit carried out by the ICAO
(70) Air Madagascar and the competent authorities of
under the Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme
Madagascar were heard by the Air Safety Committee
(USOAP) in January 2010. This audit reported a large
on 5 April 2011. Air Madagascar presented a further
number of significant deficiencies with regard to the
enhanced corrective and preventive action plan based
capability of the civil aviation authorities of Mozambique
on a solid root cause analysis but failed to provide
to discharge their air safety oversight responsibilities. At
evidence that these actions have produced results so far.
the time of the issuance of the ICAO final report, more
than 77 % of ICAO standards were not effectively imple
mented. On certain critical elements such as the
provision for qualified technical personnel, more than
98 % of ICAO standards were not effectively imple
(71) The
Committee
whilst
welcoming
the
encouraging
moves
mented. Regarding the resolution of safety concerns,
by the air carrier expressed its concerns regarding the
more than 93 % of ICAO standards were not effectively
persistence of serious weaknesses in the field of the
implemented.
continuing airworthiness of all aircraft operated by Air
Madagascar. The air carrier accepted the deficiencies
regarding its aircraft of type Boeing B-767. It stated
that it considered the measures currently in place
(76) Following
the
USOAP
audit
of
Mozambique,
ICAO
has
capable of mitigating the safety risks for the rest of its
notified to all states party to the Chicago Convention the
fleet because of the lower flight frequencies and/or the
existence of a significant safety concern affecting the
age of these aircraft.
safety oversight of carriers licensed in Mozambique ( 1 ),
according to which the certification process used in
Mozambique for the issuance of an Air Operator
Certificate (AOC) does not address the applicable
provisions of ICAO Annex 6. In particular, the 15 air
(72) The Committee acknowledged the efforts made by the air
operators in Mozambique, including international air
carrier towards bringing sustainable solutions in response
operators, still operate with Air Operator Certificates
to the safety deficiencies raised during the SAFA
(AOCs) that were issued in accordance with the
inspections and urged the competent authorities of
previous regulations that have been repealed. The
Madagascar to enhance their oversight activities with a
competent authorities of Mozambique (IACM) had not
view to ensuring an effective implementation of the
evaluated all of the specific items pertaining to the
corrective and preventive action plan of the operator
without undue delay.
( 1 ) ICAO finding OPS/01.

---

L 104/18
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
certification process prior to the issuance of an AOC, and
been repealed; however, IACM did not provide these
the IACM cannot ensure that all of the 15 AOC holders
certificates. Furthermore, the significant safety concern
comply with the provisions of Annex 6 and national
notified by ICAO in that respect remains open to date.
regulations prior to conducting international flight
operations. Furthermore, the IACM has not been
performing surveillance inspections of air operators for
over 2 years.
(80) Mozambique
Airlines
(LAM)
made
written
submissions

and made presentations to the Air Safety Committee
on 6 April 2011. LAM confirmed it was recertified on
6 April 2010 in accordance with the Civil Aviation Regu
lations of Mozambique. However, this AOC, which
(77) There is evidence of insufficient ability from the
expired on 5 April, was renewed on 6 April 2011 by
competent authorities of Mozambique to remedy
IACM with a limitation to exclude the low visibility
effectively the non-compliance findings made by ICAO,
approaches in Cat III as it was confirmed the carrier
as demonstrated by the fact that a significant part of the
did not have the approvals to conduct such approaches.
corrective action plans proposed by these authorities to
Mozambique Express (MEX) made written submissions
remedy the non-compliance findings identified by ICAO
and made presentations to the Air Safety Committee
were not considered acceptable by ICAO. This is in
on 6 April 2011. MEX confirmed it was recertified in
particular the case for the significant safety concern
April 2010 in accordance with the Civil Aviation Regu
identified by ICAO, which remains unresolved.
lations of Mozambique, although four aircraft of type
Furthermore, the competent authorities of Mozambique
Embraer 120 are operated without being equipped with
informed that the implementation of the corrective
E-GPWS (TAWS).
action plans has experienced delays.
(81) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee
acknowledge the efforts made to reform the civil
(78) The
Commission,
having
regard
to
the
results
of
the
aviation system in Mozambique and the first steps
ICAO USOAP audit, has entered into consultations
undertaken to address the safety deficiencies reported
with the competent authorities of Mozambique (IACM)
by ICAO. However, on the basis of the common
in March 2010, expressing serious concerns about the
criteria, pending the effective implementation of
safety of the operations of air carriers licensed in the
adequate corrective actions to remedy the deficiencies
State, asking for clarifications regarding the actions
identified by ICAO and in particular the significant
undertaken by the competent authorities to address the
safety concerns, it is assessed that the competent
findings identified by ICAO.
authorities of Mozambique are, at this stage, not able
to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards
on all air carriers under their regulatory control.
Therefore, all air carriers certified in Mozambique
should be subject to an operating ban and therefore
(79) IACM
submitted
documentation
between
April
2010
and
April 2011 and made presentations to the Air Safety
included in Annex A.
Committee on 6 April 2011. IACM indicated that
following the submission to ICAO of the above
mentioned corrective action plan, they have initiated
(82) The
competent
authorities
of
Portugal
reported
that
they
the first steps of its implementation. They informed in
have agreed to provide technical assistance to the
particular that a reform of IACM is underway, with a
competent authorities of Mozambique and started to
view to strengthen significantly its independence and its
do so. This technical assistance will in particular
oversight capacity, and that pending the recruitment of
encompass training of qualified staff and procedures in
sufficient qualified inspectors IACM had entered into
the area of exercise of oversight.
contracts with external consultants to support the
oversight activities. However, in the opinion of the Air
Safety Committee, IACM did not provide evidence that
IACM alone has currently sufficient resources to ensure
(83) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee
the oversight of all air carriers certified in Mozambique.
encourage Mozambique to continue to fully cooperate
They informed that 13 air carriers are certified in
with ICAO to validate an adequate corrective action
Mozambique and that they have been able, with the
plan to remedy the deficiencies identified by that Organi
support of these consultants, to recertify 8 of them in
sation and to validate the progress in its implementation
2010 in accordance with the Civil Aviation Regulations
through an ICVM mission in due time. The European
of Mozambique, including three air carriers involved in
Commission, with the support of the European
international flights — Mozambique Airlines,
Aviation Safety Agency, as well as the Member States,
Mozambique Express and Trans Airways. However, in
is ready to consider providing technical assistance if
the opinion of the Air Safety Committee, they did not
necessary in that respect.
provide evidence that these carriers are subject to a
continuous oversight in line with the applicable safety
standards. Finally, they confirmed that 5 air carriers,
(84) The
Commission
following
the
opinion
of
the
Air
Safety
declared to be solely involved in domestic operations,
Committee will be ready to reassess the situation on the
continue to operate with AOCs that were issued in
basis of verified evidence that the implementation of the
accordance with the previous regulations that have
action plan submitted to ICAO has sufficiently advanced.

