HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"L 303/14
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1197/2011
of 21 November 2011
amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are
subject to an operating ban within the Community
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Member States, to submit written comments and to
make an oral presentation to the Commission within
10 working days and to the Air Safety Committee estab
lished by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/1991 of 16
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
December on the harmonization of the technical
Union,
requirements and administrative procedures in the field
of civil aviation ( 3 ).
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the
European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005
on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject
(5) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
heard
presentations
by
to an operating ban within the Community and on informing
EASA about the results of the analysis of audit reports
air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and
carried out by the International Civil Aviation Organi
repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE ( 1 ), and in particular
sation (ICAO) in the framework of the comprehensive
Article 4 thereof ( 2 ),
USOAP programme as well as technical assistance
projects carried out in countries affected by Regulation
(EC) No 2111/2005. It has been informed about the
requests for further technical assistance and cooperation
Whereas:
to improve the administrative and technical capability of
civil aviation authorities with a view to resolving any non
compliance with applicable international standards
(1) Commission
Regulation
(EC)
No
474/2006
of
22
March
2006 established the Community list of air carriers
which are subject to an operating ban within the
Union referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No
(6) Regulation
(EC)
No
474/2006
should
be
therefore
2111/2005.
amended accordingly,


(2) In
accordance
with
Article
4(3)
of
Regulation
(EC)
No (7) The
measures
provided
for
in
this
Regulation
are
in
2111/2005, some Member States and the European
accordance with the opinion of the Air Safety
Aviation Safety Agency (hereinafter
"EASA")
Committee,
communicated to the Commission information that is
relevant in the context of updating the Community list.
Relevant information was also communicated by third
countries. On this basis, the Community list should be
updated.
European Union air carriers
(8) Following
the
analysis
by
EASA
of
information
resulting
from SAFA ramp checks carried out on aircraft of certain
(3) The
Commission
informed
all
air
carriers
concerned
Union air carriers or from standardisation inspections
either directly or, when this was not practicable,
carried out by EASA as well as area specific inspections
through the authorities responsible for their regulatory
and audits carried out by their national aviation
oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations
authorities, some Member States have taken certain
which would form the basis for a decision to impose on
enforcement measures. They informed the Commission
them an operating ban within the Union or to modify
and the Air Safety Committee about these measures:
the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air
Cyprus decided to revoke on 5 August 2011 the AOC
carrier which is included in the Community list.
of the air carrier Eurocypria Airlines; Italy informed the
air transport license held by the air carriers Livingston
and ItaliAirlines remain suspended; France decided to
revoke the AOC of Blue Line on 6 October 2010.
(4)
Opportunity was given by the Commission to the air
Greece decided to revoke the AOC of First Airways on
carriers concerned to consult documents provided by
21 October 2010, to revoke the AOC of Athens Airways
on 20 July 2011, to revoke the AOC of Air Go Airlines
( 1 ) OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p. 15
( 2 ) OJ L 143, 30.4.2004 p. 76
( 3 ) OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/15
on 2 September 2011, to revoke the AOC of Argo
performance of this air carrier and were increasing
Airways on 9 September 2011, to limit the validity of
oversight. AESA, from their own audits and inspections,
the license of the air carrier Hellenic Imperial Airways to
had determined that the other Spanish air carriers that
five months until 2 February 2012 as a result of the on-
had had some poor results from SAFA inspections did
going heightened surveillance of its air operations and its
not present any immediate safety risk but would
maintenance; the United Kingdom confirmed that the
continue to be subject to enhanced oversight.
enhanced surveillance activity of the air carriers
Jet2.com, Oasis and Titan Airways has not revealed
further safety concerns; the Netherlands decided to
suspend the AOC of Solid-air on 28 September and to
suspend the AOC of Amsterdam Airlines on 4 November
(11) AESA
also
briefed
that
the
AOCs
of
Baleares
Link
Express
2011; Germany decided to revoke the AOC of ACH
and Eurocontinental had been revoked on 27 June 2011.
Hamburg GmbH on 29 June 2011. Furthermore,
pending the expected reinforcement of the staffing of
the LBA in 2012, the LBA are continuing to focus
their oversight on those air carriers identified as pres
enting higher risks; Portugal informed that the AOC of
(12) During
the
meeting
of
the
Air
Safety
Committee
AESA
the air carrier Luzair expired on 19 September 2011 and
updated the Committee on further actions taken. They
is in the process of recertification, and that, as the
informed that the AOC of Zorex S.A. had been
enhanced surveillance of White Airways has not
suspended on 7 November 2011, that the air carrier
revealed safety concerns, the air carrier has returned
Alba Star had been subject to specific inspections on
under normal surveillance; finally Sweden decided to
24 October 2011 with no significant discrepancies
suspend on 16 September 2011 the AOCs of the air
detected, and that the last two SAFA inspections had
carrier Flyg Centrum AB and the air carriers Nova Air
no findings. Furthermore, the air carrier IMD Airways
and AirSweden Aviation AB have submitted corrective
S.L. had been subject to a series of inspections on 20,
action plans which are being examined by the
24 October and 3, 4 November 2011 with no significant
competent authorities of Sweden; in the meantime
findings.
these air carriers remain under enhanced surveillance.
(13) Given the actions undertaken by AESA in addressing the
identified safety deficiencies of Spanish air carriers it is
Air carriers from Spain
assessed that, currently, the operations of these air
carriers are sufficiently controlled by that authority to
(9) Following
the
adoption
of
Commission
Implementing
avoid any serious risks to safety and therefore no
Regulation (EU) No390/2011 on 19 April 2011 ( 1 ),
further action is necessary. Meanwhile the Commission,
two subsequent regular analyses of SAFA inspection
in co- operation with EASA, will continue to monitor the
data by EASA continues to show a high number of air
safety performance of Spanish air carriers.
carriers licensed in Spain with results from SAFA
inspections of more than one major finding per
inspection. As a result the Commission continued the
formal consultations with the competent authorities of
Spain (AESA) which were launched on 14 March 2011.
Air carriers from Albania
(14) ICAO carried out a comprehensive safety audit of
Albania under its Universal Safety Oversight Audit
Programme (USOAP) in December 2009. This audit
reported a large number of significant deficiencies with
(10) At
a
meeting
on
19
October
2011,
AESA
briefed
the
regard to the capability of the competent authorities of
Commission on the actions taken to date to address the
Albania to discharge their air safety oversight responsi
identified safety issues with Spanish air carriers in a
bilities. At the time of the issuance of the final report
sustainable manner. In particular, AESA informed the
stemming from this audit, more than 59 % of ICAO
Commission that the air carrier Flightline, following
standards were considered by ICAO as not effectively
corrective actions by the company, had its AOC
implemented. On certain critical elements such as the
renewed, but limited to exclude the aircraft of type
resolution of safety concerns, more than 80 % of ICAO
Metro III. In the case of the air carrier Zorex S.A.,
standards were not effectively implemented. In addition,
AESA had launched suspension action and provisional
the competent authorities of Albania failed to propose
measures to prevent operations in May 2011. After
adequate corrective action plans, as demonstrated by the
remedial actions by the company the measures were
fact that more than 90 % of the corrective actions
lifted. However, following further evidence that the air
submitted by these authorities to ICAO in August
carrier was not satisfactorily addressing safety concerns a
2010 in the fields of legislation, organisation, licensing,
new suspension procedure was commenced on
operations, airworthiness and accident/incident investi
7 October 2011. Concerning the air carrier Alba Star,
gation have not been considered acceptable by ICAO.
AESA had already detected issues with the safety
Furthermore, the competent authorities of Albania have
failed to report the implementation of the above
( 1 ) OJ L 104, 20.4.2011, p. 10
mentioned corrective action plans.

