HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"L 190/54
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 659/2013
of 10 July 2013
amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are
subject to an operating ban within the Community
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
the framework of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 and its
implementing Regulation (EC) No 473/2006, with
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
competent authorities and air carriers of the states of
Union,
Curaao & St Maarten, Republic of Guinea, India, Iran,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mozambique and Nepal. The Air
Safety Committee also received updates from the
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the
Commission about technical consultations with the
European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005
Russian Federation and concerning monitoring of
on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject
Bolivia, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan.
to an operating ban within the Community and on informing
air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and
repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE ( 1 ), and in particular
(6) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
heard
presentations
by
Article 4 thereof ( 2 ),
EASA about the results of the analysis of audit reports
carried out by the International Civil Aviation Organi
sation ('ICAO') in the framework of ICAO’s Universal
Whereas:
Safety Oversight Audit Programme ('USOAP'). Member
States were invited to prioritize ramp inspections on
(1) Commission
Regulation
(EC)
No
474/2006
of
22
March
air carriers licensed by states in respect of which
2006 ( 3 ) established the Community list of air carriers
Significant Safety Concerns ('SSC') have been identified
which are subject to an operating ban within the
by ICAO or in respect of which EASA concluded that
Union referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No
there are significant deficiencies in the safety oversight
2111/2005.
system. In addition to consultations undertaken by the
Commission under Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the
prioritization of ramp inspections will allow the
(2) In
accordance
with
Article
4(3)
of
Regulation
(EC)
No
acquisition of further information regarding the safety
2111/2005, some Member States and the European
performance on the air carriers licensed in those states.
Aviation Safety Agency ('EASA') communicated to the
Commission information that is relevant in the context
of updating the Community list. Relevant information
(7) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
heard
presentations
by
was also communicated by third countries. On the
EASA about the results of the analysis of ramp
basis of that information, the Community list should
inspections carried out under the Safety Assessment of
be updated.
Foreign Aircraft programme ('SAFA') in accordance with
Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October
(3) The
Commission
informed
all
air
carriers
concerned
2012 laying down the technical requirements and admin
either directly or through the authorities responsible for
istrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to
their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and
Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European
considerations which would form the basis for a decision
Parliament and of the Council ( 5 ).
to impose on them an operating ban within the Union
or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed
on an air carrier which is included in the Community list.
(8) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
also
heard
presentations
by EASA about the technical assistance projects carried
out in states affected by measures or monitoring under
(4) The
Commission
gave
to
the
air
carriers
concerned
the
Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. It was informed about
opportunity to consult documents provided by Member
the plans and requests for further technical assistance and
States, to submit written comments and to make an oral
cooperation to improve the administrative and technical
presentation to the Commission and to the Air Safety
capability of civil aviation authorities with a view to
Committee established by Council Regulation (EEC) No
helping resolve non-compliance with applicable inter
3922/1991 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonization
national standards. Member States were invited to also
of the technical requirements and administrative
respond to those requests on a bilateral basis in coor
procedures in the field of civil aviation ( 4 ).
dination with the Commission and EASA. On this
occasion the Commission underlined the usefulness of
providing information to the international aviation
(5) The
Air
Safety
Committee
has
received
updates
from
the
Commission about the on-going joint consultations, in
community, notably through ICAO's SCAN database,
on technical assistance being provided by the Union
and by its Member States to improve aviation safety
( 1 ) OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p. 15.
around the world.
( 2 ) OJ L 143, 30.4.2004 p. 76.
( 3 ) OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 14.
( 4 ) OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4.
( 5 ) OJ L 296, 25.10.2012, p 1.

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/55
European Union air carriers
Air Commuter and Zaabu International, previously listed
in Annex A do not hold an operating licence.
(9) Following
the
analysis
by
EASA
of
information
resulting
Consequently, it is assessed that those air carriers
from SAFA ramp checks carried out on aircraft of certain
should be removed from Annex A.
Union air carriers or from standardisation inspections
carried out by EASA as well as specific inspections and
audits carried out by national aviation authorities, some
Member States have taken certain enforcement measures
(14) The
competent
authorities
of
the
Democratic
Republic
of
and informed the Commission and the Air Safety
Congo also explained that, in accordance with the
Committee about those measures. Greece revoked the
country's legal framework, air transport operations
Air Operator Certificate ('AOC') of Sky Wings on
require both an operating licence and an AOC to
1 December 2012 and Spain revoked the AOC of Mint
conduct this type of operations, and that so far none
Lineas Aereas on 10 April 2013.
of the existing operators complies with both require
ments. The five-phase ICAO certification process has
meanwhile been started in April 2013 for 5 operators
(Korongo, FlyCAA, Air Tropiques, ITAB and Kinavia) and
(10) In
addition,
Sweden
brought
to
the
attention
of
the
is expected to be completed by the end of September
Committee their concerns regarding an air carrier, AS
2013. At the end of this certification process, ANAC will
Avies certified in Estonia, which had two serious
provide a list of all the air operators duly certified and in
incidents in Sweden in 2013, namely a runway
possession of a valid AOC.
excursion in February and a temporary loss of power
on both engines during climb out in May. The
Competent Authorities of Estonia informed the
committee that they have taken a number of actions
(15) The Commission noted the commitment of the
including increased surveillance, requiring the air carrier
competent authorities of the Democratic Republic of
to develop a Corrective Action Plan ('CAP'), and
Congo, in particular of the Minister for Transport, and
reviewing the acceptance of the Safety Manager and
encourages them to continue their efforts towards the
Accountable Manager.
establishment of a civil aviation oversight system in
compliance with international safety standards, while
remaining committed to develop further the active
dialogue re-established recently.
Air carriers from the Democratic Republic of Congo
(11) Air
carriers certified in the Democratic Republic of
Congo have been listed in Annex A since March
Air carriers from the Republic of Guinea
2006 ( 1 ). Following a recent initiative by the competent
authorities of the Democratic Republic of Congo
(16) Formal consultations were initiated with the competent
('ANAC') to re-establish active consultations with the
authorities of the Republic of Guinea in December 2012
Commission and EASA, they provided the necessary
following the safety findings raised by ICAO during its
documentary evidence to allow for a comprehensive
audit conducted in April 2012, which raised a SSC
update of the air carriers listed in Annex A.
regarding the certification of air operators.
(17) As a result of the submission of a CAP, and its
(12) The
competent
authorities
of
the
Democratic
Republic
of
Congo have informed the Commission by letter of
subsequent acceptance and validation by ICAO, ICAO
12 June 2013 that the air carriers Air Baraka, Air
announced on 29 May 2013 that it had removed the
Castilla, Air Malebo, Armi Global Business Airways,
SSC.
Biega Airways, Blue Sky, Ephrata Airlines, Eagles
Services, GTRA, Mavivi Air Trade, Okapi Airlines,
Patron Airways, Pegasus, Sion Airlines and Waltair
(18) A consultation meeting took place in Brussels in January
Aviation have been granted an operating licence. Since
2013 between the Commission, assisted by EASA, and
the competent authorities of the Democratic Republic of
the competent authorities of the Republic of Guinea.
Congo did not provide evidence that the safety oversight
During that meeting, the competent authorities of the
of those air carriers is ensured in compliance with inter
Republic of Guinea comprehensively briefed on the
national safety standards, on the basis of the common
latest developments regarding the status of the imple
criteria, it is assessed that all the air carriers of the
mentation of the CAP filed with ICAO in December
updated list should be included in Annex A.
2012.
(13) The
competent
authorities
of
the
Democratic
Republic
of
(19) According to the competent authorities of the Republic
Congo also informed by letter of 12 June 2013 that the
of Guinea, the air carriers Sahel Aviation Service, Eagle
air carriers Bravo Air Congo, Entreprise World Airways
Air, Probiz Guinée and Konair are in the process of
(EWA), Hewa Bora Airways (HBA), Mango Aviation, TMK
recertification. None of them flies into the Union
airspace. Those authorities also informed that the AOC
( 1 ) Recitals (60) to (64) of Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 of 22 March
of air carriers GR-Avia, Elysian Air, Brise Air, Sky Guinée
2006, OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p.18.
Airlines and Sky Star Air have been suspended.