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/19
Air carriers from the Russian Federation
type with registration RA-85682 is operated by
another air carrier certified in the Russian Federation.
(85) Following a visit by the Commission to the Russian
Federation in December 2010, the competent authorities
of the Russian Federation submitted information
regarding the AOCs of certain Russian air carriers
(f) Kuban
Airlines:
aircraft
Yakovlev
Yak-42
registration
whose results in SAFA ramp inspections indicated
RA-42331, RA-42350, RA-42538, and RA-42541.
various major findings per inspection. Furthermore,
during consultations with these authorities on 8 March
the competent authorities of the Russian Federation
(g) Orenburg Airlines: aircraft Tupolev TU-154B regis
undertook to submit to the Commission the following
tration RA-85602; all TU-134 (unknown regis
information: a) information on the results of their
tration); all Antonov An-24 (unknown registration);
surveillance activities of the RU authorities on the
all An-2 (unknown registration); all helicopters Mi-2
identified Russian air carriers; b) information on the
(unknown registration); all helicopters Mi-8
implementation of corrective actions by these air
(unknown registration).
carriers to resolve problems identified during SAFA
ramp inspections; and c) the list of AOCs of certain
Russian air carriers flying into the EU.
(h) Moscovia Airlines: aircraft Antonov AN-12
RA-12193 and RA-12194.
(86) On the basis of the information submitted by the
(i) Tatarstan
Airlines:
aircraft
Yakovlev
Yak-42D regis
competent authorities of the Russian Federation, the
tration RA-42374 and RA-42433.
following aircraft contained in the AOCs of certain air
carriers do not currently comply with ICAO standards
and the Air Safety Committee urges the Commission to
(j) Ural
Airlines:
aircraft
Tupolev
TU-154B
registration
seek to clarify the international operations of these
RA-85508 (the aircraft RA-85319, RA-85337,
aircraft with the competent authorities of the Russian
RA-85357, RA-85375, RA-85374 and RA-85432
Federation:
are currently not operated for financial reasons).
(a) Aircompany Yakutia: aircraft Antonov AN-140
(k) UTAir: aircraft Tupolev TU-154M registration
registration RA-41250; AN-24RV registration
RA-85733, RA-85755, RA-85806, RA-85820; all
RA-46496, RA-46665, RA-47304, RA-47352,
(24) TU-134: RA-65024, RA-65033, RA-65127,
RA-47353, RA-47360; RA-47363AN-26
RA-65148, RA-65560, RA-65572, RA-65575,
registration RA-26660; aircraft Tupolev TU-154M
RA-65607, RA-65608, RA-65609, RA-65611,
registration RA-85007, RA-85707 and 85794.
RA-65613, RA-65616, RA-65620, RA-65622,
RA-65728, RA-65755, RA-65777, RA-65780,
RA-65793, RA-65901, RA-65902, and RA-65977;
(b) Atlant Soyuz: aircraft Tupolev TU-154M registration
the aircraft RA-65143 and RA-65916 are operated
RA-85672 and RA-85682 previously operated by
by another Russian carrier; all (1) TU-134B:
Atlant Soyuz are both aircraft currently operated
RA-65726; all (10) aircraft Yakovlev Yak-40:
by other air carriers certified in the Russian
RA-87348 (currently not operated for financial
Federation.
reasons), RA-87907, RA-87941, RA-87997,
RA-88209, RA-88227 and RA-88280; the aircraft
of the same type RA-87292 and RA-88244 have
(c) Gazpromavia: aircraft Tupolev TU-154M registration
been retired; all helicopters Mil-26: (unknown regis
RA-85625 and RA-85774; Yakovlev Yak-40 regis
tration); all helicopters Mil-10: (unknown regis
tration RA-87511, RA- 88300 and RA-88186;
tration); all helicopters Mil-8 (unknown registration);
Yak-40K registration RA-21505, RA-98109 and
all helicopters AS-355 (unknown registration); all
RA-8830; Yak-42D registration RA-42437; all (22)
helicopters BO-105 (unknown registration); the
helicopters Kamov Ka-26 (unknown registration); all
aircraft of type AN-24B RA-46388 and RA-87348
(49) helicopters Mi-8 (unknown registration); all (11)
are not operated for financial reasons; RA-46267
helicopters Mi-171 (unknown registration); all (8)
and RA-47289 and the aircraft of type AN-24RV
helicopters Mi-2 (unknown registration); all (1) heli
RA-46509, RA-46519 and RA-47800 are operated
copter EC-120B: RA-04116.
by another Russian carrier.
(l) Rossija
(STC
Russia):
aircraft
Tupolev
TU-134
regis
(d) Kavminvodyavia: aircraft Tupolev TU-154B regis
tration RA-65979, the aircraft RA-65904,
tration RA-85494 and RA-85457.
RA-65905, RA-65911, RA-65921 and RA-65555
are operated by another Russian carrier; aircraft
Ilyushin IL-18 registration RA-75454 is operated
(e) Krasnoyarsky Airlines: the aircraft of type TU-154M
by another Russian carrier; aircraft Yakovlev Yak-
RA-85672 previously on the AOC of Krasnoyarsky
40 registration RA-87203, RA-87968, RA-87971,
Airlines, which was revoked in 2009 is currently
RA-87972 and RA-88200 are operated by another
operated by Atlant Soyuz; the aircraft of the same
Russian carrier.

