HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"L 348/30
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
18.12.2012
GUIDELINES
GUIDELINE OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
of 26 November 2012
amending Guideline ECB/2011/14 on monetary policy instruments and procedures of the
Eurosystem
(ECB/2012/25)
(2012/791/EU)
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
HAS ADOPTED THIS GUIDELINE:
Article 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Amendment to Annex I
Union, and in particular the first indent of Article 127(2)
thereof,
Annex I to Guideline ECB/2011/14 is amended in accordance
with the Annex to this Guideline.
Article 2
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central
Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular the
Verification
first indent of Article 3.1, and Articles 12.1, 14.3 and 18.2, and
The national central banks of the Member States whose
the first paragraph of Article 20 thereof,
currency is the euro (hereinafter the ‘NCBs’) shall forward
details of the texts and means by which they intend to
comply with this Guideline to the European Central Bank
Whereas:
(ECB) by 19 December 2012 at the latest.
Article 3
(1)
Achieving a single monetary policy entails defining the
Entry into force
instruments and procedures to be used by the Euro
This Guideline shall enter into force two days following its
system in order to implement such a policy in a
adoption.
uniform manner throughout the Member States whose
currency is the euro.
It shall apply from 3 January 2013.
Article 4
(2) A
number
of
updates
are
required
to
address, inter alia,
Addressees
the phasing-in of asset-backed security loan-level data
reporting requirements, specifications regarding coupon
This Guideline is addressed to all Eurosystem central banks.
definitions, performance monitoring data and the calcu
lation of financial penalties for non-compliance with
counterparty obligations.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 26 November 2012.
For the Governing Council of the ECB
(3) Therefore,
Guideline
ECB/2011/14
of
20
September
2011 on monetary policy instruments and procedures
The President of the ECB
of the Eurosystem ( 1 ) should be amended accordingly,
Mario DRAGHI
( 1 ) OJ L 331, 14.12.2011, p. 1.

---

EN
18.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
348/31
ANNEX
Annex I to Guideline ECB/2011/14 is amended as follows:
1. In Section 5.1.3, the following sentence is added:
‘The ECB reserves the right to take any action it deems appropriate in order to correct an error in the tender
announcement, including cancelling or interrupting a tender under execution.’;
2. In Section 5.1.6, the following sentence is added:
‘If the tender result contains erroneous information with respect to any of the above, the ECB reserves the right to
take any action it deems appropriate to correct such erroneous information.’;
3. Section 6.2.1.1 is replaced by the following:
‘6.2.1.1. T y p e o f a s s e t
1. Common eligibility requirements
It must be a debt instrument having:
(a) a fixed, unconditional principal amount (*); and
(b) a coupon that cannot result in a negative cash flow and is one of the following:
(i) fixed, zero and multi-step coupons, i.e. instruments with a predefined coupon schedule and
predefined coupon values;
(ii) flat floating coupons linked to only one index corresponding to a euro money market rate, e.g.
EURIBOR, LIBOR and similar indices, or a constant maturity swap rate, e.g. CMS, EIISDA, EUSA
indices;
(iii) leveraged and de-leveraged floating coupons linked to only one index corresponding to a euro
money market rate, e.g. EURIBOR, LIBOR and similar indices, or a constant maturity swap rate,
e.g. CMS, EIISDA, EUSA indices;
(iv) flat, leveraged and de-leveraged floating coupons linked to the yield of one euro area
government bond that has a maturity of one year or less (either an index or a gross
benchmark yield);
(v) flat inflation-floaters linked to euro area inflation indices, containing no discrete range, range
accrual, ratchet or similar complex structures.
The following coupon structures are notably excluded: all floaters linked to foreign currency interest
rates, commodity and equity indices and exchange rates, dual floaters and floaters linked to swap
spreads or to another combination of indices, and any kind of ratchet and range accrual coupons, as
well as inverse floaters and coupons that depend on a credit rating. Moreover, complex term structures
such as target redemption notes and options to change the coupon type by making use of additional
calling rights are excluded.
Eligible coupons should have no issuer optionalities, i.e. they should not allow changes in the coupon
definition during the life of the instrument that are contingent on an issuer’s decision. In addition, if
caps or floors exist, these shall be fixed and pre-defined. The classification of an instrument as regards its
coupon, in case the coupon is multi-step, will be based on a forward-looking perspective.
Non-compliance with the above-mentioned eligibility criteria also precludes assets from being eligible
even if they only apply to parts of the remuneration structure (such as a premium) and even if a non-
negative coupon payment and a repayment of at least the principal amount is explicitly guaranteed.
The requirements under paragraph 1(a) and (b) apply until the obligation has been redeemed. Debt
instruments may not give rise to rights to the principal and/or the interest that are subordinated to the
rights of holders of other debt instruments of the same issuer.