---

L 190/56
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
(20) The competent authorities of the Republic of Guinea
(27) In addition, the DGCA informed that the AOC of Sebang
agreed to keep the Commission informed about any
Merauke Air Charter had been temporarily suspended on
significant development concerning progress in the
18 September 2012.
implementation of ICAO standards, allowing for a
regular monitoring of the situation.
(28) The
DGCA
informed,
and
provided
evidence
confirming,
that the AOC of Metro Batavia had been revoked on
14 February 2013. Consequently, Metro Batavia should
(21) Should
any
relevant
safety
information
indicate
that
there
be removed from Annex A.
are imminent safety risks as a consequence of lack of

compliance with international safety standards, the
Commission will be forced to take action in accordance
(29) On
25
June
2013
the
DGCA
made
a
presentation
to
the
with Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Air Safety Committee. In addition to briefing the
Committee on the information provided to the
Commission in April 2013, the DGCA confirmed that
Air carriers from Indonesia
any AOC holder wishing to expand its fleet required the
approval of the DGCA and that they had, on occasions,
(22) Consultations with the competent authorities of
refused such permission. However, the DGCA had not
Indonesia ('DGCA') continue with the aim of monitoring
intervened with the expansion plans of Lion Air because
the progress of the DGCA in ensuring that the safety
they considered them to be adequately resourced and
oversight of all air carriers certified in Indonesia is in
controlled. Concerning the accident to a Lion Air
compliance with international safety standards.
Boeing B737-800 on 13 April 2013 the DGCA briefed
that the interim accident report had been published. The
report made three recommendations concerning descent
(23) Following the videoconference held between the
below minima, procedures regarding handing over
Commission, EASA and the DGCA on 18 October
control and the associated training. The DGCA detailed
2012, the DGCA continued to work on improving the
the actions they had taken to address the issues
Indonesian aviation safety oversight system and on
surrounding the accident, including conducting a safety
addressing the findings that were raised by the US
audit of Lion Air and ensuring the air carrier had taken
Federal Aviation Administration ('FAA') during its
corrective actions as a result of the preliminary report.
Technical Assessment visit which took place in
September 2012. Following the official publication of
the FAA report, the DGCA met with the FAA and
(30) Lion
Air
attended
the
hearing
and
answered
questions
agreed on a 'CAP.
from the Commission and the Air Safety Committee.

Lion Air stated that they were able to obtain adequate
resources to manage the continuing expansion of their
fleet, but accepted the minimum licensing requirements
(24) In April 2013, the DGCA provided the Commission with
for both captains and first officers in crewing their
a detailed copy of the CAP indicating the progress made,
aircraft and did not demand additional experience.
and informed that an Inspector Training System had
Concerning the accident the company stated that it was
been established, revisions to Aviation Safety Regulations
implementing the interim accident report recommen
had been made and inspecting staff instructions had been
dations, but was awaiting the final report in order to
approved for Extended Range Twin Operations ('ETOPS')
identify the root causes. Lion Air stated that it carried
and Performance Based Navigation/Required Navigation
out safety promotion and used data obtained from their
Performance ('PBN/RNP') and drafted for All Weather
Flight Operations Quality Assurance ('FOQA')
Operations ('AWOPS').
programme to identify hazards. The company stated
that it had not yet achieved the International Air
Transport Association Operational Safety Audit (IOSA)
(25) The
DGCA
confirmed
that
the
certification
of
Citilink
registration.
Indonesia's aircraft, routes, station facilities, ground
handling, maintenance, manuals and crews were adminis
tratively still under Garuda Indonesia management.
(31) The
Commission
and
the
Air
Safety
Committee
noted
the
sound progress made by the DGCA and the plan to
invite the FAA to conduct an IASA audit in August
2013. The Commission and the Air Safety Committee
(26) The
DGCA
also
provided
updated
information
regarding
continue to encourage the efforts of the DGCA
certain air carriers under their oversight. They informed
towards reaching their aim of establishing an aviation
that two new air carriers had been issued an Air
system fully compliant with ICAO Standards.
Operator Certificate (AOC), namely Martabuana
Abadion on 18 October 2012 and Komala Indonesia
on 8 January 2013, and that Intan Angkasa Air
(32) Concerning
Lion
Air,
the
Commission
and
the
Air
Safety
Services had been re-certified. However, since DGCA
Committee noted with concern the low experience levels
did not provide the evidence that the safety oversight
of pilots being recruited and used by the air carrier and
of those air carriers is ensured in compliance with inter
the responses to questions concerning the safety
national safety standards, on the basis of the common
management of the airline and will therefore continue
criteria, it is assessed that those carriers should be
to closely monitor the safety performance of this air
included in Annex A.
carrier.