---

L 303/16
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
(15) EASA carried out a comprehensive standardisation
field of air operations, EASA concludes that four non-
inspection of Albania in January 2010. The final report
compliance findings stemming from the inspection of
of this inspection revealed significant deficiencies in all
January 2010 were not adequately addressed by the
areas audited that needed to be immediately remedied.
competent authorities of Albania and that two additional
EASA informed however that the competent authorities
were not satisfactorily closed contrary to previous
of Albania (ACAA) had presented a comprehensive
statements of the competent authorities of Albania ( 4 ),
action plan that had been found acceptable and had
five of these findings being classified by EASA as
been agreed on 29 April 2010 and a series of remedial
affecting the safety. Accordingly, the competent
actions to be implemented progressively until the end of
authorities of Albania have not been in a position to
2011, with immediate actions to address the safety defi
discharge effectively their responsibilities regarding the
ciencies. Further to the hearings of the ACAA before the
oversight of air operations as ACAA has not hired
Air Safety Committees held in March ( 1 ) and June
sufficient qualified staff for that purpose and that the
2010 ( 2 ) respectively, the competent authorities of
contracts established previously with external staff to
Albania were urged to take the necessary actions to
compensate this situation have been disrupted.
continue to implement effectively and timely the action
Consequently, the implementation of the air operations'
plans agreed with EASA, with priority to the resolution
legislation in force in Albania and the oversight of the
of the deficiencies identified that raise safety concerns if
certificate holders is not robust and many safety critical
not promptly corrected. It was in particular indicated that
elements are not overseen.
it was of utmost importance to accelerate the capacity
building of the authority and to ensure the safety
oversight of all air carriers certified in Albania in
accordance with the applicable safety regulations and to
take enforcement measures as necessary.
(17) The
competent
authorities
of
Italy,
which
had
embarked
on an extensive twinning project with the competent
authorities of Albania since September 2010, informed
that these authorities, due to a lack of competent
personnel, did make so far little use of the assistance
offered to build up their technical and administrative
(16) EASA continued actively
the consultations with the
capacity.
competent authorities of Albania to follow-up the
corrective action plans presented by these authorities in
order to remedy the significant deficiencies identified by
EASA during the comprehensive standardisation
inspection of Albania carried out in January 2010. To
that end, EASA carried out in July 2011 follow-up
(18) Given
what
precedes,
the
Commission
continued
actively
inspections in the fields of airworthiness and air
the consultations with ACAA, requesting information
operations. The final reports arising from these
regarding the safety oversight of air carriers licensed in
inspections, which were addressed to the ACAA on
Albania to be submitted in writing by 11 October 2011.
10 August and 2 September 2011 respectively, reveal
Further consultations were held on 21 October 2011
not only that the corrective action plans agreed have
with the competent authorities of France and Italy and
not been timely implemented, but that also new defi
the support of EASA. The ACAA were also invited to the
ciencies had been reported. In the field of airworthiness,
Air Safety Committee and heard on 9 November 2011.
EASA concludes that three non-compliance findings
ACAA did not provide further information on the
stemming from the inspection of January 2010 were
actions undertaken to resolve the deficiencies reported
not adequately addressed by the competent authorities
by ICAO, nor evidence that all the deficiencies identified
of Albania and that three additional ones were not satis
by EASA in its standardisation inspections had been
factorily closed contrary to previous statements of the
timely resolved or were subject to corrective actions
competent authorities of Albania (
acceptable to EASA. EASA confirmed that only a

3 ), four of these
findings being classified by EASA as affecting the
limited number of actions were considered acceptable
safety. Accordingly, the ACAA have not been in a
and only in the field of operations. The competent
position to discharge their responsibilities regarding the
authorities of Albania confirmed that they do not have
oversight of airworthiness as ACAA does not hired
any qualified inspectors and continue to rely solely on
qualified staff for that purpose and that the contracts
three external consultants, contracted indirectly, working
established previously with external staff to compensate
part time only and on short term basis until December
this situation have expired since January 2011.
2011, to discharge on their behalf their oversight respon
Consequently, there was no oversight neither of the
sibilities. ACAA failed however to demonstrate the
airworthiness legislation in force in Albania nor of the
continuity of oversight as well as the absence of
certificate holders at the time of the inspection. In the
conflict of interest of the contracted agents. ACAA also
failed to provide the extent of surveillance activities
carried out in the field of airworthiness and
( 1 ) Recitals (55) to (58) of Regulation (EC) No 273/2010 of 30 March
2010, OJ L 84, 31.03.2010, p. 30.
( 2 ) Recitals (24) to (30) of Regulation (EC) No 590/2010 of 5 July
( 4 ) EASA standardisation inspection OPS.AL.06.2011, 4 non-
2010, OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 9.
compliance findings open, reference F3(d) in relation to the
( 3 ) EASA standardisation inspection AIR.AL.06.2011, 6 non-compliance
training programmes, F4(d) in relation to the inspection manual,
findings open, reference AL#10418(d), 10419(d), 10423(c),
F7(c) in relation to the SSP, F9(d) in relation to the continuing
10426(c), 10427(d), 10428(d)
oversight

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/17
acknowledged that the safety oversight had been
the withdrawal with immediate effect of the Certificate of
disrupted for several months in 2010/2011 due to
Airworthiness of the aircraft with registration marks ZA-
difficulties experienced with the contracts of these
ARD operated until that date by Belle Air and of its
experts.
immediate grounding until the completion of the
certification process of this aircraft is completed. The
Air Safety Committee took note of this decision of the
(19) The
competent
authorities
of
Albania
however
declared
competent authorities of Albania.
that the basic law establishing the ACAA was modified
on 10 November 2011 to allow for more substantial
financial independence and better employments
(22) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee
conditions for the staff and that subsequently an inter
acknowledge the efforts made to reform the civil
national call for tender for technical assistance over five
aviation system in Albania, in particular the estab
years is being organised, with a view to have contracts
lishment of a new legislative framework in line with
signed early 2012. They recognised that the use of
international and European safety standards, the efforts
externally contracted staff does not replace the need to
undertaken to address the safety deficiencies reported by
recruit full time qualified inspectors within the authority
ICAO, EASA and those identified in the course of the
to enable it to control the safety oversight functions and
consultations, as well as the enforcement actions adopted
committed to recruit such staff as soon as practically
by ACAA and the commitment to hire without delay
possible.
qualified inspectors on a permanent basis.
(20) The air carrier Albanian Airlines certified in Albania was
(23) ACAA
also formally requested
the assistance of the
invited to the Air Safety Committee and heard on
competent authority of Italy, in the framework of an
9 November 2011 in the presence of ACAA. Whilst
established cooperation arrangement between these
the AOC was extended on 17 June 2011 to add a
authorities, in order to strengthen the administrative
third aircraft of type BAE-146 with registration mark
and technical capabilities of ACAA regarding the safety
ZA-MAN, no evidence was provided that ex-ante verifi
oversight, in particular in the field of air operations. The
cations had been conducted by the competent authorities
competent authorities of Italy informed the Air Safety
of Albania prior to the issuance of the certificate of
Committee of their readiness to put in place this
airworthiness and the addition of the aircraft on the
programme without delay, so as to enable the ACAA
AOC. In addition, whilst the AOC was renewed on
to exercise effectively the oversight of the air carriers
27 July 2011 by the competent authorities of Albania,
under its regulatory control until such time the ACAA
no evidence could be provided that ex-ante verifications
has the necessary qualified staff to do so independently.
had been conducted in the field of airworthiness prior to
the renewal; with regard to operations, the ex-ante verifi
cations were also limited. Although Albanian Airlines has
established a functioning quality management system, no
(24) In
the
light
of
these
developments,
it
is
assessed
that,
on
evidence was provided that all the deficiencies identified
the basis of the common criteria, that no further are
by ACAA and EASA in 2011 had been timely corrected,
measures needed at that stage. Member States will
in particular those related to the operations manual and
however verify effective compliance with the relevant
the training of the flight and cabin crew. The ACAA
safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp
informed and provided written evidence on 10
inspections on aircraft of air carriers certified in
November of the revocation with immediate effect the
Albania pursuant to Regulation No 351/2008.
AOC of the air carrier Albanian Airlines. The Air Safety
Committee took note of this decision of the competent
authorities of Albania.
(25) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee
encourage Albania to make decisive progress in the
build up of the technical and administrative capacity of
(21) The
air
carrier
Belle
Air
certified
in
Albania
was
invited
ACAA and invites ACAA to cooperate fully and trans
to the Air Safety Committee and heard on 9 November
parently with ICAO and EASA in order to demonstrate
2011 in the presence of ACAA. Belle Air indicated that,
quick and substantial progress in the implementation of
out of the five aircraft operated, only one aircraft of type
adequate corrective action plans to remedy all defi
Boeing DC-9-82, is registered in Albania, the other
ciencies identified. The Commission and the Air Safety
aircraft of type Airbus A318/319/320/321 and ATR72
Committee will reassess the situation in due time.
being registered in France under registration marks F-
ORAA, F-ORAD, F-ORAE, F-ORAG. Belle Air demon
strated that the aircraft registered in France are
TAAG Angolan Airlines
managed by a contracted continuing airworthiness
management organisation approved by the competent
(26) As
per
Regulation
(EC)
No
273/2010
( 1 ) TAAG Angolan
authorities of France and these confirmed the
Airlines certified in Angola is allowed to operate in the
airworthiness and the licensing of the related crew
EU only with four aircraft of type Boeing 737-700 with
remain under their safety oversight. Belle Air also
registration marks D2-TBF, D2-TBG, D2-TBH and D2-
demonstrated it had established internal controls of its
TBJ and with three aircraft of type Boeing 777-200
activities, in particular through safety and quality
management systems. The ACAA informed and
( 1 ) Commission Regulation (EC) No 273/2010 of 30 March 2010, OJ
provided written evidence on 10 November 2011 of
L 84, 31.3.2010, p. 25, see in particular paragraphs (59) to (68).