---

L 348/32
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
18.12.2012
2. Additional eligibility criteria applicable to asset-backed securities
For the purpose of the Eurosystem legal framework related to monetary policy, covered bonds are not
considered asset-backed securities.
Paragraph 1(a) does not apply to asset-backed securities. The Eurosystem assesses the eligibility of asset-
backed securities against the additional criteria laid down in this Section.
The cash flow generating assets backing the asset-backed securities must fulfil the following require
ments:
(a) the acquisition of such assets must be governed by the law of an EU Member State;
(b) they must be acquired from the originator or from an intermediary by the securitisation special
purpose vehicle in a manner which the Eurosystem considers to be a “true sale” that is enforceable
against any third party, and is beyond the reach of the originator and its creditors or the inter
mediary and its creditors, including in the event of the originator’s or the intermediary’s insol
vency (**);
(c) they must be originated and sold to the issuer by an originator incorporated in the EEA and, if
applicable, an intermediary incorporated in the EEA;
(d) they must not consist, in whole or in part, actually or potentially, of tranches of other asset-backed
securities (***). In addition, they must not consist, in whole or in part, actually or potentially, of
credit-linked notes, swaps or other derivatives instruments (****) or synthetic securities;
(e) if they are credit claims, the obligors and the creditors must be incorporated (or, if natural persons,
resident) in the EEA and, if relevant, the related security must be located in the EEA. The law
governing those credit claims must be the law of an EEA country. If they are bonds, the issuers
must be incorporated in the EEA, they must be issued in an EEA country under the law of an EEA
country and any related security must be located in the EEA.
As laid down in Section 6.2.1.7, the issuer of an asset-backed security must be established in the EEA.
In cases where originators or, if applicable, intermediaries, were incorporated in the euro area, or in the
United Kingdom, the Eurosystem has verified that there were no severe clawback provisions in those
jurisdictions. If the originator or, if applicable, the intermediary, is incorporated in another EEA country,
the asset-backed securities can only be considered eligible if the Eurosystem ascertains that its rights
would be protected in an appropriate manner against clawback provisions considered relevant by the
Eurosystem under the law of the relevant EEA country. For this purpose, an independent legal
assessment in a form acceptable to the Eurosystem must be submitted setting out the applicable
clawback rules in the country, before the asset-backed securities can be considered eligible. To
decide whether its rights are adequately protected against clawback rules, the Eurosystem may
require other documents, including a solvency certificate from the transferee, for the suspect period.
Clawback rules which the Eurosystem considers to be severe and therefore not acceptable include rules
under which the sale of cash flow generating assets backing the asset-backed securities can be
invalidated by the liquidator solely on the basis that it was concluded within a certain period
(suspect period) before the declaration of insolvency of the seller (originator/intermediary), or where
such invalidation can only be prevented by the transferee if they can prove that they were not aware of
the insolvency of the seller (originator/intermediary) at the time of the sale.
Within a structured issue, in order to be eligible, a tranche (or sub-tranche) may not be subordinated to
other tranches of the same issue. A tranche (or sub-tranche) is considered to be non-subordinated vis-à-
vis other tranches (or sub-tranches) of the same issue if, in accordance with the priority of payment
applicable after the delivery of an enforcement notice, as set out in the prospectus, no other tranche (or
sub-tranche) is given priority over that tranche or sub-tranche in respect of receiving payment (principal
and interest), and thereby such tranche (or sub-tranche) is last in incurring losses among the different
tranches or sub-tranches of a structured issue. For structured issues where the prospectus provides for
the delivery of an acceleration and an enforcement notice, non-subordination of a tranche (or sub-
tranche) must be ensured under both acceleration and enforcement notice-related priority of payments.
For asset-backed securities to become or to remain eligible for Eurosystem monetary policy operations,
the Eurosystem requires comprehensive and standardised loan-level data on the pool of cash flow
generating assets underlying an asset-backed security to be submitted by the relevant parties in the
asset-backed security, in accordance with Appendix 8.