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/57
Air carriers from Kazakhstan
(39) The
Commission
continues
to
support
the
ambitious
reform of the civil aviation system undertaken by the
(33) Consultations with the competent authorities of
authorities of Kazakhstan and invites those authorities
Kazakhstan have continued actively with the view to
to be determined in their efforts towards the estab
monitoring the progress of these authorities in ensuring
lishment of a civil aviation oversight system which
that the safety oversight of all air carriers certified in
complies with international safety standards. To that
Kazakhstan is in compliance with international safety
end, it encourages those authorities to continue the
standards.
implementation of the CAP agreed with ICAO, focusing
their priority on the two outstanding SSCs and the recer
tification of all operators under their responsibility. Once
those SSCs are closed to the satisfaction of ICAO and
(34) In
accordance
with
Regulation
(EU)
No
1146/2012,
Air
once actual implementation of ICAO standards is suffi
Astana has repeatedly informed about its safety
ciently documented, the Commission would be ready to
performance and changes to the fleet by letters dated
organise, with the assistance of the EASA and the
23 November 2012, 30 January 2013, 14 March
support of Member States, an on-site safety assessment
2013, 29 March 2013 and 13 May 2013 addressed to
visit in order to confirm the progress achieved and
the Commission. They also provided a copy of their new
prepare a case review by the Air Safety Committee.
air operator certificate and new operations specifications,
issued on 22 April 2013. As a result of fleet devel
opments Fokker 50 aircraft no longer appear in their
operations specifications. Consequently, Annex B to this
Air carriers from Kyrgyzstan
Regulation should be amended accordingly.
(40) The Commission continues consultations with the
competent authorities of Kyrgyzstan with a view to
addressing the safety risks, which have led to operating
restrictions on all Kyrgyz air carriers, including the state
(35) On
12
June
2013,
the
Commission,
assisted
by
EASA,
safety oversight capabilities of Kyrgyzstan in the areas of
held technical consultations with the competent auth
aircraft operations and maintenance. In particular, the
orities of Kazakhstan and a representative of Air
Commission seeks to ensure that progress is being
Astana. During that meeting the competent authorities
made with respect to some of the findings of the 2009
of Kazakhstan reported that they were progressing in
ICAO USOAP audit which have a potential impact on
an ambitious reform of the aviation sector, aimed at
the safety of international aviation.
aligning the Kazakh aviation legislative and regulatory
framework with the international safety standards.
(41) On
23
May
2013,
the
Commission,
assisted
by
EASA,
held technical consultations with the competent auth
(36) At
the
meeting,
Air
Astana
provided
further
information
orities of Kyrgyzstan for the purpose of identifying
about its fleet developments for 2012 – 2014. In
possible air carriers whose certification and oversight
particular, Air Astana informed that several aircraft had
would meet the international safety standards, and in
been phased out and that new aircraft were being phased
respect of which a gradual relaxation of restrictions
in within the existing Boeing B767, B757, and Airbus
could be envisaged. In this regard, the Kyrgyz
A320 series, which are already mentioned in Annex B to
competent authorities agreed to cooperate in providing
this Regulation. All newly acquired aircraft shall be
information that would be useful to achieve some
registered in Aruba. Both the competent authority of
progress. The representatives of Kyrgyzstan also agreed
Kazakhstan and Air Astana committed to inform the
to provide an update on the corrective action taken to
Commission once a new aircraft had been specified in
resolve the outstanding ICAO findings which would
the air operator certificate of Air Astana.
allow a review of the case.
(42) During the meeting, the Kyrgyz authorities confirmed
(37) In addition, Member States and EASA confirmed that
there were no specific concerns related to Air Astana
that on 8 November 2012 an air operator certificate
from ramp checks carried out at Union airports in the
had been granted to Sky Bishkek. Since the competent
framework of the SAFA programme.
authorities of Kyrgyzstan did not provide evidence that

the safety oversight of that air carrier is ensured in
compliance with international safety standards, on the
basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that the air
carrier Sky Bishkek should be included in Annex A.
(38) Member
States
will
verify
the
effective
compliance
with
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of Air
Astana pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
(43) The
Air
Safety
Committee
calls
on
the
competent
auth
Should the results of such checks, or any other
orities of Kyrgyzstan to accelerate the process of imple
relevant safety information, indicate that international
mentation of the CAP agreed with ICAO and to make
safety standards are not being met, the Commission
every effort to ensure that the safety oversight of all air
would be forced to take action in accordance with Regu
carriers certified in Kyrgyzstan is in compliance with
lation (EC) 2111/2005.
international safety standards.

---

L 190/58
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
(44) Once progress with the implementation of the CAP
of the Air Safety Committee, individual air carriers could
agreed with ICAO and actual implementation of ICAO
be permitted to recommence commercial flights to the
standards is sufficiently documented, the Commission
Union.
would be ready to organise, with the assistance of the
EASA and the support of Member States, an on-site
safety assessment visit in order to confirm that the
competent authorities of Kyrgyzstan are able to exercise
(50) Furthermore, the Commission and the Air Safety
their oversight functions in accordance with the inter
Committee reiterated that for each air carrier recertified,
national standards and prepare a case review at the Air
the LYCAA must submit to the Commission detailed
Safety Committee.
information on the recertification process and to meet
with the Commission and Member States to discuss in
detail the relevant audits, findings, remedial actions taken
and closure actions, together with details of the plans for
Air carriers from Libya
continuing oversight before any agreement about the
relaxation of restrictions. Should it not be demonstrated
(45) Consultations
with
the
competent
authorities
of
Libya
to the satisfaction of the Commission and the Member
('LYCAA') continue with the aim of confirming that
States that the recertification process had been effectively
Libya is progressing in its work to reform its civil
completed and sustainable continued oversight is in place
aviation safety system, and in particular ensuring that
in accordance with ICAO standards, the Commission
the safety oversight of all air carriers certified in Libya
would be compelled to take immediate measures to
is in compliance with international safety standards.
prevent air carriers from operating in the Union,
Norway, Switzerland and Iceland.
(46) On
25
April
2013
the
LYCAA
provided
a
report
of
the
re-certification activities conducted on the air carrier
Libyan Airlines. The report described a five phase
Air Madagascar
process in line with ICAO recommendations but did
(51) The
air
carrier
Air
Madagascar
is
subject
to
operational
not provide any detailed evidence of the associated
restrictions and is listed in Annex B pursuant to Regu
inspection activities. The Commission sought further
lation (EU) No 390/2011. On 24 May 2013, the air
details and on 29 April 2013 the LYCAA provided a
carrier Air Madagascar made the request to add the
resumé of the findings raised together with the actions
aircraft of type Boeing B737 with registration mark
taken by Libyan Airlines to close the findings in the
5R-MFL to the list of aircraft of type Boeing B737 that
sampled areas.
are already mentioned under Annex B.
(47) On 4 June 2013 the LYCAA wrote to the Commission
informing them that Libyan Airlines would not now be
(52) Air
Madagascar
stated
and
provided
evidence
that
the
ready for consideration for a lifting of restrictions citing a
safety performance of its fleet has improved. The
change in management of the airline and the consequent
competent authorities of Madagascar ('ACM') stated
need to assess the impact of these changes on the air
that, with regard to the operations conducted with the
carrier’s operational safety.
aircraft of type Boeing B737, they are satisfied with the
current level of compliance demonstrated by Air
Madagascar with respect to ICAO requirements.
Member States and EASA confirmed that no specific
(48) On
26
June
2013
the
Air
Safety
Committee
heard
pres
concern arose from ramp checks carried out at Union
entations from the LYCAA. The LYCAA briefed the
airports in the framework of the SAFA programme.
committee on the actions taken to date and the
progress with the recertification of Libyan air carriers.
They explained that they were not in a position to
recommend any Libyan air carrier to be released from
(53) Taking into account the safety performance of the oper
the current restrictions. They provided timescales
ations conducted by Air Madagascar with the aircraft of
concerning when they believed the air carriers would
type Boeing B737 and in accordance with the common
complete the certification process. They said that the
criteria, the Commission, following the opinion of the
accident report concerning the Afiqiyah Airways Airbus
Air Safety Committee, considers that the aircraft of
A330 accident had been published, and that the LYCAA
type Boeing B737 with registration mark 5R-MFL
was in discussion with ICAO and a number of National
should be permitted to fly into the Union. Consequently,
Aviation Authorities to provide additional technical
Annex B should be amended to allow the operation of
assistance.
the aircraft of type Boeing B737 with registration mark
5R-MFL.
(49) The
LYCAA
confirmed
explicitly
to
the
Commission
and
the Air Safety Committee that they would retain the
(54) Member States will continue to verify the effective
current restrictions on all air carriers until such time as
compliance with relevant safety standards through the
a full five stage recertification has been completed and
prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on
any significant findings closed, only following which, in
aircraft of Air Madagascar pursuant to Regulation (EU)
agreement with the Commission and following a hearing
No 965/2012.