---

L 104/20
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
(m) Russair: aircraft Tupolev TU-134A registration
According to this report the emergency landing of DC-9-
RA 65124, RA-65908, RA-65087, RA-65790,
51 registration UR-CBY, shortly after take-off, was due to
RA-65576, RA-65102, RA-65550 and RA-65691.
engine shut down, which was most probably caused by
bird strike. However, the report also revealed that one
critical engine-inoperative procedure had not been
included in UMAir’s Manual of Operations.
(n) Kosmos: aircraft Tupolev TU-134-A3 registration
RA-65805,RA-65010, RA-65097, RA-65557,
RA-65566, TU-134-B registration RA-65574.
(91) Given that the report of a ramp inspection carried out in
the EU ( 1 ) on 28 February 2011 on aircraft UR-CHN
(o) The 224th-Flight Unit State Airlines: aircraft Ilyushin
operated by the air carrier revealed serious deficiencies,
IL-76MD registration RA-76638 and RA-78750.
the Commission requested additional information to the
air carrier. In response to this request the air carrier
provided documentation on the operations specifications
and airworthiness certificate for the aircraft MD83 regis
(p) Daghestan Airlines: aircraft Tupolev TU-134B regis
tration UR-CHN showing that it is equipped with ICAO
tration RA-65569.
mandatory equipment.
(q) Kogalymavia: aircraft Tupolev TU-134A3 regis
tration RA-65943, RA-65045, RA-65943, (92) The carrier was invited to a technical meeting on
RA65944 and RA-65944; Tupolev TU-154B2 regis
25 March 2011 to clarify the outstanding issues.
tration RA-85522.
During and following the meeting it provided details
on the results of internal audits, inspections and ramp
checks and respective corrective measures undertaken
and indicated that its current Manual of Operations
(87) The
Commission
and
the
Air
Safety
Committee
take
note
contained all necessary normal, abnormal and
of the submissions by the competent authority of the
emergency procedures and provides for recurrent
Russian Federation and will pursue the sustainable
training on simulators.
resolution of identified safety non compliances through
further technical consultations with the competent
authorities of the Russian Federation.
(93) UKR SAA requested to make presentations to the Air
Safety Committee and did so on 6 April 2011 where
it presented the process of inspections and verification
(88) In
the
meantime,
Member
States
will
continue
to
verify
the effective compliance of Russian air carriers with the
and reporting of the implementation of corrective
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
measures by the air carriers under its safety oversight,
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of these
including UMAir. UKR SAA confirmed that UMAir had
carriers pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 351/2008 and
rectified all findings identified during the EU visits in May
the Commission will continue to closely monitor the
and October 2009. UKR SAA also stated that it
actions taken by them.
continued to discharge its responsibilities as State of
Registry and State of Operator with respect to the
UMAir’s wet leasing operations.
Ukrainian Mediterranean Airlines
(89) The
air
carrier
Ukrainian
Mediterranean
Airlines
(UMAir)
(94) The
Air
Safety
Committee
welcomed
the
improvements
requested to be heard by the Air Safety Committee and
achieved by UMAir in the implementation of inter
made written submissions in advance. It informed that
national safety standards and the suspension of DC-9-
further to its fleet renewal plans the aircraft of type DC-9
51 aircraft operations, as well as the statements made
51 were not operated anymore. Also it informed that it
by the UKR SAA and considered that the operations of
had been re-certified by the Ukrainian civil aviation
this air carrier should no longer be subject to any
authority (UKR SAA) in January 2011 and that it had
restrictions. Therefore, on the basis of the common
received an AOC valid for 2 years.
criteria, it is assessed that Ukrainian Mediterranean
Airlines (UM Air) should be removed from Annex B.
(90) UMAir also provided documentation intending to
demonstrate that all corrective actions stemming from
the EU visits in May and October 2009 had been
(95) Member States will continue to verify the effective
closed. Furthermore, it provided documentation
compliance of UMAir with the relevant safety standards
regarding the verification of the status of implementation
through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be
of corrective action addressing findings raised by the
carried out on aircraft of this air carrier pursuant to
UKR SAA during surveillance activities. It has also
Regulation (EC) No 351/2008.
submitted an investigation report on a serious incident
that occurred in Beirut on 21 September 2010.
( 1 ) SCAA-2011-30.