---

EN
18.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
348/33
To determine the eligibility of asset-backed securities, the Eurosystem takes into account the data
entered in the mandatory fields in the relevant loan-level data reporting template, within the
meaning of Appendix 8. In its eligibility assessment the Eurosystem takes account of: (a) any failure
to deliver data; and (b) how frequently individual loan-level data fields are found to contain no
meaningful data.
In order to be eligible, an asset-backed security must be backed by cash flow generating assets which
the Eurosystem considers to be homogeneous, i.e. that cash flow generating assets backing an asset-
backed security consist of only one type of assets belonging to either residential mortgages, commercial
real estate mortgages, loans to small- and medium-sized enterprises, auto loans, consumer finance loans
or leasing receivables. Asset-backed securities are not eligible for Eurosystem monetary policy oper
ations if the pool of assets underlying them is comprised of heterogeneous assets, because they cannot
be reported using a single template for the specific asset class (*****).
The Eurosystem reserves the right to request from any relevant third party, e.g. the issuer, the originator
or the arranger, any clarification and/or legal confirmation that it considers necessary to assess the
eligibility of asset-backed securities and with regard to the provision of loan-level data. Non-compliance
with such requests may lead to suspension of or refusal to grant eligibility to the asset-backed security
transaction in question.
3. Additional eligibility criteria applicable to covered bonds
Covered bonds shall be subject, from 31 March 2013, to the following additional requirements:
The cover pool of a covered bond shall not contain asset-backed securities, with the exception of asset-
backed securities which:
(a) comply with the requirements laid down in Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC in respect of
asset-backed securities in covered bonds;
(b) were originated by a member of the same consolidated group of which the issuer of the covered
bonds is also a member or by an entity affiliated to the same central body to which the issuer of
the covered bonds is also affiliated;
(c) are used as a technical tool to transfer mortgages or guaranteed real-estate loans from the orig
inating entity into the cover pool.
Covered bonds which were on the list of eligible asset-backed securities from 28 November 2012 and
did not comply with requirements (a) to (c) will remain eligible until 28 November 2014.
___________
(*) Bonds with warrants or other similar rights attached are not eligible.
(**) An asset-backed security shall not be considered eligible if any of the assets, which are part of the cash flow
generating assets backing the asset-backed securities were originated directly by the Special Purpose Vehicle
(SPV) issuing the ABS notes.
(***) This requirement does not exclude asset-backed securities where the issuance structure includes two special-
purpose vehicles and the “true sale” requirement is met in respect of those special-purpose vehicles so that the
debt instruments issued by the second special-purpose vehicle are directly or indirectly backed by the original
pool of assets and all cash flows from the cash flow generating assets are transferred from the first to the
second special-purpose vehicle.
(****) This restriction does not include swaps used in asset-backed securities transactions strictly for hedging
purposes.
(*****) Asset-backed securities that do not comply with the loan-level data reporting requirements because they
consist of mixed pools of heterogeneous underlying assets and/or do not conform to any of the loan level
templates will remain eligible until 31 March 2014.’;
4. In Section 6.2.1.7, footnote 58 is deleted;
5. In Section 6.2.2, footnote 60 is deleted;
6. Section 6.2.2.1 is amended as follows:
(a) paragraph (b) is replaced by the following:
‘(b) The credit claim must have: (i) a fixed, unconditional principal amount; and (ii) an interest rate that cannot
result in a negative cash flow. These features must be maintained until the redemption of the obligation. In
addition, the interest rate should be one of the following: (i) zero coupon-style; (ii) fixed; (iii) floating linked
to another interest rate reference. Furthermore, credit claims with their interest rate linked to the inflation
rate are also eligible.’;

---

L 348/34
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
18.12.2012
(b) paragraph (f) is replaced by the following:
‘(f) Minimum size: At the time of submission for use as collateral (mobilisation) by the counterparty, the credit
claim must meet a minimum size threshold. Each NCB may apply a minimum size of its choice for domestic
credit claims. For cross-border use, a common minimum threshold of EUR 500 000 is applicable.’;
7. In Section 6.2.3, the following paragraph is inserted:
‘Despite their eligibility, national central banks may decide not to accept the following marketable or non-marketable
assets as collateral from a counterparty:
(a) debt instruments falling due in the immediate future; and
(b) debt instruments with an income flow, e.g. a coupon payment, occurring in the immediate future.’;
8. Section 6.2.3.2 is replaced by the following:
‘6.2.3.2. R u l e s f o r t h e u s e o f e l i g i b l e a s s e t s
Marketable assets can be used for all monetary policy operations which are based on underlying assets, i.e.
reverse and outright open market transactions and the marginal lending facility. Non-marketable assets can
be used as underlying assets for reverse open market transactions and the marginal lending facility. They
are not used in Eurosystem outright transactions. All marketable and non-marketable assets can also be
used as underlying assets for intraday credit.
Irrespective of the fact that a marketable or non-marketable asset fulfils all eligibility criteria, a counterparty
may not submit as collateral any asset issued or guaranteed by itself or by any other entity with which it
has close links (*).
“Close links” means any of the following situations where the counterparty is linked to an issuer/debtor/
guarantor of eligible assets:
(a) the counterparty owns directly, or indirectly, through one or more other undertakings, 20 % or more of
the capital of the issuer/debtor/guarantor;
(b) the issuer/debtor/guarantor owns directly, or indirectly through one or more other undertakings, 20 %
or more of the capital of the counterparty;
(c) a third party owns more than 20 % of the capital of the counterparty and more than 20 % of the
capital of the issuer/debtor/guarantor, either directly or indirectly, through one or more undertakings.
For monetary policy implementation purposes, in particular for the monitoring of compliance with the
rules for the use of eligible assets concerning close links, the Eurosystem internally shares information on
capital holdings provided by supervisory authorities for such purposes. The information is subject to the
same secrecy standards as applied by supervisory authorities.
The above provisions concerning close links do not apply to: (a) close links between the counterparty and
an EEA public sector entity which has the right to levy taxes, or in the case where a debt instrument is
guaranteed by an EEA public sector entity which has the right to levy taxes; (b) covered bank bonds issued
in accordance with the criteria set out in Part 1, points 68 to 70 of Annex VI to Directive 2006/48/EC; (c)
cases in which debt instruments are protected by specific legal safeguards comparable to those instruments
given under (b) such as in the case of: (i) non-marketable RMBDs which are not securities; or (ii) covered
bank bonds for which all criteria set out in Part 1, points 68 to 70 of Annex VI to Directive 2006/48/EC
are complied with, except for the limits on guaranteed loans in the cover pool.
Moreover, a counterparty may not submit as collateral any asset-backed security if the counterparty (or any
third party with which it has close links) provides a currency hedge to the asset-backed security by entering
into a currency hedge transaction with the issuer as a hedge counterparty or provides liquidity support for
20 % or more of the outstanding amount of the asset-backed security.
All eligible marketable and non-marketable assets must be usable in a cross-border context throughout the
euro area. This implies that all Eurosystem counterparties must be able to use eligible assets either through
links with their domestic SSSs in the case of marketable assets or through other eligible arrangements to
receive credit from the NCB of the Member State in which the counterparty is established (see Section 6.6).
A counterparty submitting an asset-backed security which has close links to the originator of the
underlying assets of the asset-backed security must inform the Eurosystem of any planned modification
to that asset-backed security that could potentially have an impact on its credit quality, e.g. alteration in