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/59
Air carriers from the Islamic Republic of Mauritania
personnel, customization and updating of manuals,
procedures and check lists, systematic monitoring and
(55) All
air
carriers
certified
in
Mauritania
were
removed
from
documentation of all continuous oversight activities,
Annex A in December 2012 ( 1 ) in the light of a number
improved system of incident reporting and analysis.
of factors: the major progress reported by the competent
MAI should also further implement its Safety
authorities of Mauritania ('ANAC') in the rectification of
Management System ('SMS') and flight data analysis.
the deficiencies identified by ICAO concerning
compliance with international standards, the rectification
of the deficiencies identified in the initial certification of
the air carrier Mauritania Airlines International ('MAI'),
the confirmation that MAI will resume flights to the
Union only to Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain after
(60) ANAC
and
MAI
were
heard
by
the
Air
Safety
Committee
February 2013, and the Commission's commitment to
on 26 June 2013. During the meeting ANAC and MAI
carry out an on-site safety assessment visit to confirm
provided details about progress made in view of
the satisfactory implementation of the measures reported
addressing the recommendations identified during the
by ANAC and MAI.
on-site visit. ANAC reported of updates to their
procedures, check list, training and oversight plan and
training programme. It also provided evidence of the
performance of targeted inspections on MAI, of a wide
awareness campaign concerning incident reporting and
(56) The
Commission
conducted
the
on-site
aviation
safety
informed of increased access to technical information
assessment visit to Mauritania between 14 and
from engine manufacturers. ANAC explained that it
18 April 2013, with the assistance of EASA and the
was exercising a close oversight of MAI, including
technical support of the Member States.
numerous ramp checks, and taking firm enforcement
actions when needed.
(57) During the visit, ANAC provided the assessment team
with evidence of its strong commitment and capacity
to comply with ICAO aviation safety standards and to
(61) MAI
reported
that
it
had
initiated
its
flights
to
Las
Palmas
assume its responsibilities concerning the certification
de Gran Canaria on 8 May 2013 and that it had also
and surveillance of air carriers under its responsibility
drafted an action plan in view of addressing all recom
in a sustainable manner. In particular, the assessment
mendations raised by the assessment team. Most actions
team considered that ANAC showed that progress had
of the plan were closed, including, among others,
been made in the implementation of its CAP aimed at
updating of manuals, new procedures and nomination
complying with ICAO standards, that it has the necessary
of the quality and safety management post holder. MAI
qualified staff, regulations and procedures, that it handles
recognized that the implementation of the SMS was
and implements a comprehensive and appropriate
progressing but not already fully operational.
surveillance plan and that it has in place a system
aimed at addressing identified safety concerns. Those
considerations were drawn taking into consideration
the current limited size and level of activity of the
airline industry in Mauritania and the recent restructuring
of ANAC.
(62) The
first
two
ramp
inspections
carried
out
by
Spain
on
MAI aircraft, on 8 and 22 May 2013 showed a number
of findings, mainly regarding maintenance conditions,
but their number and gravity decreased during a third
ramp inspection performed on 12 June. Spain confirmed
(58) MAI
was
also
visited
by
the
assessment
team,
which
that MAI had provided information for the closing of
found evidence of the airline's ability to comply with
open findings, which were still under assessment by
ICAO aviation safety standards for air operations,
Spain.
especially as regards airworthiness, qualification and
training, manuals and safety procedures and identification
and resolution of safety issues identified during internal
and external control, such as in the monitoring activities
performed by ANAC.
(63) The
Air
Safety
Committee
welcomed
the
improvements
made by ANAC and MAI in the implementation of inter
national safety standards and encouraged them to
continue improving with the same determination.
(59) However,
the
assessment
team
also
found
that
ANAC
ANAC and MAI were requested to provide regular
and MAI needed to continue the effective implemen
reports to the Commission, at least twice a year, about
tation of certain international requirements, particularly
their progress in the implementation of the ICAO
in the areas of specific and recurrent training of technical
requirements and in addressing the recommendations
still open, particularly with regard to the incident
( 1 ) Recitals (71) to (81) of Commission implementing Regulation (EU)
reporting and analysis system in ANAC and the SMS
No 1146/2012, OJ L 333, 5.12.2012, p. 7.
implementation and flight data analysis in MAI. ANAC