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/21
General considerations concerning the other carriers
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
included in Annexes A and B
(96) No evidence of the full implementation of appropriate
Article 1
remedial actions by the other air carriers included in the
Community list updated on 22 November 2010 and by
Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 is amended as follows:
the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight
of these air carriers has been communicated to the
(1) Annex A is replaced by the text set out in Annex A to this
Commission so far in spite of specific requests
Regulation;
submitted by the latter. Therefore, on the basis of the
common criteria, it is assessed that these air carriers
should continue to be subject to an operating ban
(2) Annex B is replaced by the text set out in Annex B to this
(Annex A) or operating restrictions (Annex B), as the
Regulation.
case may be.
Article 2
(97) The
measures
provided
for
in
this
Regulation
are
in
accordance with the opinion of the Air Safety
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its
Committee,
publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 April 2011.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Siim KALLAS
Vice-President

---

L 104/22
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
ANNEX A
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
BLUE WING AIRLINES SRBWA-01/2002 BWI Suriname
MERIDIAN AIRWAYS LTD AOC
023 MAG Republic
of
Ghana
SILVERBACK CARGO FREIGHTERS Unknown VRB Republic
of
Rwanda
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
responsibility for regulatory oversight of
Afghanistan, including
ARIANA AFGHAN AIRLINES AOC
009 AFG Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
KAM AIR AOC
001 KMF Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
PAMIR AIRLINES Unknown PIR Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
SAFI AIRWAYS AOC
181 SFW Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Angola
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Angola,
with the exception of TAAG Angola Airlines put
in Annex B, including
AEROJET AO
008-01/11 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
AIR26 AO
003-01/11-DCD DCD Republic
of
Angola
AIR GICANGO 009 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
AIR JET AO
006-01/11-MBC MBC Republic
of
Angola
AIR NAVE 017 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
ANGOLA AIR SERVICES 006 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
DIEXIM 007 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
FLY540 AO
004-01
FLYA Unknown Republic
of
Angola
GIRA GLOBO 008 GGL Republic
of
Angola
HELIANG 010 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
HELIMALONGO AO
005-01/11 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
MAVEWA 016 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
SONAIR AO
002-01/10-SOR SOR Republic
of
Angola
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Benin
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Benin,
including
AERO BENIN PEA
No
014/
AEB Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTTATP-PR/
ANAC/DEA/SCS
AFRICA AIRWAYS Unknown AFF Republic
of
Benin
_____________
( 1 ) Air carriers listed in Annex A could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not
subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/23
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
ALAFIA JET PEA
No
014/ANAC/
N/A Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTTATP-
PR/DEA/SCS
BENIN GOLF AIR PEA
No
012/MDCTTP-
BGL Republic
of
Benin
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS
BENIN LITTORAL AIRWAYS PEA
No
013/
LTL Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTTATP-PR/
ANAC/DEA/SCS
COTAIR PEA
No
015/
COB Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTTATP-PR/
ANAC/DEA/SCS
ROYAL AIR PEA
No
11/ANAC/
BNR Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTP-PR/DEA/SCS
TRANS AIR BENIN PEA
No
016/
TNB Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTTATP-PR/
ANAC/DEA/SCS
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Congo
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Republic of Congo, including
AERO SERVICE RAC06-002 RSR Republic
of
Congo
EQUAFLIGHT SERVICES RAC
06-003 EKA Republic
of
Congo
SOCIETE NOUVELLE AIR CONGO RAC
06-004 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
TRANS AIR CONGO RAC
06-001 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)
responsibility for regulatory oversight of
Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC), including
AFRICAN AIR SERVICES COMMUTER 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
051/09
AIR KASAI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
036/08
AIR KATANGA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
031/08
AIR TROPIQUES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
029/08
BLUE AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
BUL Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
028/08
BRAVO AIR CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
BRV Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
0090/2006
BUSINESS AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
ABB Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
048/09
BUSY BEE CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
052/09
CETRACA AVIATION SERVICE 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
CER Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
026/08