---

EN
18.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
348/35
the interest rate due on the notes, a change in the swap agreement, changes in the composition of
underlying loans not provided for in the prospectus, changes to the priority of payments. The Eurosystem
must be given one month prior notice of any modification to be made to a submitted asset-backed security.
Moreover, at the time of the asset-backed security’s submission, the counterparty should provide
information on any modification that took place in the preceding six months. In line with Section 6.2,
the Eurosystem does not give pre-modification advice.
Table 4
Eligible assets for Eurosystem monetary policy operations
Eligibility criteria Marketable
assets
( 1 ) Non-marketable
assets
( 2 )
Type of asset ECB
debt
certificates
Credit claims RMBDs
Other marketable debt
instruments ( 3 )
Credit
The asset must meet high The debtor/guarantor must The asset must meet
standards
credit standards. The high meet high credit standards. high credit standards.
credit standards are assessed The creditworthiness is The high credit
using ECAF rules for assessed using ECAF rules standards are assessed
marketable assets ( 3 ).
for credit claims.
using ECAF rules for
RMBDs.
Place of issue EEA
( 3 ) Not
applicable Not
applicable
Settlement/
Place of settlement: euro Eurosystem procedures Eurosystem
procedures
handling
area
procedures
Instruments must be
centrally deposited in book-
entry form with NCBs or a
SSS fulfilling the ECB’s
minimum standards
Type of issuer/ NCBs
Public sector
Credit institutions
debtor/guar
antors
Public sector
Non-financial corporations
Private sector
International and suprana
tional institutions
International and suprana
tional institutions
Place of estab Issuer ( 3 ): EEA or non-EEA euro area euro
area
lishment of the G10 countries
issuer, debtor
and guarantor
Debtor: EEA
Guarantor ( 3 ): EEA
Acceptable
Regulated markets
Not applicable Not
applicable
markets
Non-regulated markets
accepted by the ECB
Currency euro euro euro
Minimum size Not
applicable Minimum
size
threshold
at
Not applicable
the time of submission of
the credit claim
— for domestic use: choice
of the NCB,
— for cross-border use:
common threshold of
EUR 500 000.