---

L 190/60
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
commited to inform the Commisison regarding new
(68) The
representatives
of
LAM
made
a
detailed
presentation
commercial airlines which would be certified by ANAC.
of the company, including an outline of its internal
structure, staffing, and scale of operations, and
described the training activities as well as the various
operational partnerships the company has entered into.
The airline has established strategic partnerships with
(64) Member
States
will
verify
the
effective
compliance
with
other airlines in Portugal, Kenya, South Africa, Angola,
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
Zambia and Ethiopia (Moambique Expresso MEX is a
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of air
100% owned feeder airline subsidiary), training organi
carriers licensed in Mauritania pursuant to Regulation
sations (in South Africa and Ethiopia) and maintenance
(EU) No 965/2012.
organisations (in Portugal, Brazil, South Africa and
Kenya). The internal safety management systems were
described together with the planned deployment of the
next phases. Phase I (Planning and Organisation) has
(65) Should
the
results
of
ramp
checks
or
any
other
relevant
mostly been completed up to 2011 (some on-going
safety information indicate that international safety
activities will be concluded in 2014). Phase II (Reactive
standards are not being met, the Commission would be
Processes) has mostly been implement between 2005
forced to take action in accordance with Regulation (EC)
and 2009, with 2 processes to be completed by 2014.
No 2111/2005.
Most of the actions pertaining to Phase III (Proactive and
Predictive Processes) are on-going, with completion date
set to 2014-2015, while 3 of the processes have been
implemented in 2009. Most of Phase IV (Operational
Safety Assurance & Continuous Improvement) is
Air carriers from Mozambique
planned for deployment in 2014-2015, with one
process completed in 2009.
(66) The
competent
authorities
of
Mozambique
(Institute
of
Civil Aviation of Mozambique – 'IACM') and represen
tatives of the air carrier Linhas Aéreas de Moambique
(LAM) met with the Commission and EASA in Brussels
on 31 May 2013. IACM comprehensively briefed on the
(69) LAM
also
briefed
on
their
expansion
strategy
and
plans,
current status of implementation of the CAP filed with
including new routes and fleet evolution.
ICAO. LAM briefed at length on the current status of
adoption of international safety standards in their
structure and daily operations as well as on their
expansion plans.
(70) The Air Safety Committee welcomed the progress
reported by the competent authorities of Mozambique
in the rectification of the deficiencies identified by
ICAO and encouraged their efforts towards completing
(67) The
competent
authorities
of
Mozambique
presented
in
their work of establishing an aviation system fully
detail the internal structure and staffing of their organi
compliant with ICAO Standards.
sation and described the scale and the substance of their
activities. The various streams of past and on-going activ
ities, together with the respective timelines, were
explored and put in the context of the CAP agreed
with ICAO. Most of those actions have an implemen
Air carriers from Nepal
tation deadline of mid-June 2013. The number and
volume of the actions, as well as the tight deadlines,
(71) The
results
of
an
ICAO
audit
in
May
2009
found
Nepal
demonstrate a firm commitment by the authorities, but
not in effective compliance with the majority of inter
might need rescheduling in order to allow for sustainable
national safety standards. Although no SSCs were ident
implementation. The authorities appeared fully aware of
ified, the audit showed that the competent authority of
this and are in the process of reviewing some of the
Nepal was not capable of ensuring effective implemen
deadlines in the CAP, a revised version of which will
tation of international safety standards in the areas of air
soon be filed with ICAO. The most important areas
operations, airworthiness and accident investigation, and
which will only be addressed in 2014 or 2015 are
that there were significant findings affecting the country's
related to specific aspects in the legal framework,
capability also in the areas of primary aviation legislation
residual organisational matters in the authority's
and civil aviation regulations, civil aviation organisation
internal structure and airworthiness topics. All air
and personnel licensing and training.
operators have gone through a 5-step re-certification
process, at the end of which 8 operators (Linhas
Aéreas de Moambique LAM S.A., Moambique
Expresso SARL MEX, CFM-TTA S.A., Kaya Airlines Lda,
CR Aviation, Coastal Aviation, CFA-Mozambique S.A.,
(72) Five
fatal
accidents,
involving
a
number
of
EU
citizens,
TTA SARL) are now fully certified and 5 (Emilio Air
have occurred in Nepal involving Nepal registered aircraft
Charter Lda, Aero-Servicos SARL, Helicopteros Capital
over a period of two years (August 2010 – September
Lda, UNIQUE Air Charter Lda, ETA Air Charter Lda)
2012). In addition, there were three more accidents in
have seen their AOCs suspended.
2013.

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/61
(73) Consultations
with
the
competent
authorities
of
Nepal
Air carriers from the Philippines
started in October 2012, on the basis of safety-related
deficiencies identified by the ICAO USOAP audit in May
(80) Consultations with the competent authorities of the Phil
2009 and the high number of fatal accidents over a short
ippines ('CAAP') continue with the aim of confirming the
time period. No Nepalese air carrier operates in the
corrective actions taken by CAAP in order to address the
Union.
safety issues highlighted by the audits conducted by both
ICAO and the Federal Aviation Administration of the
United States (FAA) in 2012 and 2013.
(74) As part of the consultations, the Commission received
documentation of the oversight activities planned and
carried out by the competent authorities of Nepal for
(81) CAAP informed that ICAO had carried out an ICVM in
the years 2012 and 2013. The examination of this docu
February 2013, and that on 1 March 2013 ICAO wrote
mentation indicated that there remained some safety defi
to CAAP informing them that the corrective actions
ciencies and that the oversight activities seemed to be
taken by the Philippines had successfully addressed and
insufficient with regard to controlling the identified
resolved the two SSCs identified, firstly, during the ICAO
safety risks.
USOAP audit in October 2009 and, secondly, during the
ICVM conducted in October 2012.
(75) The Commission, assisted by EASA, held technical
consultations with the Nepalese competent authorities
(82) Consequently, on 16 April 2013, the Commission,
('CAAN') in Brussels on 30 May 2013. During those
assisted by EASA and representatives from the Member
consultations the CAAN explained the situation in
States, held a meeting with CAAP and the air carriers
depth and provided information related to the control
Philippine Airlines and Cebu Pacific Airways to discuss
of safety risks. The explanations provided by Nepal
the progress made in addressing the outstanding issues
indicated that the oversight activities were more
identified by ICAO, the FAA and the Union on-site visit
complete than revealed in the preceding documentation
conducted by the Commission in October 2010.
sent by Nepal. The CAAN also provided information on
the follow up of recommendations from accident inves
tigation reports and several safety initiatives. These safety
initiatives included the establishment of safety objectives
(83) During
the
meeting,
CAAP
confirmed
that
they
had
and safety targets. An effective implementation of all the
introduced a five phase certification process together
safety initiatives should lead to improved oversight and
with a revalidation process which was underway for all
better control of safety risks. The information provided
existing air carriers. 7 large and 9 small air carriers had
by the CAAN at the meeting will be verified by further
completed that process including Philippine Airlines
documentation review.
(PAL) and Cebu Pacific Air. CAAP briefed on the estab
lishment of a two system approach to air carrier over
sight, with a Certificate Management Office ('CMO')
(76) The air carrier SITA Air Plc Ltd also participated in the
established with an inspecting staff of 24 persons to
technical consultation, where it provided information on
supervise PAL and Cebu Pacific Air only, the other air
their safety related activities and the interaction with the
carriers being supervised by the Operations and
CAAN. SITA Air suffered a fatal accident in September
Airworthiness Departments.
2012 and explained lessons learned from this accident.
(84) CAAP
also
explained
that
they
were
addressing
the
issue
(77) Several
challenges
remain
for
CAAN
and
the
aviation
of the sustainability of the system by increasing staff
industry of Nepal, including factors such as recruiting
salaries to attract inspecting staff from the industry.
and keeping sufficient and competent staff in CAAN
Training programmes for inspectors had also been imple
and conducting air operations in a very demanding
mented. However, CAAP did not formally inspect either
mountainous environment. CAAN showed that it is
the Quality Management Systems ('QMS') or the SMS of
working on addressing these challenges and the
the air carriers under their supervision.
Commission will therefore continue to monitor the
situation in Nepal.
(85) PAL
briefed
that
they
had
a
fleet
of
44
aircraft
(Boeing
B747, B777, Airbus A340, A330, A320/319) with 68
(78) ICAO
will
be
carrying
out
an
on-site
coordination
and
additional aircraft on order (44 Airbus A321, 20 A330,
validation mission ('ICVM') audit in Nepal in July 2013
and 4 A340). Their SMS had a target to reduce events
and it seems appropriate to wait for the results of that
which have a detrimental effect on safety standards by
ICAO activity before completing the assessment of the
10% from the previous year. The Flight Data Monitoring
safety situation in Nepal.
('FDM') data of 95 to 100% of the flights were examined,
with emphasis on un-stabilised approaches and Ground
Proximity Warning System ('GPWS') events. Their QMS
(79) Should
the
results
of
the
ICAO
audit
or
any
other
had conducted 260 inspections in 2012 with 94 findings
relevant safety information indicate that the safety risks
against company procedures which differed from findings
are not adequately contained, the Commission would be
made by CAAP because more training issues were ident
forced to take action in accordance with Regulation (EC)
ified. Cebu Pacific Air briefed that fleet growth was at 7%
No 2111/2005.
p.a. They were receiving 2 Airbus A330 aircraft in 2013