---

L 303/18
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
with registration marks D2-TED, D2-TEE, D2-TEF. TAAG
ensuring the deficiencies identified in the course of the
informed that following the renewal of its fleet the
SAFA programme have been remedied. The Commission
aircraft of type Boeing B747 were completely phased
will continue its consultations with the competent
out and replaced in June/July 2011 by two aircraft of
authorities of Saudi Arabia to follow-up that case.
type Boeing 777-300 with registration mark D2-TEG and
D2-TEH; TAAG requested these aircraft to be equally
allowed to fly in the EU.
Pakistan International Airways
(32) The
Commission
entered
into
consultations
with
the
(27) TAAG Angolan Airlines made written submissions and
competent authorities of Pakistan on 8 September
was heard by the Air Safety Committee on 9 November
2011 in order to resolve the findings in the area of
2011. TAAG demonstrated its ability to ensure safe,
airworthiness raised during numerous ramp
secure and on-time operations of aircraft of type
inspections ( 2 ) on aircraft operated by Pakistan Inter
Boeing B777-200 and 777-300.
national Airways PIA into the Union since September
2010. These consultations were launched as a result of
an analysis of these SAFA inspections by EASA and in
particular a SAFA inspection conducted by the
(28) The
competent
authorities
of
Angola
(INAVIC)
confirmed
competent authorities of France ( 3 ) on an aircraft of
to the Air Safety Committee and provided evidence that
type Airbus A310 with registration mark AP-BGO
the extension of TAAG’s fleet to the aircraft of type
which resulted in the aircraft having to be ferried
B777-300 was duly approved; INAVIC also stated that
empty to Pakistan for remedial maintenance actions.
the air carrier is subject to continuous oversight, and that
no safety concern has been identified in the course of
this surveillance. With regard to the incident that
occurred in December 2010 over Lisbon and Lunad,
(33) In
their
reply
of
17
September
2011,
the
competent
the on-going investigations by the competent authorities
authorities of Pakistan (PCAA) provided information
have not revealed deficiencies in the operations or main
concerning actions taken by them to address the
tenance of TAAG nor led to specific recommendations to
detected non-compliances. The response included details
the company.
of a corrective action plan (CAP), produced by PIA,

which set out 15 specific actions the air carrier
planned to take, the majority of which were due to
have been completed by 30 October 2011.
(29) The
competent
authorities
of
Portugal
reported
that
no
safety concern had been identified in the ramp
inspections carried out in Portugal on aircraft operated
(34) On 31 October 2011 the PCAA updated the
by TAAG.
Commission on the progress made by PIA in completing
their corrective action plan, and on actions carried out by
the PCAA. Of the fifteen actions in the PIA CAP, eight
(30) On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
had been completed and the remainder were due to be
TAAG should be allowed to operate into the EU the
completed no later than 15 December 2011. The PCAA
additional two aircraft of type Boeing B777-300ER
had introduced a thirteen point plan to address the safety
with registration marks D2-TEG and D2-TEH that
culture of PIA, the airworthiness status of their aircraft,
should be consequently added to Annex B. The
and actions to achieve systemic improvements in the
operations of this carrier into the European Union
airline.
should continue to be subject to appropriate verification
of effective compliance with the relevant safety standards
through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be
(35) Member
States
encourage
the
Commission
to
pursue
its
carried out on aircraft of this air carrier pursuant to
consultation with the competent authorities of Pakistan
Regulation No 351/2008.
and with the air carrier with a view to ensuring that any
corrective and remedial actions are sustainable in the
long term. To that end member States shall continue
Al Wafeer Air
to verify the effective compliance with relevant safety
(31) Following the analysis by EASA of the results of SAFA
( 2 ) AESA-E-2010-632, AESA-E-2011-361, AESA-E-2011-361, AESA-E-
ramp checks ( 1 ) carried out on aircraft operated into the
2011-455, AESA-E-2011-581, AESA-E-2011-701, CAA-N-2010-
EU by the air carrier Al Wafeer Air certified in Saudi
102, CAA-N-2010-119, CAA-N-2010-120, CAA-N-2011-5, CAA-
Arabia, revealing repetitive serious non compliances
N-2011-24, CAA-N-2011-38, CAA-UK-2010-918, CAA-UK-2010-
with international safety standards, the Commission
958, CAA-UK-2010-1083, CAA-UK-2011-114, CAA-UK-2011-185,
CAA-UK-2011-187, CAA-UK-2011-326, CAA-UK-2011-398, CAA-
entered on 5 August 2011 into formal consultations
UK-2011-664, CAA-UK-2011-751, CAADK-2010-62, DGAC/
with the competent authorities of Saudi Arabia. These
F-2010-2034, DGAC/F-2010-2214, DGAC/F-2010-2518, DGAC/
informed on 14 September that the AOC of Al Wafeer
F-2010-2639, DGAC/F-2011-376, DGAC/F-2011-608, DGAC/
Air had been suspended and provided assurance that the
F-2011-878, DGAC/F-2011-1138, DGAC/F-2011-1370, DGAC/
operations would not be allowed to resume without
F-2011-1560, DGAC/F-2011-1777, DGAC/F-2011-1811, DGAC/
F-2011-2084, ENAC-IT-2011-219, ENAC-IT-2011-569, LBA/
D-2010-1573, LBA/D-2011-534, LBA/D-2011-721, LBA/D-2011-
( 1 ) DGAC/F-2010-2383, DGAC/F-2010-2540, DGAC/F-2010-2298,
1003
CAA-UK-2010-0993
( 3 ) DGAC/F-2011-1811

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/19
standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections
on 15.07.2011, AVIAENERGO (ICAO designator
to be carried out on aircraft of this carrier pursuant to
ERG), revocation on 18.07.2011, CONTINENT
Regulation (EC) No 351/2008 in order to confirm, or
(ICAO designator CNE) revocation on
otherwise, the effectiveness of PIA's remedial actions.
2.08.2011 in connection with statements by the
Should however these inspection reveal that PIA
operators concerned;
actions have failed to address the identified safety
concerns, the Commission will have no choice but to
act to contain any risks to safety.
— RUSAIR (ICAO designator CGI) revocation on
13.07.2011 on the basis of facts following the
Air carriers from the Russian Federation
accident on 20.06.2011 of the aircraft of type