---

L 348/36
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
18.12.2012
Eligibility criteria Marketable
assets
( 1 ) Non-marketable
assets
( 2 )
Governing laws For
asset-backed
securities
Governing law for credit Not applicable
the acquisition of the claim agreement and mobili
underlying assets must be sation: law of a Member
governed by the law of an State
EU Member State. The law
governing underlying credit The total number of
claims must be the law of different laws applicable to
an EEA country
(a) the counterparty;
(b) the creditor;
(c) the debtor;
(d) the guarantor (if
relevant);
(e) the credit claim
agreement; and
(f) the mobilisation
agreement
shall not exceed two
Cross-border use Yes Yes Yes
( 1 ) Further details are set out in Section 6.2.1.
( 2 ) Further details are set out in Section 6.2.2.
( 3 ) The credit standard of non-rated marketable debt instruments issued or guaranteed by non-financial corporations is
determined on the basis of the credit assessment source chosen by the relevant counterparty in accordance with the
ECAF rules applicable to credit claims, as set out in Section 6.3.3. In the case of these marketable debt instruments, the
following eligibility criteria for marketable assets have been amended: place of establishment of the issuer/guarantor:
euro area; place of issue: euro area.
___________
(*) In the event of a counterparty using assets that, owing to an identity with the issuer/debtor/guarantor or the
existence of close links, it may not or no longer use to secure an outstanding credit, it is obliged to immediately
notify the relevant national central bank thereof. The assets are valued at zero on the next valuation date and a
margin call may be triggered (see also Appendix 6). In addition, the counterparty has to remove the asset on the
earliest possible date.’;
9. In Section 6.3.2, footnote 72 is deleted;
10. In Section 6.3.4.1, the following paragraph is added:
‘An ECAI participating in the ECAF is subject to the Eurosystem performance monitoring process (see Section 6.3.5).
Together with the performance monitoring data submitted, a signed certification from the CEO, or authorised
signatory with responsibility for the audit or compliance function within the ECAI, of the ECAI confirming the
accuracy and validity of the performance monitoring information shall also be submitted.’;
11. In Section 6.3.4.4, the third subparagraph is replaced by the following:
‘An RT provider participating in the ECAF needs to subject itself by agreement to the Eurosystem performance
monitoring process (*) (see Section 6.3.5). The RT provider is obliged to set up and maintain the necessary infra
structure for monitoring the static pool. Construction and evaluation of the static pool have to be in line with the
general requirements on performance monitoring under the ECAF. The RT provider has to undertake to inform the
Eurosystem of the results of the performance evaluation as soon as it has been carried out by the RT provider.
Together with the performance monitoring data submitted, a signed certification from the CEO, or authorised
signatory with responsibility for the audit or compliance function within the RT, confirming the accuracy and
validity of the performance monitoring data must also be submitted. They have to undertake to keep internal
records of static pools and default details for five years.
___________
(*) The counterparty must inform the RT provider promptly about any credit event that may indicate a deterioration
of the credit quality.’;

---

EN
18.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
348/37
12. Section 6.3.5 is replaced by the following:
‘6.3.5. Performance monitoring of credit assessment systems
All credit assessment systems are subject to performance monitoring within the ECAF. For each credit
assessment system, the ECAF performance monitoring process consists of an annual ex-post comparison
of: (a) the observed default rates for all eligible entities and instruments rated by the credit assessment system,
where these entities and instruments are grouped into static pools based on certain characteristics, e.g. credit
rating, asset class, industry sector, credit assessment model; and (b) the appropriate credit quality threshold of
the Eurosystem given by the benchmark PD (two benchmark PDs are considered: a 0,10 % PD over a one-
year horizon which is considered equivalent to a credit assessment of credit quality step 2; and a 0,40 % PD
over a one-year horizon which is considered equivalent to a credit assessment of credit quality step 3 of the
Eurosystem harmonised rating scale). The aim of this process is to ensure that the mapping of the ratings
provided by the credit assessment system to the Eurosystem harmonised rating scale remains appropriate and
that the results from credit assessments are comparable across systems and sources.
The first element of the process is the annual compilation by the credit assessment system provider of the list
of entities and instruments with credit assessments that satisfy the Eurosystem credit quality threshold at the
beginning of the monitoring period. This list shall then be submitted by the credit assessment system
provider to the Eurosystem, using the template provided by the Eurosystem, which includes identification,
classification and credit assessment related fields. The second element of the process takes place at the end of
the 12-month monitoring period when the credit assessment system provider updates the performance data
for the entities and instruments on the list. The Eurosystem reserves the right to request any additional
information required to conduct performance monitoring.
The observed default rate of the static pools of a credit assessment system recorded over a one-year horizon
serves as input to the ECAF performance monitoring process, which comprises an annual rule and a multi-
period assessment. In case of a significant deviation between the observed default rate of the static pools and
the credit quality threshold over an annual and/or a multi-annual period, the Eurosystem consults the credit
assessment system provider to analyse the reasons for that deviation. This procedure may result in a
correction of the credit quality threshold applicable to the system in question.
The Eurosystem may decide to suspend or exclude the credit assessment system where no improvement in
performance is observed over a number of years. In addition, in the event of an infringement of the rules
governing the ECAF, the credit assessment system will be excluded from the ECAF. If inaccurate or
incomplete information is provided by a representative of the credit assessment system for the purposes
of performance monitoring, the Eurosystem may abstain from exclusion in case of minor irregularities.’;
13. Section 6.4.2 is amended as follows:
(a) point (f) is deleted;
(b) table 8 is deleted;
14. In Section 6.5.1, paragraphs (a) and (b) are replaced by the following:
‘(a) For each eligible marketable asset, the Eurosystem defines the most representative price to be used for the
calculation of the market value.
(b) The value of a marketable asset is calculated on the basis of the most representative price on the business day
preceding the valuation date. In the absence of a representative price for a particular asset on the business day
preceding the valuation date, the Eurosystem defines a theoretical price.’;
15. In Appendix 6, Section 1 is replaced by the following:
‘1. Financial Penalties
If a counterparty infringes the rules on tender operations (*), bilateral transactions (**), the use of underlying
assets (***), end-of-day procedures or access conditions for the marginal lending facility (****), the Eurosystem
shall apply financial penalties as follows:
(a) For infringements of rules related to tender operations, bilateral transactions and the use of underlying assets,
for the first and for the second infringements that occur within a 12-month period a financial penalty shall
be applied to each infringement. The financial penalties are calculated using the marginal lending rate that
applied when the infringement began plus 2,5 percentage points.