---

L 190/62
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
to commence long-haul flights in June, and the aim was
visit. In terms of their expansion plans they recognised
to have a fleet of 47 aircraft by the end of 2013. As a
that the provision of a suitable number of pilots would
result of the meeting the Commission, assisted by the
be a challenge but noted that the new aircraft would also
Member States conducted an on-site visit to the Phil
replace older aircraft and consequently the rate of
ippines between 3 to 7 June 2013.
expansion was manageable.
(86) The conclusions of the visit were that the CAAP had yet
(92) Taking
into
account
the
safety
oversight
provided
by
to embrace modern aviation safety management tech
CAAP and the ability of PAL to ensure effective
niques both with the air carriers it supervises and inter
compliance with relevant aviation safety regulations, on
nally. In the operations area there remains insufficient
the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that the
attention to human factors and SMS processes.
air carrier Philippine Airlines should be removed from
Annex A.
(87) However, it was clear from the visit that while
considerable work remained to be done within the
(93) Member
States
will
verify
the
effective
compliance
with
CAAP, the Director General for Civil Aviation is taking
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
clear actions to ensure that the CAAP becomes more
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of PAL
effective in its day to day work. In addition, it was
pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012. Should the
noted that there are plans in place to address the issue
results of such checks, or any other relevant safety
of an ageing inspector cadre by improving remuneration
information, indicate that international safety standards
to facilitate recruitment from the industry, and the use of
are not being met, the Commission would be forced to
external expertise to reduce the risk of gaps in the
take action in accordance with Regulation (EC)
oversight of the air carriers. In summary, the CAAP
2111/2005.
oversight of its air carriers was essentially sound
although some weaknesses remained particularly in the
areas of training, standardisation, quality management
and safety management systems.
(94) However, the Commission and the Air Safety Committee
were encouraged by the actions being taken by CAAP in
addressing the outstanding safety issues and will continue
to closely monitor the situation with a view to
(88) In
the
case
of
the
air
carriers,
both
PAL
and
Cebu
Pacific
conducting further reviews of the case at future Air
Air were able to demonstrate that they had effective
Safety Committees.
safety management process in place and were able to
ensure compliance with the relevant safety regulations.
However, at the time of the visit, Cebu Pacific Air
suffered an accident which raised questions regarding
Air carriers from the Russian Federation
their control of flight operations. As a result Cebu
Pacific Air decided not to attend the hearing of the Air
(95) Aircraft
operated
by
some
air
carriers
certified
in
the
Safety Committee in order to concentrate on addressing
Russian Federation and flying into airports in the
any safety issues that emerge from the safety investi
Union are being subjected to prioritised SAFA ramp
gations currently underway.
inspections to verify their compliance with the inter
national safety standards. The competent authorities of
the Member States and EASA continue to inform their
counterparts in the Russian Federation of the identified
(89) During the visit the CAAP updated the list of current
concerns and invite them to take action to address any
AOCs, showing that 32 air carriers were currently
non-compliance with ICAO standards.
certified by the CAAP. Annex A should be updated
accordingly.
(96) In the meantime, the Commission continues the dialogue
on aviation safety issues with the competent authorities
(90) On
26
June
2013
the
Air
Safety
Committee
heard
pres
of the Russian Federation, in particular to ensure that any
entations from the CAAP and PAL. The CAAP detailed
current risks stemming from poor safety performance of
the actions underway to ensure sustainability, including
air carriers certified in the Russian Federation are
addressing human resource issues, the provision of IT
adequately contained.
equipment, the production of a State Safety programme,
the updating of legislation, and the enhancement of
training particularly on SMS.
(97) On
13
June
2013,
the
Commission,
assisted
by
EASA
and several Member States, held a meeting with the
representatives of the Russian Federal Air Transport
(91) PAL,
in
addition
to
covering
points
made
during
the
Agency ('FATA') where FATA provided an update on
meeting on 16 April 2013, briefed on the actions
the measures undertaken by the authority and the air
taken to address the observations made by the on-site
carriers concerned to address findings identified during