TU-134 operated by the air carrier;
(36) Following
two subsequent regular analyses of SAFA
inspection data by EASA where various air carriers
licensed in the Russian Federation continue to show
results from SAFA inspections of greater than one
— YAK SERVICE (ICAO designator AKY) revocation
major finding per inspection as well as the fact that
on 23.09.2011 the basis of the facts following
some of these air carriers experienced fatal accidents in
the accident on 7 September 2011 of the aircraft
2011, the Commission held consultations with the
of type YAK-42 operated by the air carrier and
competent authorities of the Russian Federation (Federal
the results of an inspection carried out on the air
Air Transport Agency of the Russian Federation – FATA)
carrier by FATA on 22.09.2011;
in the margins of the EU-Russia Aviation Summit
organised in St. Petersburg on 12 and 13 October 2011.
— AEROSTARZ (ICAO designator ASE), revocation
on 28.10.2011, AVIANOVA (ICAO designator
(37) In
order
to
provide
detailed
information
regarding
the
VNV), revocation on 10.10.2011, KAVMINVO
safety performance of air carriers operating into the
DYAVIA (ICAO designator MVD) revocation on
Union and the safety of operations of certain types of
27.09.2011 following the results of inspections
aircraft involved in fatal accidents of Russian air carriers
carried out on these air carriers by FATA on
in the Russian Federation in 2010 and 2011 further
20.10.2011, 4.10.2011 and 27.09.2011
consultations were held with these authorities on 27
respectively;
October. Also during these consultations, two air
carriers certified by these authorities VIM AVIA (VIM
AIRLINES) and TATARSTAN AIRLINES were heard by
the Commission, EASA, Eurocontrol and a Member State.
— SKY EXPRESS (ICAO designator SXR) revocation
on 31.10.2011 following industrial indicators,
the financial condition of the air carrier and the
(38) During
these
consultations
FATA
informed
that
certain
results of an inspection carried out on the air
types of aircraft – Tupolev TU-134 and Tupolev TU-
carrier by FATA on 6.10.2011;
154B-2 and TU-154M operated by certain Russian air
carriers were subject to various measures involving
their continuing airworthiness, mandatory airworthiness
— AERORENT (ICAO designator NRO) revocation
information of equipment fitted thereon, as well as
on 07.11.2011 following no compliance with
procedures for their operations. FATA also informed
certification requirements and the results of the
the Commission that certain equipment mandatory for
inspection carried out by FATA on 27.09.2011;
international flights (GPWS/TAWS) were made obligatory
also for domestic flights within the Russian Federation as
of 1 January 2012.
(b) The following 6 air carriers operating commercial air
transport into the Union had their AOCs modified
(39) At the meeting of the Air Safety Committee on
with the imposition of operating restrictions by order
8 November 2011 FATA informed of the following
of FATA on 2 November 2011:
enforcement measures taken on air carriers under their
regulatory control:
— AVIASTAR-TU, UTAIR-CARGO, TATARSTAN
(a) The following 12 air carriers operating commercial
AIRLINES, DAGHESTAN, YAKUTIA and VIM
air transport into the Union had had their AOCs
AVIA (VIM AIRLINES).
revoked:
(40) As
regards
the
performance
of
certain
operators
-
Yakutia
— 2nd Aviation Unit Sverdlovsk (ICAO designator
and Tatarstan Airlines- whose operations have been
UKU) revocation on 2.03.2011, MOSKVA (ICAO
continuously monitored since 2007 and which had
designator MOA) revocation on 23.03.2011,
been heard by the Commission and members of the
AVIAL NB (ICAO designator NVI), revocation
Air Safety Committee in April 2008, the Commission

---

L 303/20
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
drew the attention of FATA to the results of the analysis
identifying, evaluating, managing and controlling risks in
by EASA of the SAFA ramp checks which indicates that
an appropriate manner to ensure that it operates safely.
certain airworthiness and operations related weaknesses
VIM AVIA (VIM AIRLINES) stated that it had stopped
have not been effectively addressed by previous corrective
operations into the Union following the decision of
and remedial actions. FATA informed that it had
FATA of November 2, 2011.
requested the competent regional authorities responsible
for the oversight of these air carriers to investigate the
results of the SAFA inspections and to ensure that appro
priate corrective measures were implemented by these air
carriers to resolve any detected deficiencies.
(44) On
the
basis
of
information
presented
by
Eurocontrol,
the Air Safety Committee learned that all three air
carriers – VIM AVIA (VIM AIRLINES), YAKUTIA and
TATARSTAN AIRLINES have actually operated various
(41) Both
air
carriers
were
heard
by
the
Air
Safety
Committee
flights into the EU still after November 2, 2011. The
on 8 November 2011 whereby they made presentations
Air Safety Committee was also informed that one air
showing that they had resolved the findings raised
carrier – AERO RENT, whose AOC was revoked by
previously during SAFA ramp inspections. Both air
FATA performed commercial flights departing from the
carriers stated that they had stopped operations into
EU after the date of the decision of revocation.
the Union following the decision of FATA of
November 2, 2011.
(42) As
regards
the
air
carrier
VIM
AVIA
(VIM
AIRLINES),
the
(45) In
the
light
of
this
information
the
Commission
was
Commission drew the attention of FATA to two issues
compelled to request urgent clarifications from FATA
which raised concerns about the effective compliance of
with a view to receiving assurances that the various
the air carrier with relevant safety standards, namely the
enforcement measures (revocation of AOCs and
correspondence by the competent authorities of France
imposition of operating restrictions) vis-à-vis Russian
addressed to FATA following an inspection at a French
air carriers were effectively complied with.
airport ( 1 ) which resulted into numerous significant and
serious findings affecting the safety of operations and
leading to the grounding of the aircraft and the
restriction imposed by these authorities for the return
flight (ferry flight) and the revocation on 24 May 2011
(46) Having
examined
the
documentation
submitted
by
this
of the maintenance approval issued to that air carrier by
air carrier and having listened to its presentations in the
EASA (EASA 145.0410) following its suspension on
Air Safety Committee, the Commission and the Air
24 September 2010 in view of the failure of VIM
Safety Committee have expressed doubts about the capa
AVIA (VIM AIRLINES) to resolve adequately the
bility of VIM AVIA (VIM AIRLINES) to resume operations
findings in accordance with the relevant legislation ( 2 ).
into the European Union unless and until they have
The unresolved findings which led to the revocation of
received the necessary documented evidence that it has
the maintenance approval confirmed deficiencies in the
fully implemented corrective and remedial actions to
area of airworthiness raised during various SAFA
address any findings resulting from both SAFA and
inspections at Union airports ( 3 ) notably those affecting
continuous surveillance activities of FATA in a
undetected defects or damages and known defects or
sustainable manner.
damages left without assessment or monitoring and
damages or defected outside acceptable maintenance
limits.
(47) The
Commission
requested
information
from
FATA
on
10 November 2011 with a view to receiving assurances
(43) During
its
presentation
in
the
Air
Safety
Committee
VIM
by 14 November 2011 that the operations into the
AVIA (VIM AIRLINES) did not show that the air carrier
Union of the air carriers concerned were effectively
has in place a functioning safety management system
restricted until they had demonstrated that they had
which ensures that the operator is capable of correctly
appropriately resolved all findings resulting from both
SAFA and continuous surveillance activities of FATA in
( 1 ) DGAC/F-2011-2145
a sustainable manner. FATA submitted documented
( 2 ) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003, OJ L 315, 28.11.2003,
evidence on 14 November confirming that the
p. 1
operations of the air carrier VIM AVIA (VIM AIRLNES)
( 3 ) SDAT-2011-0058; ENAC-IT-2011-0027; ENAC-IT-2011-0180;
will remain restricted until April 1, 2012 and that the
SCCA-2010-0002; GDCA-2010-0028; AESA-E-2010-0922;
CAAHUN-2011-0023; ENAC-IT-2011-0510; AESA-E-2010-0690;
operations of the other five Russian air carriers were
ENAC-IT-2010-0649; LBA/D-2011-0594; CAA-NL-2011-0143;
restricted until such time as they had demonstrated to
DGAC/F-2011-2145; ENAC-IT-2010-0796; CAA-NL-2011-0141;
FATA that they had addressed effectively all safety issues
SCCA-2011-0009; CAA-N-2011-0013; ENAC-IT-2011-0020;
arising from SAFA ramp inspections. Also, FATA
ENAC-IT-2011-0103; GDCA-2011-0029; SAFA-BUL-2011-0064;
confirmed that it was taking the necessary steps to
SAFA-DGAC/F-2011-0445; SAFA-BUL-2011-0015; HCAAGR-
ensure that all air carriers affected by operating
2011-0039; ENAC-IT-2011-0092; LBA/D-2010-1312; BUL-2010-
0105; SCCA-2010-0008; CAA-SR-2011-0044; HCAAGR-2010-
restrictions complied effectively with the decisions of
0397; DGAC/F-2010-2689; HCAAGR-2010-0414
FATA.