---

L 348/38
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
18.12.2012
(i) For infringements of rules related to tender operations and bilateral transactions, the financial penalties
are calculated on the basis of the amount of collateral or cash that the counterparty could not settle,
multiplied by the coefficient X/360, where X is the number of calendar days, with a maximum of seven,
during which the counterparty was unable to collateralise or supply the allotted amount during the
maturity of an operation. A flat penalty of EUR 500 applies where the calculation results in an amount
of less than EUR 500; and
(ii) For infringements of rules related to the use of underlying assets (*****), the financial penalties are
calculated on the basis of the amount of ineligible assets, or assets that may not be used by the
counterparty, which are either: provided by the counterparty to an NCB or the ECB; or not removed
by the counterparty by or before the start of the eighth calendar day following an event after which the
eligible assets become ineligible or may no longer be used by the counterparty, multiplied by the
coefficient X/360. Where X is the number of calendar days, with a maximum of seven, during which
the counterparty was in breach of the rules relating to the use of underlying assets. A flat penalty of EUR
500 applies where the calculation results in an amount less than EUR 500.
(b) The first time the rules for end-of-day procedures or for access to the marginal lending facility are infringed,
the applicable financial penalties are calculated using the marginal lending rate that applied when the
infringement began plus 5 percentage points. For repeated infringements, the penalty interest rate
increases by a further 2,5 percentage points each time this occurs within a 12-month period, calculated
on the basis of the amount of the unauthorised access to the marginal lending facility. A flat penalty of EUR
500 applies where the calculation results in an amount less than EUR 500.
___________
(*) This applies if a counterparty fails to transfer a sufficient amount of underlying assets or cash (when
applicable, as regards margin calls) to settle on the settlement day, or to collateralise, until the maturity of
the operation by means of corresponding margin calls, the amount of liquidity it has been allotted in a
liquidity-providing operation, or if it fails to transfer a sufficient amount of cash to settle the amount it has
been allotted in a liquidity-absorbing operation.
(**) This applies if a counterparty fails to transfer a sufficient amount of eligible underlying assets or if it fails to
transfer a sufficient amount of cash to settle the amount agreed in bilateral transactions, or if it fails to
collateralise an outstanding bilateral transaction at any time until its maturity by means of corresponding
margin calls.
(***) This applies if a counterparty is using assets that are or have become ineligible or that may not be used by the
counterparty, e.g., owing to close links between, or the identity of, the issuer/guarantor and the counterparty.
(****) This applies if a counterparty has a negative balance on the settlement account at the end of the day and does
not fulfil the access conditions for the marginal lending facility.
(*****) The following provisions also apply where: (a) the counterparty has been using ineligible assets or has
provided information affecting the collateral value negatively, e.g. on the outstanding amount of a used
credit claim that is or has been false or out of date; or (b) the counterparty is using assets which are ineligible
owing to close links between the issuer/guarantor and the counterparty.’;
16. Appendix 7 is replaced by the following:
‘Appendix 7
CREATION OF A VALID SECURITY OVER CREDIT CLAIMS
To ensure that a valid security interest is created over credit claims and that the credit claims can be swiftly realised
in the event of a counterparty default, the following additional legal requirements need to be met:
(a) Verification of the existence of credit claims: As a minimum, NCBs shall use the following measures to verify the
existence of credit claims submitted to the Eurosystem as collateral: (i) self-certification and undertaking by the
counterparty to the NCB, at least every quarter, to confirm the existence of the credit claims submitted as
collateral, which could be replaced with cross-checks of information held in central credit registers, where
these exist; (ii) one-off verification by NCBs, supervisors or external auditors of the procedures used by the
counterparty to submit the information on the existence of credit claims to the Eurosystem; (iii) random checks
by the NCBs, relevant credit registers, supervisors or external auditors on the quality and accuracy of the self-
certification.
The quarterly self-certification and undertaking under (i) above include the requirement that Eurosystem counter
parties do the following in writing:
(i) confirm and warrant compliance of credit claims submitted to an NCB with the eligibility criteria applied by
the Eurosystem;