---

L 104/24
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
CHC STELLAVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
0050/2006
CONGO EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
EXY Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
083/2009
COMPAGNIE AFRICAINE D’AVIATION (CAA) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
035/08
DOREN AIR CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
0032/08
ENTREPRISE WORLD AIRWAYS (EWA) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
EWS Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
003/08
FILAIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
037/08
GALAXY KAVATSI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
027/08
GILEMBE AIR SOUTENANCE (GISAIR) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
053/09
GOMA EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
0051/2006
GOMAIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
045/09
HEWA BORA AIRWAYS (HBA) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
ALX Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
038/08
INTERNATIONAL TRANS AIR BUSINESS (ITAB) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
033/08
KIN AVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
042/09
KORONGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
001/2011
LIGNES ARIENNES CONGOLAISES (LAC) Ministerial
signature
LCG Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
(ordonnance No
78/205)
MALU AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
04008
MANGO AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
034/08
SAFE AIR COMPANY 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
025/08
SERVICES AIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
030/08
SWALA AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
050/09
TMK AIR COMMUTER 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
044/09

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/25
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
TRACEP CONGO AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
046/09
TRANS AIR CARGO SERVICES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
024/08
WIMBI DIRA AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
WDA Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
039/08
ZAABU INTERNATIONAL 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
049/09
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Djibouti
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Djibouti,
including
DAALLO AIRLINES Unknown DAO Djibouti
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Equatorial Guinea
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Equatorial
Guinea, including
CRONOS AIRLINES Unknown Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
CEIBA INTERCONTINENTAL Unknown CEL Equatorial
Guinea
EGAMS Unknown EGM Equatorial
Guinea
EUROGUINEANA DE AVIACION Y TRANSPORTES 2006/001/MTTCT/ EUG Equatorial
Guinea
DGAC/SOPS
GENERAL WORK AVIACION 002/ANAC n/a Equatorial
Guinea
GETRA — GUINEA ECUATORIAL DE TRANSPORTES 739 GET Equatorial
Guinea
AEREOS
GUINEA AIRWAYS 738 n/a Equatorial
Guinea
STAR EQUATORIAL AIRLINES Unknown Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
UTAGE — UNION DE TRANSPORTE AEREO DE 737 UTG Equatorial
Guinea
GUINEA ECUATORIAL
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Indonesia
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Indonesia,
with the exception of Garuda Indonesia, Airfast
Indonesia, Mandala Airlines, Ekspres Transportasi
Antarbenua, Indonesia Air Asia and Metro
Batavia, including
AIR PACIFIC UTAMA 135-020 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ALFA TRANS DIRGANTATA 135-012 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ASCO NUSA AIR 135-022 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ASI PUDJIASTUTI 135-028 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
AVIASTAR MANDIRI 135-029 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
DABI AIR NUSANTARA 135-030 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
DERAYA AIR TAXI 135-013 DRY Republic
of
Indonesia
DERAZONA AIR SERVICE 135-010 DRZ Republic
of
Indonesia

---

L 104/26
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
DIRGANTARA AIR SERVICE 135-014 DIR Republic
of
Indonesia
EASTINDO 135-038 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
GATARI AIR SERVICE 135-018 GHS Republic
of
Indonesia
INDONESIA AIR TRANSPORT 135-034 IDA Republic
of
Indonesia
INTAN ANGKASA AIR SERVICE 135-019 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
JOHNLIN AIR TRANSPORT 135-043 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
KAL STAR 121-037 KLS Republic
of
Indonesia
KARTIKA AIRLINES 121-003 KAE Republic
of
Indonesia
KURA-KURA AVIATION 135-016 KUR Republic
of
Indonesia
LION MENTARI AIRLINES 121-010 LNI Republic
of
Indonesia
MANUNGGAL AIR SERVICE 121-020 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
MEGANTARA 121-025 MKE Republic
of
Indonesia
MERPATI NUSANTARA AIRLINES 121-002 MNA Republic
of
Indonesia
MIMIKA AIR 135-007 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NATIONAL UTILITY HELICOPTER 135-011 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NUSANTARA AIR CHARTER 121-022 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NUSANTARA BUANA AIR 135-041 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NYAMAN AIR 135-042 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PELITA AIR SERVICE 121-008 PAS Republic
of
Indonesia
PENERBANGAN ANGKASA SEMESTA 135-026 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PURA WISATA BARUNA 135-025 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
RIAU AIRLINES 121-016 RIU Republic
of
Indonesia
SAMPOERNA AIR NUSANTARA 135-036 SAE Republic
of
Indonesia
SAYAP GARUDA INDAH 135-004 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SKY AVIATION 135-044 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SMAC 135-015 SMC Republic
of
Indonesia
SRIWIJAYA AIR 121-035 SJY Republic
of
Indonesia
SURVEI UDARA PENAS 135-006 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRANSWISATA PRIMA AVIATION 135-021 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRAVEL EXPRESS AVIATION SERVICE 121-038 XAR Republic
of
Indonesia
TRAVIRA UTAMA 135-009 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRI MG INTRA ASIA AIRLINES 121-018 TMG Republic
of
Indonesia