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/21
(48) In
view
of
the
documentation
submitted
by
FATA,
it
is
abovementioned issues. During this meeting CARC
assessed that, at this stage, in accordance with the
outlined a series of measures that were initiated by this
common criteria, no further measures are necessary on
authority in September 2011 to strengthen its oversight
VIM AVIA (VIM AIRLINES). The Commission will
over the air carriers certified in Jordan and ensure that
examine again the performance of this air carrier in the
the results of ramp inspections carried out in the
Air Safety Committee in March 2012.
framework of the European programme for the Safety
Assessment of Foreign Aircraft (SAFA) are duly taken
into account in the oversight of the Jordanian air
carriers, so that safety deficiencies identified during
(49) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
expressed
the
desire
to
inspections are resolved in a sustainable manner.
continue a constructive dialogue with FATA on all
However, this meeting did not allow for sufficient clari
matters affecting safety. The Commission and the Air
fication to be presented with regard to the safety
Safety Committee will monitor closely the performance
performance of the air carrier Jordan Aviation.
of the air carriers whose operations into the Union have
been restricted by FATA to ensure that they resume
operations once they have demonstrated that they
effectively resolved all findings resulting from ramp
(53) In the case of Jordan Aviation the SAFA reports point to
inspections carried out in the EU. The Commission and
significant deficiencies in the management of
the Air Safety Committee will pursue the sustainable
airworthiness and operations of the aircraft of type
resolution of any safety non compliances detected
Boeing B-767. In particular, following a SAFA inspection
during SAFA ramp inspections through further
of B767, Reg No JY-JAG in France
( 1 ), serious
technical consultations with FATA. In the meantime,
airworthiness deficiencies required the aircraft to be
Member States will continue to verify the effective
ferried empty for remedial maintenance actions. The
compliance of Russian air carriers with the relevant
number of findings at each SAFA inspection, as well as
safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp
the repetition of the safety deficiencies since 2010,
inspections to be carried out on aircraft of these
indicate a serious safety concern. As a consequence,
carriers pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 351/2008 and
CARC and the operator Jordan Aviation were invited
the Commission will closely monitor the actions taken
to make presentations to the Air Safety Committee in
by them.
November 2011.
Jordan Aviation
(54) During
their
hearing
by
the
Air
Safety
Committee
on
9 November 2011, CARC and Jordan Aviation
(50) On the basis of an analysis of the results of SAFA
recognized the benefits of the consultations engaged
inspections carried out on certain air carriers certified
with the Commission assisted by EASA and the
in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan since 2010, the
Members States. These consultations triggered the estab
Commission entered into consultations with the
lishment by both organisations of a corrective action
competent authorities for civil aviation of the
plan aiming at addressing the safety deficiencies raised
Hashemite Kingdom (CARC) of Jordan on 1 September
during the SAFA inspections, as well as the weaknesses
2011 with a view to receiving assurances that the safety
identified in their own internal processes. The Committee
deficiencies raised during these SAFA inspections had
acknowledged the efforts made towards bringing
been resolved in a sustainable manner and, where this
sustainable solutions to the safety deficiencies and took
had not yet happened, that appropriate measures had
note of the commitment made by CARC and Jordan
been taken to mitigate the identified safety risks.
Aviation to fully implement their plan as presented
during the hearing.
(51) In
their
reply
of
19
September
2011,
CARC
did
not
provide clear evidence of corrective and preventive
(55) The Committee, whilst welcoming the encouraging
measures effectively implemented by the air carriers
moves by the air carrier, expressed its concerns
concerned. Moreover, the lack of information regarding
regarding the current capability of Jordan Aviation to
the root-cause analysis of the safety deficiencies coupled
mitigate the safety risks regarding the commercial
with increasingly poor results of SAFA inspections
operations with its aircraft of type Boeing B-767.
observed on several air operators certified in the
Taking into account the numerous and repeated safety
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan raised some questions
deficiencies detected during ramp checks of aircraft of
on the ability of the competent authorities of that
type Boeing B-767 operated by Jordan Aviation and
country to conduct appropriately continuous oversight
the insufficient ability of the company to implement,
of the air carriers it certified.
to date, an appropriate corrective and preventive
actions plan, and the lack of exercise of adequate safety
oversight exercised by CARC, it is assessed, on the basis
of the common criteria, that Jordan Aviation should be
(52) The Commission addressed further requests for
placed on Annex B and its operations should be subject
information on 6 October 2011 and invited CARC to
a meeting in Brussels on 21 October 2011 to clarify the
( 1 ) DGAC/F-2011-269

---

L 303/22
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
to restrictions to exclude all aircraft of type Boeing B-
operate the aforementioned aircraft. However, Rollins Air
767. The air carrier should be permitted to fly into the
operates more aircraft of this type and no further
Union with the other types of aircraft on its AOC as per
information was presented in relation to the issues
Annex B.
raised above.
(56) Member
States
encourage
the
Commission
to
pursue
its
consultation with the competent authorities of the
(61) The
Committee
took
into
consideration
that
Honduras
is
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan with a view to ensuring
classified under category 2 of the US IASA programme
that international safety standards are effectively enforced
by the US Federal Aviation Administration indicating
by these authorities and that any corrective and
systemic deficiencies within the competent authorities
preventive actions implemented by all air carriers
of Honduras to discharge effectively its certification and
concerned are sustainable in the long term. In the
oversight obligations on the air carriers under its regu
meantime, Member States shall continue to verify the
latory control.
effective compliance with relevant safety standards
through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be
carried out on aircraft of this carrier pursuant to Regu
lation (EC) No 351/2008.
(62) Consequently,
on
the
basis
of
the
common
criteria,
it
is
assessed that Rollins Air should be included in Annex A
pending submission of evidence of rectification of the
(57) The
Commission
is
ready
to
support
the
efforts
of
CARC
and Jordan Aviation, through an assessment visit, with
deficiencies raised in the standard report issued by the
the participation of Member States and EASA, to verify
French competent authority.
the safety performance of Jordan Aviation as well as the
progress made by CARC in the field of the oversight of
the air operators certified in the Hashemite Kingdom of
Jordan.
Air carriers from the Republic of Congo
(63) The competent authorities of the Republic of Congo
Rollins Air
(ANAC) informed of the issuance of a new AOC to the
air carrier Equatorial Congo Airlines S.A. on
(58) The
Commission
launched
formal
consultations
with
the
23 September 2011, thus without demonstrating that
company Rollins Air certified by the competent
the certification and oversight of this air carrier
authorities of Honduras following information provided
complies fully with applicable international safety
by the competent authorities of France informing about
standards. Therefore, on the basis of the common
their decision not to issue traffic rights to this air carrier
criteria, it is assessed that Equatorial Congo Airlines
pending resolution of the safety deficiencies identified
S.A. should be equally included in Annex A.
during the technical assessment of the technical ques
tionnaire and additional information submitted by
Rollins Air for the purpose of receiving the landing auth
orisation (issuance of a so-called SAFA standard report).
Air carriers from the Democratic Republic of Congo
(64) There
is
verified
evidence
that
the
competent
authorities
(59) The
company
was
invited
to
clarify
the
following
issues
of the Democratic Republic of Congo (AAC) issued a
and make presentations to the Air Safety Committee on
new AOC to the air carrier Stellar Airways, whilst there
8 November 2011: a) evidence that a flight data analysis
is no evidence that the certification and oversight of this
programme compliant with the ICAO provisions had
air carrier complies fully with applicable international
been implemented; b) evidence that France including its
safety standards. Therefore, on the basis of the
oversees territories was part of the authorized area of
common criteria, it is assessed that Stellar Airways
operations for the aircraft of type L1011-500 registered
should be equally included in Annex A.
under HR-AVN, as authorized by its competent authority;
c) evidence that the pilots involved in the intended flight
had passed the necessary proficiency checks over the last
12 months and d) that the flight crew proposed by the
Air carriers from the Philippines
air carrier were both over ICAO acceptable age limits.
(65) The Commission was informed that the competent
authorities of the Philippines (CAAP) would have issued
(60) Neither
Rollins Air nor the competent authority of
new AOC to air carriers such as Aeromajestic and Inter
Honduras (DGAC) was present in the Air Safety
island Airlines. The CAAP failed to reply to the
Committee. DGAC empowered the diplomatic represen
Commission's request for information sent on
tation of Honduras to the Kingdom of Belgium to inform
26 October 2011 regarding the validity of the certificates
the Air Safety Committee about their official position on
held by this companies and did not demonstrate further
9 November 2011, according to which the DGAC
that their certification and oversight comply with the
initiated a procedure to cancel the registration of
applicable international safety standards. Therefore, on
aircraft HR-AVN from the national registry of
the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
Honduras and that Rollins Air is no longer allowed to
these carriers should be equally included in Annex A.