---

EN
18.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
348/39
(ii) confirm and warrant that no credit claim submitted as an underlying asset is being simultaneously used as
collateral to the benefit of any third party and undertake that the counterparty shall not mobilise any credit
claim as collateral to any third party;
(iii) confirm and warrant to communicate to the relevant NCB immediately but no later than within the course
of the next business day any event which materially affects the actual contractual relationship between the
counterparty and the relevant NCB, in particular early, partial or total repayments, downgrades and material
changes in the conditions of the credit claim.
For such checks to take place in accordance with (ii) and (iii), supervisors, NCBs or external auditors must be
authorised to carry out this investigation, if necessary contractually or in accordance with the applicable national
requirements.
(b) Validity of the agreement for the mobilisation of credit claims; The agreement for the mobilisation of the credit claim
as collateral also needs to be valid between the parties (transferor and transferee) under national law. All legal
formalities necessary to ensure the validity of the agreement and to ensure the mobilisation of a credit claim as
collateral must be fulfilled.
(c) Full effect of the mobilisation vis-à-vis third parties: regarding debtor notification about the mobilisation of a credit
claim as collateral, taking into account the specific features of the different jurisdictions involved, the following
are required:
(i) In certain Member States where debtor notification of the mobilisation of a credit claim as collateral is
necessary to be fully effective vis-à-vis third parties, and in particular for the priority of the NCB’s security
interest vis-à-vis other creditors, as specified by the applicable national documentation, ex-ante notification of
the debtor is required in advance or at the time of the credit claim’s actual mobilisation as collateral.
(ii) In other Member States where public registration of the mobilisation of a credit claim as collateral is
necessary to be fully effective vis-à-vis third parties, and in particular for the priority of the NCB’s
security interest vis-à-vis other creditors, as specified by the applicable national documentation, such regis
tration is required in advance or at the time of the credit claim’s actual mobilisation as collateral;
(iii) Finally, in Member States where ex-ante notification of the debtor or public registration of the mobilisation of
a credit claim as collateral is not required in accordance with (i) and (ii), as specified by applicable national
documentation, ex-post notification of the debtor is required. Ex-post notification of the debtor requires that
the debtor be notified by the counterparty or the NCB (as specified by the national documentation) about the
credit claim being mobilised as collateral by the counterparty to the benefit of the NCB immediately
following a credit event. “Credit event” means default or similar events as further defined by the applicable
national documentation.
There is no notification requirement in cases where the credit claims are bearer instruments for which applicable
national law does not require notification. In such cases, the NCB concerned may require that such bearer
instruments are physically transferred to it or to a third party in advance or at the time of actual mobilisation
as collateral.
The above are minimum requirements. NCBs may decide to require ex-ante notification or registration in addition
to the cases above, as specified by applicable national documentation.
All other legal formalities necessary to ensure the mobilisation of a credit claim as collateral must also be fulfilled.
(d) Absence of restrictions related to banking secrecy and confidentiality: The counterparty shall not be under an obligation
to obtain the debtor’s approval for disclosure of information about the credit claim and the debtor that is
required by the Eurosystem for the purpose of ensuring that a valid security is created over credit claims and that
the credit claims can be swiftly realised in the event of a counterparty default. The counterparty and the debtor
shall agree contractually that the debtor unconditionally consents to the disclosure to the Eurosystem of such
details on the credit claim and the debtor. No such provision is necessary if there are no rules restricting the
provision of such information under national law, as specified in the applicable national documentation.
(e) Absence of restrictions on the mobilisation of the credit claim: Counterparties shall ensure that credit claims are fully
transferable and can be mobilised without restriction as collateral for the benefit of the Eurosystem. There should
not be any restrictive provisions on mobilisation in the credit claim agreement or in other contractual
arrangements between the counterparty and the debtor, unless national legislation provides that any such
contractual restrictions are without prejudice to the Eurosystem with respect to the mobilisation of collateral.