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/63
SAFA ramp inspections. In particular, FATA stated that
of air carriers, maintenance organisations and approved
one air carrier had been placed under a special control,
training organisations. Therefore, following an ICVM
while another carrier had seen its AOC revoked.
audit in May 2012, ICAO had removed the SSC.
(98) At the meeting, FATA advised that during the first half of
(104) Subsequently, the Commission, assisted by EASA, held a
2013 Vim Airlines had been frequently inspected and
meeting with the SCAA on 29 April 2013. The SCAA
concluded that according to the audit results Vim
briefed that it was now an autonomous organisation with
Airlines operated at an acceptable safety level. With
its own budget, that improvements to the Sudan aviation
regard to Red Wings, FATA informed that following
safety system had been possible through the use of
suspension of its AOC in February 2013, this air
external expertise, and that it was actively recruiting
carrier had undergone significant corporate devel
locally and raising salaries to be competitive with the
opments. Also, depending on the outcome of the
industry. SCAA stated that only 6 air carriers were
inspection of the carrier, on-going at the time of the
now certified to operate international flights (Sudan
meeting, commercial air operations might be re-auth
Airways, Marshland Aviation, Badr Airlines, Sun Air
orised. The Commission recommended a thorough
Aviation, Nova Airways and Tarco Air) with a further
check of the level of readiness of Red Wings to
7 air carriers restricted to domestic operations. The
perform commercial air operations to the EU before
SCAA briefed on the results of the ICVM in May
such operations be re-authorised and requested
2012, and noted that the level of effective implemen
information thereof prior to the next meeting of the
tation of ICAO Standards was now high, particularly in
Air Safety Committee..
Flight Operations and Airworthiness.
(105) The SCAA further informed that they had conducted a
(99) Following the meeting, FATA provided further
information. In particular, it reported that Red Wings
risk assessment concerning the continued operation of
had been re-authorised to perform commercial oper
old, Soviet-built, aircraft which resulted in the
ations as of 17 June 2013.
grounding of 50% of those aircraft on the Sudan

Register.
(100) The Commission, EASA and Member States shall
(106) On 4 June 2013 the SCAA provided to the Commission
continue to closely monitor the safety performance of
a copy of their AOC Register showing 18 air carriers
the air carriers, certified in the Russian Federation,
with AOCs, of which 6 where currently suspended.
operating to the Union. The Commission shall continue
They also provided details of the revocation of the
to exchange safety related information with the Russian
AOCs of Attico Airlines (AOC No. 023); Sudanese
competent authorities in order to confirm that findings
States Aviation Company (AOC No. 010); Azza Air
resulting from SAFA ramp inspections have been
Transport (AOC No 012); Almajarah Aviation (AOC
adequately addressed by the air carriers concerned.
No. 049); Helilift (AOC No. 042); and Feeder Airlines
(AOC No. 050). On the basis of the information
provided by the SCAA Annex A should be updated
accordingly.
(101) Should the results of ramp inspections or any other
relevant safety information indicate that international
safety standards are not being met, the Commission
would be forced to take action in accordance with Regu
(107) The SCAA made a presentation to the Air Safety
lation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Committee on 25 June 2013. The SCAA was accom
panied by the Director General of the Arab Civil
Aviation Commission ('ACAC'), who acknowledged that
the EU Safety List can act as a catalyst for states to
Sudan
address systemic safety issues, noted the benefit of
States working together in a regional context and high
(102) Consultations with the Sudan Civil Aviation Authority
lighted the support which ACAC is providing in this
('SCAA') continued with the aim of confirming that
respect.
Sudan is progressing in its work to reform its civil
aviation safety system in order to address the safety
findings raised by ICAO during the USOAP audit of
2006 and the ICVM audit conducted in December
(108) The SCAA, in addition to the points made during the
2011. Those audits led to a SSC related to the certifi
meeting on 29 April 2013, briefed the Committee about
cation process for the issuance of air operator certificates.
the plan for inspecting staff to attend the ICAO Inspector
Course in July and August 2013 and the removal,
planned for July 2013, of all aircraft of types Tupolev
Tu134 and Antonov An12 from the Sudanese aircraft
(103) On 3 January 2013, the SCAA informed the Commission
register. The SCAA also briefed that all air carriers in
that the SCAA had improved its oversight capabilities,
Sudan are expected to be compliant with safety
including the system for the certification and supervision
requirements by the end of 2013.

---

L 190/64
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
(109) The Air Safety Committee welcomed the major progress
INAC also explained that the recent ICAO's ICVM
reported by the competent authorities of Sudan in the
mission, which took place between 22 and 28 May
rectification of the deficiencies identified by ICAO but
2013, should result in an improvement in the
recognised that there was still some way to go to
country's current level of implementation of ICAO stan
arrive at a situation where both the SCAA and the air
dards.
carriers under its supervision will be in a position to
ensure full compliance with ICAO standards. The
Commission will therefore continue to closely monitor
(115) INAC made a presentation to the Air Safety Committee
the progress made by the SCAA with a view to reviewing
on 26 June 2013. They briefed the Committee about the
the case at future Air Safety Committee meetings.
points discussed in the meeting held on 7 June 2013.
Conviasa
(116) Conviasa also made a presentation to the Air Safety
Committee on 26 June 2013. They briefed the
(110) One air carrier certified in the Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela, Conviasa, has been subject to an operating
Committee about the points discussed in the meeting
ban since April 2012 given very poor performance in
held on 7 June 2013 and emphasised that, should they
SAFA checks, several accidents and absence of adequate
be allowed to restart operations into the Union, they
response to the requests of information made by the Air
would adopt a mixed mode of operations, combining
Safety Committee. Following this, the Commission
the operation of their own Airbus A340-200 with a
agreed with the competent authorities of Venezuela, on
wet lease operation of an equivalent aircraft type.
18 June 2012, a roadmap for resolving identified safety
deficiencies and allowing a review of the Union decision.
(117) On the basis of the audit conducted by Spain and the
recent visit by ICAO as well as the presentations made by
INAC and Conviasa, the Air Safety Committee welcomed
(111) Consultations with the Venezuela Civil Aviation
the major and extensive progress made in the rectifi
Authority ('INAC') continued in 2013 with the aim of
cation of the deficiencies identified by the Air Safety
confirming that Venezuela is progressing in its work to
Committee in 2012. Taking into account this progress,
further improve its oversight of the air operators and
on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
ensuring that Conviasa continues to work toward
Conviasa should be removed from Annex A.
raising its safety status to fully meet the required inter

national standards.
(118) Member States will verify the effective compliance with
relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of
(112) In May 2013, the competent authorities of Venezuela
ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of air
provided to the Commission, via the Spanish
carriers licensed in Venezuela pursuant to Regulation
competent authorities, a series of written submissions
(EU) No 965/2012.
detailing the implementation of some of the actions in