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/23
General considerations concerning the other carriers
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
included in Annexes A and B
(66) No evidence of the full implementation of appropriate
Article 1
remedial actions by the other air carriers included in the
Community list updated on 19 April 2011 and by the
Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 is amended as follows:
authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of
these air carriers has been communicated to the
1. Annex A is replaced by the text set out in Annex A to this
Commission so far in spite of specific requests
Regulation.
submitted by the latter. Therefore, on the basis of the
common criteria, it is assessed that these air carriers
should continue to be subject to an operating ban
2. Annex B is replaced by the text set out in Annex B to this
(Annex A) or operating restrictions (Annex B), as the
Regulation.
case may be.
Article 2
(67) The
measures
provided
for
in
this
Regulation
are
in
accordance with the opinion of the Air Safety
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that
Committee,
of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in
accordance with the Treaties.
Done at Brussels, 21 November 2011.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Joaquín ALMUNIA
Vice-President

---

L 303/24
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
ANNEX A
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
BLUE WING AIRLINES SRBWA-01/2002 BWI Suriname
MERIDIAN AIRWAYS LTD AOC
023 MAG Republic
of
Ghana
ROLLINS AIR HR-005 RAV Honduras
SILVERBACK CARGO FREIGHTERS Unknown VRB Republic
of
Rwanda
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Afghanistan,
including
ARIANA AFGHAN AIRLINES AOC
009 AFG Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
KAM AIR AOC
001 KMF Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
PAMIR AIRLINES Unknown PIR Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
SAFI AIRWAYS AOC
181 SFW Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Angola
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Angola,
with the exception of TAAG Angola Airlines put in
Annex B, including
AEROJET AO
008-01/11 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
AIR26 AO
003-01/11-DCD DCD Republic
of
Angola
AIR GICANGO 009 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
AIR JET AO
006-01/11-MBC MBC Republic
of
Angola
AIR NAVE 017 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
ANGOLA AIR SERVICES 006 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
DIEXIM 007 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
FLY540 AO
004-01
FLYA Unknown Republic
of
Angola
GIRA GLOBO 008 GGL Republic
of
Angola
HELIANG 010 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
_____________
( 1 ) Air carriers listed in Annex A could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not
subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/25
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
HELIMALONGO AO
005-01/11 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
MAVEWA 016 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
SONAIR AO
002-01/10-SOR SOR Republic
of
Angola
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Benin
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Benin,
including
AERO BENIN PEA
No
AEB Republic
of
Benin
014/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS
AFRICA AIRWAYS Unknown AFF Republic
of
Benin
ALAFIA JET PEA
No
014/ANAC/
N/A Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTTATP-
PR/DEA/SCS
BENIN GOLF AIR PEA
No
012/MDCTTP-
BGL Republic
of
Benin
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
BENIN LITTORAL AIRWAYS PEA
No
LTL Republic
of
Benin
013/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
COTAIR PEA
No
COB Republic
of
Benin
015/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
ROYAL AIR PEA
No
11/ANAC/
BNR Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTP-PR/DEA/SCS
TRANS AIR BENIN PEA
No
TNB Republic
of
Benin
016/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Congo
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Republic of Congo, including
AERO SERVICE RAC06-002 RSR Republic
of
Congo
EQUAFLIGHT SERVICES RAC
06-003 EKA Republic
of
Congo
SOCIETE NOUVELLE AIR CONGO RAC
06-004 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
TRANS AIR CONGO RAC
06-001 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
EQUATORIAL CONGO AIRLINES S.A. RAC
06-014 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Democratic Republic of Congo
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Democratic
(RDC)
Republic of Congo (RDC), including

---

L 303/26
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
AFRICAN AIR SERVICES COMMUTER 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
051/09
AIR KASAI 409/CAB/MIN/
TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
036/08
AIR KATANGA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
031/08
AIR TROPIQUES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
029/08
BLUE AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
BUL Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
028/08
BRAVO AIR CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
BRV Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
0090/2006
BUSINESS AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
ABB Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
048/09
BUSY BEE CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
052/09
CETRACA AVIATION SERVICE 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
CER Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
026/08
CHC STELLAVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
0050/2006
CONGO EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
083/2009
COMPAGNIE AFRICAINE D’AVIATION (CAA) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
035/08
DOREN AIR CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
0032/08
ENTREPRISE WORLD AIRWAYS (EWA) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
EWS Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
003/08
FILAIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
037/08
GALAXY KAVATSI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
027/08
GILEMBE AIR SOUTENANCE (GISAIR) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
053/09
GOMA EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
0051/2006
GOMAIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
045/09

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/27
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
HEWA BORA AIRWAYS (HBA) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
ALX Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
038/08
INTERNATIONAL TRANS AIR BUSINESS (ITAB) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
033/08
KIN AVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
042/09
KORONGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
001/2011
LIGNES ARIENNES CONGOLAISES (LAC) Ministerial
signature
LCG Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
(ordonnance No.
78/205)
MALU AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
TVC/04008
MANGO AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
034/08
SAFE AIR COMPANY 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
025/08
SERVICES AIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
030/08
STELLAR AIRWAYS AAC/DG/DTA/TM/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
787/2011
SWALA AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
050/09
TMK AIR COMMUTER 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
044/09
TRACEP CONGO AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
046/09
TRANS AIR CARGO SERVICES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
024/08
WIMBI DIRA AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
WDA Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
039/08
ZAABU INTERNATIONAL 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo
(RDC)
049/09
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Djibouti
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Djibouti,
including
DAALLO AIRLINES Unknown DAO Djibouti

---

L 303/28
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Equatorial Guinea
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Equatorial
Guinea, including
CRONOS AIRLINES Unknown Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
CEIBA INTERCONTINENTAL Unknown CEL Equatorial
Guinea
EGAMS Unknown EGM Equatorial
Guinea
EUROGUINEANA DE AVIACION Y TRANSPORTES 2006/001/MTTCT/ EUG Equatorial
Guinea
DGAC/SOPS
GENERAL WORK AVIACION 002/ANAC n/a Equatorial
Guinea
GETRA - GUINEA ECUATORIAL DE TRANSPORTES 739 GET Equatorial
Guinea
AEREOS
GUINEA AIRWAYS 738 n/a Equatorial
Guinea
STAR EQUATORIAL AIRLINES Unknown Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
UTAGE – UNION DE TRANSPORTE AEREO DE GUINEA 737 UTG Equatorial
Guinea
ECUATORIAL
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Indonesia
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Indonesia,
with the exception of Garuda Indonesia, Airfast
Indonesia, Mandala Airlines, Ekspres Transportasi
Antarbenua, Indonesia Air Asia and Metro Batavia,
including
AIR PACIFIC UTAMA 135-020 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ALFA TRANS DIRGANTATA 135-012 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ASCO NUSA AIR 135-022 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ASI PUDJIASTUTI 135-028 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
AVIASTAR MANDIRI 135-029 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
DABI AIR NUSANTARA 135-030 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
DERAYA AIR TAXI 135-013 DRY Republic
of
Indonesia
DERAZONA AIR SERVICE 135-010 DRZ Republic
of
Indonesia
DIRGANTARA AIR SERVICE 135-014 DIR Republic
of
Indonesia
EASTINDO 135-038 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
GATARI AIR SERVICE 135-018 GHS Republic
of
Indonesia
INDONESIA AIR TRANSPORT 135-034 IDA Republic
of
Indonesia

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/29
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
INTAN ANGKASA AIR SERVICE 135-019 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
JOHNLIN AIR TRANSPORT 135-043 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
KAL STAR 121-037 KLS Republic
of
Indonesia
KARTIKA AIRLINES 121-003 KAE Republic
of
Indonesia
KURA-KURA AVIATION 135-016 KUR Republic
of
Indonesia
LION MENTARI AIRLINES 121-010 LNI Republic
of
Indonesia
MANUNGGAL AIR SERVICE 121-020 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
MEGANTARA 121-025 MKE Republic
of
Indonesia
MERPATI NUSANTARA AIRLINES 121-002 MNA Republic
of
Indonesia
MIMIKA AIR 135-007 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NATIONAL UTILITY HELICOPTER 135-011 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NUSANTARA AIR CHARTER 121-022 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NUSANTARA BUANA AIR 135-041 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NYAMAN AIR 135-042 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PELITA AIR SERVICE 121-008 PAS Republic
of
Indonesia
PENERBANGAN ANGKASA SEMESTA 135-026 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PURA WISATA BARUNA 135-025 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
RIAU AIRLINES 121-016 RIU Republic
of
Indonesia
SAMPOERNA AIR NUSANTARA 135-036 SAE Republic
of
Indonesia
SAYAP GARUDA INDAH 135-004 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SKY AVIATION 135-044 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SMAC 135-015 SMC Republic
of
Indonesia
SRIWIJAYA AIR 121-035 SJY Republic
of
Indonesia
SURVEI UDARA PENAS 135-006 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRANSWISATA PRIMA AVIATION 135-021 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRAVEL EXPRESS AVIATION SERVICE 121-038 XAR Republic
of
Indonesia
TRAVIRA UTAMA 135-009 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia