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/27
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
TRIGANA AIR SERVICE 121-006 TGN Republic
of
Indonesia
UNINDO 135-040 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
WING ABADI AIRLINES 121-012 WON Republic
of
Indonesia
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Kazakhstan
responsibility for regulatory oversight of
Kazakhstan, with the exception of Air Astana,
including
AERO AIR COMPANY AK-0429-10 ILK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AIR ALMATY AK-0409-09 LMY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AIR TRUST AIRCOMPANY AK-0412-10 RTR Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AK SUNKAR AIRCOMPANY AK-0396-09 AKS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ASIA CONTINENTAL Airlines AK-0345-08 CID Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ASIA WINGS AK-0390-09 AWA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ATMA AIRLINES AK-0437-10 AMA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AVIA-JAYNAR/AVIA-ZHAYNAR AK-0435-10 SAP Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BEYBARS AIRCOMPANY AK-0383-09 BBS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BERKUT AIR/BEK AIR AK-0428-10 BEK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BURUNDAYAVIA AIRLINES AK-0415-10 BRY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
COMLUX AK-0399-09 KAZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
DETA AIR AK-0417-10 DET Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EAST WING AK-0411-09 EWZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EASTERN EXPRESS AK-0427-10 LIS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EURO-ASIA AIR AK-0384-09 EAK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EURO-ASIA AIR INTERNATIONAL AK-0389-09 KZE Republic
of
Kazakhstan
FLY JET KZ AK-0391-09 FJK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
INVESTAVIA AK-0342-08 TLG Republic
of
Kazakhstan
IRTYSH AIR AK-0439-11 MZA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
JET AIRLINES AK-0419-10 SOZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
JET ONE AK-0433-10 JKZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIR JET AK-0387-09 KEJ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIRTRANS AIRLINE AK-0349-09 KUY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIRWEST AK-0404-09 KAW Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAVIASPAS AK-0405-09 KZS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
MEGA AIRLINES AK-0424-10 MGK Republic
of
Kazakhstan

---

L 104/28
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
MIRAS AK-0402-09 MIF Republic
of
Kazakhstan
PRIME AVIATION AK-0393-09 PKZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SAMAL AIR AK-0407-09 SAV Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SAYAKHAT AIRLINES AK-0426-10 SAH Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SEMEYAVIA AK-400-09 SMK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SCAT AK-0420-10 VSV Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SKYBUS AK-0432-10 BYK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SKYJET AK-0398-09 SEK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
UST-KAMENOGORSK/AIR DIVISION OF EKA AK-0440-11 UCK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ZHETYSU AIRCOMPANY AK-0438-11 JTU Republic
of
Kazakhstan
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Kyrgyz Republic
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Kyrgyz Republic, including
AIR MANAS 17 MBB Kyrgyz
Republic
ASIAN AIR 36 AZZ Kyrgyz
Republic
AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY 23 AVJ Kyrgyz
Republic
AEROSTAN (EX BISTAIR-FEZ BISHKEK) 08 BSC Kyrgyz
Republic
CENTRAL ASIAN AVIATION SERVICES (CAAS) 13 CBK Kyrgyz
Republic
CLICK AIRWAYS 11 CGK Kyrgyz
Republic
DAMES 20 DAM Kyrgyz
Republic
EASTOK AVIA 15 EEA Kyrgyz
Republic
ITEK AIR 04 IKA Kyrgyz
Republic
KYRGYZ TRANS AVIA 31 KTC Kyrgyz
Republic
KYRGYZSTAN 03 LYN Kyrgyz
Republic
KYRGYZSTAN AIRLINE Unknown KGA Kyrgyz
Republic
S GROUP AVIATION
6 SGL Kyrgyz
Republic
SKY WAY AIR 21 SAB Kyrgyz
Republic
TRAST AERO 05 TSJ Kyrgyz
Republic
VALOR AIR 07 VAC Kyrgyz
Republic
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Liberia
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Liberia.
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Gabon
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Republic of Gabon, with the exception of Gabon
Airlines, Afrijet and SN2AG put in Annex B,
including

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/29
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
AFRIC AVIATION 010/MTAC/ANAC-G/
Unknown Republic
of
Gabon
DSA
AIR SERVICES SA 004/MTAC/ANAC-G/
RVS Republic
of
Gabon
DSA
AIR TOURIST (ALLEGIANCE) 007/MTAC/ANAC-G/
LGE Republic
of
Gabon
DSA
NATIONALE ET REGIONALE TRANSPORT
008/MTAC/ANAC-G/
NRG Republic
of
Gabon
(NATIONALE)
DSA
SCD AVIATION 005/MTAC/ANAC-G/
SCY Republic
of
Gabon
DSA
SKY GABON 009/MTAC/ANAC-G/
SKG Republic
of
Gabon
DSA
SOLENTA AVIATION GABON 006/MTAC/ANAC-G/
Unknown Republic
of
Gabon
DSA
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Islamic Republic of Mauritania
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Republic of Mauritania, including
MAURITANIA AIRWAYS MTW Islamic
Republic
of
Mauritania
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Mozambique
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Republic of Mozambique, including
MOZAMBIQUE AIRLINES — LINHAS AEREAS DE MOZ-01/2010 LAM Republic
of
Mozambique
MOAMBIQUE
MOZAMBIQUE EXPRESS/MEX 02
of
2010 MXE Republic
of
Mozambique
TRANS AIRWAYS/KAYA AIRLINES 03
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
HELICOPTEROS CAPITAL Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CFA MOZAMBIQUE Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
UNIQUE AIR CHARTER Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
AEROVISAO DE MOZAMBIQUE Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
SAFARI AIR Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
ETA AIR CHARTER LDA 04
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
EMILIO AIR CHARTER LDA 05
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CFM-TTA SA 07
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
AERO-SERVICOS SARL 08
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
VR CROPSPRAYERS LDA 06
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of the Philippines
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Philippines, including
AEROWURKS AERIAL SPRAYING SERVICES 2010030 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIR PHILIPPINES CORPORATION 2009006 GAP Republic
of
the
Philippines