---

L 348/40
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
18.12.2012
(f) Absence of restrictions on the realisation of the credit claim: The credit claim agreement or other contractual
arrangements between the counterparty and the debtor should not contain any restrictions regarding the real
isation of the credit claim used as collateral, including any form, time or other requirement with regard to
realisation.’;
17. The following Appendix 8 is added:
‘Appendix 8
LOAN-LEVEL DATA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES
Loan-level data are submitted to and published electronically in the loan-level data repository in compliance with
Eurosystem requirements, inter alia, open access, coverage, non-discrimination, appropriate governance structure,
transparency, and designated as such by the ECB, in accordance with the requirements set out in this Appendix.
For this purpose, the relevant loan-level data reporting template is used for each individual transaction, depending on
the asset class comprising the pool of cash flow generating assets (*).
Loan-level data must be reported at least on a quarterly basis, no later than one month following the due date for
payment of interest on the asset-backed security in question. If loan-level data are not reported or updated within
one month following the relevant interest rate payment date, then the asset-backed security will cease to be eligible.
To ensure compliance with these requirements, the loan-level data repository will conduct automated consistency and
accuracy checks on reports of new and/or updated loan-level data for each transaction.
From the application date of the loan-level data reporting requirements for asset-backed securities, i.e. the relevant
asset class according to the template, detailed loan-by-loan level information regarding the pool of cash flow
generating assets must be provided for an asset-backed security to become or remain eligible. Within three
months the asset-backed security must achieve a compulsory minimum compliance level, assessed by reference to
the availability of information in particular data fields of the loan-level data reporting template. To capture non-
available fields, a set of six “No data” (ND) options are included in each such template and must be used whenever
particular data cannot be submitted in accordance with the template. There is also a seventh ND option which is only
applicable for the CMBS template.
The ND options and their meanings are set out in the following table:
“No data” options Explanation
ND1
Data not collected as not required by the underwriting criteria
ND2
Data collected at application but not loaded in the reporting system at completion
ND3
Data collected at application but loaded in a separate system from the reporting one
ND4 Data
collected
but
will
only
be
available
from
YYYY-MM
ND5 Not
relevant
ND6 Not
applicable
for
the
jurisdiction
ND7
Only for CMBS loans with a value less than EUR 500 000, i.e. the value of the whole
commercial loan balance at origination
The following nine-month transitional period applies to all asset-backed securities (depending on the date the loan-
level data reporting requirements apply for the relevant asset class):
— the first quarter following the date the requirements apply is a testing period. Loan-level data must be reported,
but there are no specific limits regarding the number of mandatory fields containing ND1 to ND7,
— in the second quarter, the number of mandatory fields which contain ND1 may not exceed 30 % of the total
number of mandatory fields and the number of mandatory fields which contain ND2, ND3 or ND4 may not
exceed 40 % of the total number of mandatory fields,

---

EN
18.12.2012 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
348/41
— in the third quarter, the number of mandatory fields which contain ND1 may not exceed 10 % of the total
number of mandatory fields and the number of mandatory fields which contain ND2, ND3 or ND4 may not
exceed 20 % of the total number of mandatory fields,
— at the end of the nine-month transitional period, there must be no mandatory fields in the loan-level data
containing ND1, ND2, ND3 or ND4 values for an individual transaction.
Applying these thresholds, the loan-level data repository will generate and assign a score to each asset-backed security
transaction upon submission and processing of loan-level data. This score will reflect the number of mandatory fields
which contain ND1 and the number of mandatory fields which contain ND2, ND3 or ND4, compared in each case
against the total number of mandatory fields. In this regard, the options ND5, ND6 and ND7 may only be used if the
relevant data fields in the relevant loan-level data reporting template permit. Combining the two threshold references
produces the following range of loan-level data scores:
ND1 fields
Scoring value matrix
0
≤ 10 %
≤ 30 % >
30
%
ND2
0 A1 B1 C1 D1
or
≤ 20 % A2 B2 C2 D2
ND3
or
≤ 40 % A3 B3 C3 D3
ND4
> 40 % A4 B4 C4 D4
According to the transitional period set out above, the score must gradually improve for each quarter, in accordance
with the following overview:
Timeline Scoring
value
(eligibility
treatment)
first quarter (initial submission) (no
minimum
scoring
value
enforced)
second quarter C3
(at
a
minimum)
third quarter B2
(at
a
minimum)
from the fourth quarter onwards A1
For residential-mortgage backed securities (RMBS), the loan-by-loan information requirements will apply from
3 January 2013 and the nine-month transitional period ends on 30 September 2013.
For asset-backed securities where the cash flow generating assets comprise loans to small- and medium-sized enter
prises (SME), the loan-by-loan information requirements will apply from 3 January 2013 and the nine-month
transition period ends on 30 September 2013.
For commercial-mortgage backed securities (CMBS), the loan-by-loan information requirements will apply from
1 March 2013 and the nine-month transition period ends on 30 November 2013.
For asset-backed securities where the cash flow generating assets comprise auto loans, consumer finance loans, or
leasing receivables, the loan-by-loan information requirements will apply from 1 January 2014 and the nine-month
transition period ends on 30 September 2014.
Asset-backed securities issued later than nine months after the date the new loan-level data reporting requirements
apply (**) must comply fully with the reporting requirements from the initial submission of loan-level data, i.e. upon
issuance. Already existing asset-backed security transactions that do not conform to any of the loan-level data
reporting templates will remain eligible until 31 March 2014. The Eurosystem will assess on a case-by-case basis
whether a particular asset-backed security transaction can benefit from this grandfathering provision.
___________
(*) The relevant versions of the loan-level data reporting templates for the specific asset classes are published on the
ECB’s website.
(**) i.e. on 30 September 2013 for RMBS and SME, 30 November 2013 for CMBS and 30 September 2014 for auto
loans, consumer finance loans and leasing receivables.’.

---

Document Outline

• �

---