---

L 303/30
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
TRI MG INTRA ASIA AIRLINES 121-018 TMG Republic
of
Indonesia
TRIGANA AIR SERVICE 121-006 TGN Republic
of
Indonesia
UNINDO 135-040 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
WING ABADI AIRLINES 121-012 WON Republic
of
Indonesia
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Kazakhstan
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Kazakhstan,
with the exception of Air Astana, including
AERO AIR COMPANY AK-0429-10 ILK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AIR ALMATY AK-0409-09 LMY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AIR TRUST AIRCOMPANY AK-0412-10 RTR Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AK SUNKAR AIRCOMPANY AK-0396-09 AKS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ASIA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES AK-0345-08 CID Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ASIA WINGS AK-0390-09 AWA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ATMA AIRLINES AK-0437-10 AMA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AVIA-JAYNAR / AVIA-ZHAYNAR AK-0435-10 SAP Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BEYBARS AIRCOMPANY AK-0383-09 BBS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BERKUT AIR/BEK AIR AK-0428-10 BEK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BURUNDAYAVIA AIRLINES AK-0415-10 BRY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
COMLUX AK-0399-09 KAZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
DETA AIR AK-0417-10 DET Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EAST WING AK-0411-09 EWZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EASTERN EXPRESS AK-0427-10 LIS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EURO-ASIA AIR AK-0384-09 EAK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EURO-ASIA AIR INTERNATIONAL AK-0389-09 KZE Republic
of
Kazakhstan
FLY JET KZ AK-0391-09 FJK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
INVESTAVIA AK-0342-08 TLG Republic
of
Kazakhstan
IRTYSH AIR AK-0439-11 MZA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
JET AIRLINES AK-0419-10 SOZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/31
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
JET ONE AK-0433-10 JKZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIR JET AK-0387-09 KEJ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIRTRANS AIRLINE AK-0349-09 KUY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIRWEST AK-0404-09 KAW Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAVIASPAS AK-0405-09 KZS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
MEGA AIRLINES AK-0424-10 MGK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
MIRAS AK-0402-09 MIF Republic
of
Kazakhstan
PRIME AVIATION AK-0393-09 PKZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SAMAL AIR AK-0407-09 SAV Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SAYAKHAT AIRLINES AK-0426-10 SAH Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SEMEYAVIA AK-400-09 SMK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SCAT AK-0420-10 VSV Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SKYBUS AK-0432-10 BYK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SKYJET AK-0398-09 SEK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
UST-KAMENOGORSK / AIR DIVISION OF EKA AK-0440-11 UCK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ZHETYSU AIRCOMPANY AK-0438-11 JTU Republic
of
Kazakhstan
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Kyrgyz Republic
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the Kyrgyz
Republic, including
AIR MANAS 17 MBB Kyrgyz
Republic
ASIAN AIR 36 AZZ Kyrgyz
Republic
AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY 23 AVJ Kyrgyz
Republic
AEROSTAN (EX BISTAIR-FEZ BISHKEK) 08 BSC Kyrgyz
Republic
CENTRAL ASIAN AVIATION SERVICES (CAAS) 13 CBK Kyrgyz
Republic
CLICK AIRWAYS 11 CGK Kyrgyz
Republic
DAMES 20 DAM Kyrgyz
Republic
EASTOK AVIA 15 EEA Kyrgyz
Republic
ITEK AIR 04 IKA Kyrgyz
Republic

---

L 303/32
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
KYRGYZ TRANS AVIA 31 KTC Kyrgyz
Republic
KYRGYZSTAN 03 LYN Kyrgyz
Republic
KYRGYZSTAN AIRLINE Unknown KGA Kyrgyz
Republic
S GROUP AVIATION
6 SGL Kyrgyz
Republic
SKY WAY AIR 21 SAB Kyrgyz
Republic
TRAST AERO 05 TSJ Kyrgyz
Republic
VALOR AIR 07 VAC Kyrgyz
Republic
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Liberia
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Liberia.
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Gabon
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Republic of Gabon, with the exception of Gabon
Airlines, Afrijet and SN2AG put in Annex B, including
AFRIC AVIATION 010/MTAC/ANAC-
Unknown Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
AIR SERVICES SA 004/MTAC/ANAC-
RVS Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
AIR TOURIST (ALLEGIANCE) 007/MTAC/ANAC-
LGE Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
NATIONALE ET REGIONALE TRANSPORT (NATIONALE) 008/MTAC/ANAC-
NRG Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
SCD AVIATION 005/MTAC/ANAC-
SCY Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
SKY GABON 009/MTAC/ANAC-
SKG Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
SOLENTA AVIATION GABON 006/MTAC/ANAC-
Unknown Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Mauritania
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Republic of Mauritania, including
MAURITANIA AIRWAYS MTW Republic
of
Mauritania
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Mozambique
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the
Republic of Mozambique, including
MOZAMBIQUE AIRLINES – LINHAS AEREAS DE MOZ-01/2010 LAM Republic
of
Mozambique
MOAMBIQUE

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/33
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
MOZAMBIQUE EXPRESS/MEX 02
of
2010 MXE Republic
of
Mozambique
TRANS AIRWAYS/KAYA AIRLINES 03
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
HELICOPTEROS CAPITAL Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CFA MOZAMBIQUE Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
UNIQUE AIR CHARTER Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
AEROVISAO DE MOZAMBIQUE Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
SAFARI AIR Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
ETA AIR CHARTER LDA 04
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
EMILIO AIR CHARTER LDA 05
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CFM-TTA SA 07
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
AERO-SERVICOS SARL 08
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
VR CROPSPRAYERS LDA 06
of
2010 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of the Philippines
responsibility for regulatory oversight of the Phil
ippines, including
AEROMAJESTIC Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AEROWURKS AERIAL SPRAYING SERVICES 2010030 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIR PHILIPPINES CORPORATION 2009006 GAP Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIR WOLF AVIATION INC. 200911 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIRTRACK AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION 2010027 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ASIA AIRCRAFT OVERSEAS PHILIPPINES INC. 4AN9800036 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AVIATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATORS, INC. 4AN2007005 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AVIATOUR'S FLY'N INC. 200910 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AYALA AVIATION CORP. 4AN9900003 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
BEACON Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
BENDICE TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT INC. 4AN2008006 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CANADIAN HELICOPTERS PHILIPPINES INC. 4AN9800025 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CEBU PACIFIC AIR 2009002 CEB Republic
of
the
Philippines

---

L 303/34
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
CHEMTRAD AVIATION CORPORATION 2009018 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CM AERO 4AN2000001 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CORPORATE AIR Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CYCLONE AIRWAYS 4AN9900008 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
FAR EAST AVIATION SERVICES 2009013 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
F.F. CRUZ AND COMPANY, INC. 2009017 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
HUMA CORPORATION 2009014 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
INAEC AVIATION CORP. 4AN2002004 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
INTERISLAND Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ISLAND AVIATION 2009009 SOY Republic
of
the
Philippines
ISLAND TRANSVOYAGER 2010022 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
LION AIR, INCORPORATED 2009019 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
MACRO ASIA AIR TAXI SERVICES 2010029 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
MINDANAO RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL DEVEL 2009016 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
OPMENT SERVICES
MISIBIS AVIATION & DEVELOPMENT CORP 2010020 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
OMNI AVIATION CORP. 2010033 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
PACIFIC EAST ASIA CARGO AIRLINES, INC. 4AS9800006 PEC Republic
of
the
Philippines
PACIFIC AIRWAYS CORPORATION 4AN9700007 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
PACIFIC ALLIANCE CORPORATION 4AN2006001 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 2009001 PAL Republic
of
the
Philippines
PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL AVIATION CORP. 4AN9800015 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ROYAL AIR CHARTER SERVICES INC. 2010024 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ROYAL STAR AVIATION, INC. 2010021 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SOUTH EAST ASIA AIRLINE INC. (SEAIR) 2009004 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SOUTHSTAR AVIATION COMPANY, INC. 4AN9800037 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SPIRIT OF MANILA AIRLINES CORPORATION 2009008 MNP Republic
of
the
Philippines