---

L 104/30
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
AIR WOLF AVIATION INC. 200911 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIRTRACK AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION 2010027 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ASIA AIRCRAFT OVERSEAS PHILIPPINES INC. 4AN9800036 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AVIATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATORS, INC. 4AN2007005 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AVIATOUR’S FLY’N INC. 200910 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AYALA AVIATION CORP. 4AN9900003 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
BEACON Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
BENDICE TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT INC. 4AN2008006 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CANADIAN HELICOPTERS PHILIPPINES INC. 4AN9800025 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CEBU PACIFIC AIR 2009002 CEB Republic
of
the
Philippines
CHEMTRAD AVIATION CORPORATION 2009018 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CM AERO 4AN2000001 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CORPORATE AIR Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CYCLONE AIRWAYS 4AN9900008 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
FAR EAST AVIATION SERVICES 2009013 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
F.F. CRUZ AND COMPANY, INC. 2009017 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
HUMA CORPORATION 2009014 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
INAEC AVIATION CORP. 4AN2002004 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ISLAND AVIATION 2009009 SOY Republic
of
the
Philippines
ISLAND TRANSVOYAGER 2010022 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
LION AIR, INCORPORATED 2009019 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
MACRO ASIA AIR TAXI SERVICES 2010029 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
MINDANAO RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL
2009016 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MISIBIS AVIATION & DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2010020 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
OMNI AVIATION CORP. 2010033 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
PACIFIC EAST ASIA CARGO AIRLINES, INC. 4AS9800006 PEC Republic
of
the
Philippines
PACIFIC AIRWAYS CORPORATION 4AN9700007 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
PACIFIC ALLIANCE CORPORATION 4AN2006001 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 2009001 PAL Republic
of
the
Philippines
PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL AVIATION CORP. 4AN9800015 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ROYAL AIR CHARTER SERVICES INC. 2010024 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ROYAL STAR AVIATION, INC. 2010021 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/31
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
SOUTH EAST ASIA INC. 2009004 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SOUTHSTAR AVIATION COMPANY, INC. 4AN9800037 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SPIRIT OF MANILA AIRLINES CORPORATION 2009008 MNP Republic
of
the
Philippines
SUBIC INTERNATIONAL AIR CHARTER 4AN9900010 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SUBIC SEAPLANE, INC. 4AN2000002 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
TOPFLITE AIRWAYS, INC. 4AN9900012 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
TRANSGLOBAL AIRWAYS CORPORATION 2009007 TCU Republic
of
the
Philippines
WORLD AVIATION, CORP. Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
WCC AVIATION COMPANY 2009015 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
YOKOTA AVIATION, INC. Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ZENITH AIR, INC. 2009012 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ZEST AIRWAYS INCORPORATED 2009003 RIT Republic
of
the
Philippines
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Sao Tome and Principe
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sao
Tome and Principe, including
AFRICA CONNECTION 10/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
BRITISH GULF INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LTD 01/AOC/2007 BGI Sao
Tome
and
Principe
EXECUTIVE JET SERVICES 03/AOC/2006 EJZ Sao
Tome
and
Principe
GLOBAL AVIATION OPERATION 04/AOC/2006 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
GOLIAF AIR 05/AOC/2001 GLE Sao
Tome
and
Principe
ISLAND OIL EXPLORATION 01/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
STP AIRWAYS 03/AOC/2006 STP Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSAFRIK INTERNATIONAL LTD 02/AOC/2002 TFK Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSCARG 01/AOC/2009 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSLIZ AVIATION (TMS) 02/AOC/2007 TMS Sao
Tome
and
Principe
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Sierra Leone
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sierra
Leone, including
AIR RUM, LTD Unknown RUM Sierra
Leone
DESTINY AIR SERVICES, LTD Unknown DTY Sierra
Leone
HEAVYLIFT CARGO Unknown Unknown Sierra
Leone
ORANGE AIR SIERRA LEONE LTD Unknown ORJ Sierra
Leone
PARAMOUNT AIRLINES, LTD Unknown PRR Sierra
Leone
SEVEN FOUR EIGHT AIR SERVICES LTD Unknown SVT Sierra
Leone

---

L 104/32
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
ICAO airline designation
AOC (and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) number or operating
licence number
number
State of the operator
TEEBAH AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Sierra
Leone
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Sudan
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sudan,
including
SUDAN AIRWAYS Unknown SUD Republic
of
the
Sudan
SUN AIR COMPANY 051 SNR Republic
of
the
Sudan
MARSLAND COMPANY 040 MSL Republic
of
the
Sudan
ATTICO AIRLINES 023 ETC Republic
of
the
Sudan
FOURTY EIGHT AVIATION 054 WHB Republic
of
the
Sudan
SUDANESE STATES AVIATION COMPANY 010 SNV Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALMAJARA AVIATION Unknown MJA Republic
of
the
Sudan
BADER AIRLINES 035 BDR Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALFA AIRLINES 054 AAJ Republic
of
the
Sudan
AZZA TRANSPORT COMPANY 012 AZZ Republic
of
the
Sudan
GREEN FLAG AVIATION 017 Unkown Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALMAJAL AVIATION SERVICE 015 MGG Republic
of
the
Sudan
NOVA AIRLINES 001 NOV Republic
of
the
Sudan
TARCO AIRLINES 056 Unknown Republic
of
the
Sudan
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Swaziland
responsibility for regulatory oversight of
Swaziland, including
SWAZILAND AIRLINK Unknown SZL Swaziland
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Zambia
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Zambia,
including
ZAMBEZI AIRLINES Z/AOC/001/2009 ZMA Zambia

---

EN
20.4.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
104/33
ANNEX B
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS
WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
designation
State of the operator Aircraft
type
restricted
when available,
State of registry
AOC (and its trading
(AOC) number
number
construction serial
name, if different)
number(s)
AIR KORYO GAC-AOC/KOR-01 KOR DPRK All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the DPRK
exception of: 2 exception of: P-632,
aircraft of type P-633
TU- 204
AFRIJET ( 1 ) 002/MTAC/ANAC-G/
ABS Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon
DSA
exception of: 2 exception of: TR-LGV;
aircraft of type TR-LGY; TR-AFJ;
Falcon 50, 2 TR-AFR
aircraft of type
Falcon 900
AIR ASTANA ( 2 ) AK-0388-09 KZR Kazakhstan All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Aruba (Kingdom of
exception of: 2 exception of: P4-KCA, the Netherlands)
aircraft of type
P4-KCB, P4-EAS,
B-767, 4 aircraft P4-FAS, P4-GAS,
of type B-757, 10 P4-MAS; P4-NAS,
aircraft of type P4-OAS, P4-PAS,
A319/320/321, 5 P4-SAS, P4-TAS,
aircraft of type P4-UAS, P4-VAS,
Fokker 50
P4-WAS, P4-YAS,
P4-XAS; P4-HAS,
P4-IAS, P4-JAS,
P4-KAS, P4-LAS
AIRLIFT INTER AOC 017 ALE Republic
of
Ghana All
fleet
with
the All fleet with the Republic of Ghana
NATIONAL (GH)
exception of: 2 exception of: 9G-TOP
LTD
aircraft of type and 9G-RAC
DC8-63F
AIR
5R-M01/2009 MDG Madagascar All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Republic of
MADAGASCAR
exception of: 2 exception of:
Madagascar
aircraft of type 5R-MFH, 5R-MFI,
Boeing B-737-
5R-MJE, 5R-MJF,
300, 2 aircraft of 5R-MJG, 5R-MVT,
type ATR 72-500, 5R-MGC, 5R-MGD,
1 aircraft of type 5R-MGF
ATR 42-500, 1
aircraft of type
ATR 42-320 and
3 aircraft of type
DHC 6-300
AIR SERVICE
06-819/TA-15/
KMD Comoros All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Comoros
COMORES
DGACM
exception of: LET exception of: D6-
410 UVP
CAM (851336)
GABON
001/MTAC/ANAC GBK Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon
AIRLINES ( 3 )
exception of: 1 exception of: TR-LHP
aircraft of type
Boeing B-767-200
_____________
( 1 ) Air carriers listed in Annex B could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not
subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

---

L 104/34
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
20.4.2011
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its
Air operator certificate
designation
State of the operator Aircraft
type
restricted
when available,
State of registry
AOC (and its trading
(AOC) number
number
construction serial
name, if different)
number(s)
IRAN AIR ( 4 ) FS100 IRA Islamic
Republic
of
All fleet with the All fleet with the Islamic Republic of
Iran
exception of:
exception of:
Iran
14 aircraft of type EP-IBA
A-300, 8 aircraft EP-IBB
of type A-310, 1
aircraft B-737
EP-IBC
EP-IBD
EP-IBG
EP-IBH
EP-IBI
EP-IBJ
EP-IBM
EP-IBN
EP-IBO
EP-IBS
EP-IBT
EP-IBV
EP-IBX
EP-IBZ
EP-ICE
EP-ICF
EP-IBK
EP-IBL
EP-IBP
EP-IBQ
EP-AGA
NOUVELLE AIR
003/MTAC/ANAC-G/
NVS Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon;
AFFAIRES GABON DSA
exception of: 1 exception of:
Republic of South
(SN2AG)
aircraft of type TR-AAG, ZS-AFG
Africa
Challenger
CL-601, 1 aircraft
of type HS-125-
800
TAAG ANGOLA
001 DTA Republic
of
Angola All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Angola
AIRLINES
exception of: 3 exception of:
aircraft of type D2-TED, D2-TEE,
Boeing B-777 and D2-TEF, D2-TBF,
4 aircraft of type D2-TBG, D2-TBH,
Boeing B-737-700 D2-TBJ
( 1 ) Afrijet is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Union.
( 2 ) Air Astana is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Union.
( 3 ) Gabon Airlines is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Community.
( 4 ) Iran Air is allowed to operate to the European Union using the specific aircraft under the conditions set out in recital 69 Regulation (EU) No 590/2010, OJ L 170,
6.7.2010, p. 15.

---