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/35
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
SUBIC INTERNATIONAL AIR CHARTER 4AN9900010 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SUBIC SEAPLANE, INC. 4AN2000002 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
TOPFLITE AIRWAYS, INC. 4AN9900012 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
TRANSGLOBAL AIRWAYS CORPORATION 2009007 TCU Republic
of
the
Philippines
WORLD AVIATION, CORP. Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
WCC AVIATION COMPANY 2009015 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
YOKOTA AVIATION, INC. Unknown Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ZENITH AIR, INC. 2009012 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ZEST AIRWAYS INCORPORATED 2009003 RIT Republic
of
the
Philippines
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Sao Tome and Principe
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sao Tome
and Principe, including
AFRICA CONNECTION 10/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
BRITISH GULF INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LTD 01/AOC/2007 BGI Sao
Tome
and
Principe
EXECUTIVE JET SERVICES 03/AOC/2006 EJZ Sao
Tome
and
Principe
GLOBAL AVIATION OPERATION 04/AOC/2006 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
GOLIAF AIR 05/AOC/2001 GLE Sao
Tome
and
Principe
ISLAND OIL EXPLORATION 01/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
STP AIRWAYS 03/AOC/2006 STP Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSAFRIK INTERNATIONAL LTD 02/AOC/2002 TFK Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSCARG 01/AOC/2009 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSLIZ AVIATION (TMS) 02/AOC/2007 TMS Sao
Tome
and
Principe
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Sierra Leone
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sierra
Leone, including
AIR RUM, LTD Unknown RUM Sierra
Leone
DESTINY AIR SERVICES, LTD Unknown DTY Sierra
Leone
HEAVYLIFT CARGO Unknown Unknown Sierra
Leone
ORANGE AIR SIERRA LEONE LTD Unknown ORJ Sierra
Leone

---

L 303/36
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC
Air Operator Certificate
ICAO airline designation
(and its trading name, if different)
(AOC) Number or Operating
Licence Number
number
State of the Operator
PARAMOUNT AIRLINES, LTD Unknown PRR Sierra
Leone
SEVEN FOUR EIGHT AIR SERVICES LTD Unknown SVT Sierra
Leone
TEEBAH AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Sierra
Leone
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Republic of Sudan
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sudan,
including
SUDAN AIRWAYS Unknown SUD Republic
of
the
Sudan
SUN AIR COMPANY 051 SNR Republic
of
the
Sudan
MARSLAND COMPANY 040 MSL Republic
of
the
Sudan
ATTICO AIRLINES 023 ETC Republic
of
the
Sudan
FOURTY EIGHT AVIATION 054 WHB Republic
of
the
Sudan
SUDANESE STATES AVIATION COMPANY 010 SNV Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALMAJARA AVIATION Unknown MJA Republic
of
the
Sudan
BADER AIRLINES 035 BDR Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALFA AIRLINES 054 AAJ Republic
of
the
Sudan
AZZA TRANSPORT COMPANY 012 AZZ Republic
of
the
Sudan
GREEN FLAG AVIATION 017 Unkown Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALMAJAL AVIATION SERVICE 015 MGG Republic
of
the
Sudan
NOVA AIRLINES 001 NOV Republic
of
the
Sudan
TARCO AIRLINES 056 Unknown Republic
of
the
Sudan
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Swaziland
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Swaziland,
including
SWAZILAND AIRLINK Unknown SZL Swaziland
All air carriers certified by the authorities with
Zambia
responsibility for regulatory oversight of Zambia,
including
ZAMBEZI AIRLINES Z/AOC/001/2009 ZMA Zambia

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/37
ANNEXE B
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS
WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its
Air Operator Certificate
designation
State of the Operator Aircraft type restricted
when available,
State of registry
AOC (and its trading
(AOC) Number
number
construction serial
name, if different)
number(s)
AIR KORYO GAC-AOC/KOR-01 KOR DPRK All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the DPRK
exception of: 2 exception of:
aircraft of type P-632, P-633
TU- 204
AFRIJET ( 1 ) 002/MTAC/ANAC-
ABS Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon
G/DSA
exception of: 2 exception of: TR-LGV;
aircraft of type TR-LGY; TR-AFJ;
Falcon 50, 2 TR-AFR
aircraft of type
Falcon 900
AIR ASTANA ( 2 ) AK-0388-09 KZR Kazakhstan All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Aruba (Kingdom of
exception of: 2 exception of: P4-KCA, the Netherlands)
aircraft of type P4-KCB, P4-EAS,
B-767, 4 aircraft P4-FAS, P4-GAS,
of type B-757, 10 P4-MAS; P4-NAS,
aircraft of type P4-OAS, P4-PAS,
A319/320/321, 5 P4-SAS, P4-TAS,
aircraft of type P4-UAS, P4-VAS,
Fokker 50
P4-WAS, P4-YAS,
P4-XAS; P4-HAS,
P4-IAS, P4-JAS,
P4-KAS, P4-LAS
AIRLIFT INTER AOC 017 ALE Republic
of
Ghana All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Ghana
NATIONAL (GH)
exception of: 2 exception of: 9G-TOP
LTD
aircraft of type and 9G-RAC
DC8-63F
AIR MADAG 5R-M01/2009 MDG Madagascar All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Republic of
ASCAR
exception of: 2 exception of:
Madagascar
aircraft of type 5R-MFH, 5R-MFI,
Boeing B-737-
5R-MJE, 5R-MJF,
300, 2 aircraft of 5R-MJG, 5R-MVT,
type ATR 72-500, 5R-MGC, 5R-MGD,
1 aircraft of type 5R-MGF
ATR 42-500, 1
aircraft of type
ATR 42-320 and
3 aircraft of type
DHC 6-300
AIR SERVICE
06-819/TA-
KMD Comoros All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the Comoros
COMORES
15/DGACM
exception of: LET exception of:
410 UVP
D6-CAM (851336)
_____________
( 1 ) Air carriers listed in Annex B could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not
subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

---

L 303/38
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
22.11.2011
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its
Air Operator Certificate
designation
State of the Operator Aircraft type restricted
when available,
State of registry
AOC (and its trading
(AOC) Number
number
construction serial
name, if different)
number(s)
GABON
001/MTAC/ANAC GBK Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon
AIRLINES ( 3 )
exception of: 1 exception of: TR-LHP
aircraft of type
Boeing B-767-200
IRAN AIR ( 4 ) FS100 IRA Islamic
Republic
All fleet with the All fleet with the Islamic Republic of
of Iran
exception of: 14 exception of:
Iran
aircraft of type A- EP-IBA
300, 8 aircraft of
type A-310, 1 EP-IBB
aircraft B-737
EP-IBC
EP-IBD
EP-IBG
EP-IBH
EP-IBI
EP-IBJ
EP-IBM
EP-IBN
EP-IBO
EP-IBS
EP-IBT
EP-IBV
EP-IBX
EP-IBZ
EP-ICE
EP-ICF
EP-IBK
EP-IBL
EP-IBP
EP-IBQ
EP-AGA
JORDAN
C002 JAV Hashemite All fleet with the All fleet with the Hashemite
AVIATION
Kingdom of
exception of: 8 exception of:
Kingdom of Jordan
Jordan
aircraft of type JY-JAB
Boeing B-737, 2
aircraft of type JY-JAD
Airbus A-310, 1 JY-JAN
aircraft of type JY-JAO
Airbus A-320
JY-JAX
JY-JAY
JY-JAP
JY-JAQ
JY-JAV
JY-JAH
JY-JAC
NOUVELLE AIR
003/MTAC/ANAC-
NVS Republic
of
Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon;
AFFAIRES GABON G/DSA
exception of: 1 exception of:
Republic of South
(SN2AG)
aircraft of type TR-AAG, ZS-AFG
Africa
Challenger CL-
601, 1 aircraft of
type HS-125-800

---

EN
22.11.2011 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
303/39
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its
Air Operator Certificate
designation
State of the Operator Aircraft type restricted
when available,
State of registry
AOC (and its trading
(AOC) Number
number
construction serial
name, if different)
number(s)
TAAG ANGOLA
001 DTA Republic
of All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Angola
AIRLINES
Angola
exception of: 5 exception of:
aircraft of type D2-TED, D2-TEE,
Boeing B-777 and D2-TEF, D2-TEG,
4 aircraft of type D2-TEH, D2-TBF,
Boeing B-737-700 D2-TBG, D2-TBH,
D2-TBJ
( 1 ) Afrijet is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Union.
( 2 ) Air Astana is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Union.
( 3 ) Gabon Airlines is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Community.
( 4 ) Iran Air is allowed to operate to the European Union using the specific aircraft under the conditions set out in recital (69) Regulation (EU) No 590/2010, OJ L 170,
6.7.2010, p.15.

---