the roadmap agreed in June 2012.
(119) Should the results of ramp checks or any other relevant
safety information indicate that international safety
(113) Subsequently, the Commission, assisted by EASA, held a
standards are not being met, the Commission would be
meeting with INAC and Conviasa on 7 June 2013.
forced to take action in accordance with Regulation (EC)
Conviasa briefed extensively on the improvements
No 2111/2005.
made in order to address findings of past SAFA inspec
tions, on lessons learned and recommendations
stemming from accidents, as well as on those changes
introduced as a consequence of the latest INAC audit. In
(120) In the context of updating the Annexes, Article 8(2) of
particular, Conviasa highlighted its system of pre-flight
Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 recognizes the need for
SAFA-like checks and improvements made in its safety
decisions to be taken swiftly and, where appropriate,
management systems, overall quality, maintenance and
urgently, given the safety implications. Experience with
continuous airworthiness processes. Conviasa also
the updating of the Annexes has also showed that it is
informed of their expansion plans and fleet renewal for
essential, for the protection of sensitive information and
the years to come, with the progressive retirement of the
for minimising commercial impacts, that the decisions in
ageing Boeing B737-200 and B737-300 aircraft types
the context of updating the list are published and enter
and the acceleration of the already started introduction
into force very quickly after their adoption.
of the new aircraft type Embraer ERJ 190.
(121) Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 should therefore be
(114) INAC briefed on their internal structure and mechanisms,
amended accordingly.
provided detailed information on the procedures in place
to deal with the EU SAFA results of Venezuelan air
carriers, and expanded on the planning and implemen
(122) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
tation of their oversight activities, which will soon
accordance with the opinion of the Air Safety
include ramp inspections to their national air carriers.
Committee.

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/65
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
2. Annex B is replaced by the text set out in Annex B to this
Regulation.
Article 1
Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 is amended as follows:
Article 2
1. Annex A is replaced by the text set out in Annex A to this
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its
Regulation.
publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 July 2013.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Siim KALLAS
Vice-President

---

L 190/66
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
ANNEX A
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
BLUE WING AIRLINES SRBWA-01/2002 BWI Suriname
MERIDIAN AIRWAYS LTD AOC
023 MAG Republic
of
Ghana
All air carriers certified by the
Islamic Republic of
authorities with responsibility for
Afghanistan
regulatory oversight of Afghanistan,
including
ARIANA AFGHAN AIRLINES AOC
009 AFG Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
KAM AIR AOC
001 KMF Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
PAMIR AIRLINES Unknown PIR Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
SAFI AIRWAYS AOC
181 SFW Islamic
Republic
of
Afghanistan
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of Angola
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Angola,
with the exception of TAAG
Angola Airlines put in Annex B,
including
AEROJET AO
008-01/11 TEJ Republic
of
Angola
AIR26 AO
003-01/11-DCD DCD Republic
of
Angola
AIR GICANGO 009 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
AIR JET AO
006-01/11-MBC MBC Republic
of
Angola
AIR NAVE 017 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
ANGOLA AIR SERVICES 006 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
DIEXIM 007 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
FLY540 AO
004-01
FLYA Unknown Republic
of
Angola
GIRA GLOBO 008 GGL Republic
of
Angola
HELIANG 010 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
HELIMALONGO AO
005-01/11 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
MAVEWA 016 Unknown Republic
of
Angola
( 1 ) Air carriers listed in Annex A could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not
subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/67
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
SONAIR AO
002-01/10-SOR SOR Republic
of
Angola
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of Benin
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Benin,
including
AERO BENIN PEA
No
AEB Republic
of
Benin
014/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS
AFRICA AIRWAYS Unknown AFF Republic
of
Benin
ALAFIA JET PEA
No
014/ANAC/
Unknown Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTTATP-
PR/DEA/SCS
BENIN GOLF AIR PEA
No
012/MDCTTP-
BGL Republic
of
Benin
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
BENIN LITTORAL AIRWAYS PEA
No
LTL Republic
of
Benin
013/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
COTAIR PEA
No
COB Republic
of
Benin
015/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.
ROYAL AIR PEA
No
11/ANAC/
BNR Republic
of
Benin
MDCTTP-PR/DEA/SCS
TRANS AIR BENIN PEA
No
TNB Republic
of
Benin
016/MDCTTTATP-
PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of Congo
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of the Republic
of Congo, including
AERO SERVICE RAC06-002 RSR Republic
of
Congo
CANADIAN AIRWAYS CONGO RAC06-012 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
EMERAUDE RAC06-008 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
EQUAFLIGHT SERVICES RAC
06-003 EKA Republic
of
Congo
EQUAJET RAC06-007 EKJ Republic
of
Congo
EQUATORIAL CONGO AIRLINES S.A. RAC
06-014 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
MISTRAL AVIATION RAC06-011 Unknown Republic
of
Congo
TRANS AIR CONGO RAC
06-001 TSG Republic
of
Congo

---

L 190/68
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
All air carriers certified by the
Democratic Republic of
authorities with responsibility for
Congo (DRC)
regulatory oversight of Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC), including
AFRICAN AIR SERVICE COMMUTER 104/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (DRC)
AIR BARAKA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
002/2011
Congo (DRC)
AIR CASTILLA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
007/2010
Congo (DRC)
AIR FAST CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0112/2011
Congo (DRC)
AIR MALEBO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0122/2012
Congo (DRC)
AIR KASAI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0053/2012
Congo (DRC)
AIR KATANGA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0056/2012
Congo (DRC)
AIR TROPIQUES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
00625/2011
Congo (DRC)
ARMI GLOBAL BUSINESS AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
029/2012
Congo (DRC)
BIEGA AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
051/2012
Congo (DRC)
BLUE AIRLINES 106/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 BUL Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (DRC)
BLUE SKY 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0028/2012
Congo (DRC)
BUSINESS AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
ABB Democratic
Republic
of
048/09
Congo (DRC)
BUSY BEE CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0064/2010
Congo (DRC)
CETRACA 105/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 CER Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (DRC)
CHC STELLAVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0078/2011
Congo (DRC)
CONGO EXPRESS AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
EXY Democratic
Republic
of
059/2012
Congo (DRC)
COMPAGNIE AFRICAINE
409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
D’AVIATION (CAA)
0050/2012
Congo (DRC)

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/69
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
DOREN AIR CONGO 102/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (DRC)
EPHRATA AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
040/2011
Congo (DRC)
EAGLES SERVICES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0196/2011
Congo (DRC)
FILAIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
037/2008
Congo (DRC)
FLY CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0126/2012
Congo (DRC)
GALAXY KAVATSI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0027/2008
Congo (DRC)
GILEMBE AIR SOUTENANCE (GISAIR) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0082/2010
Congo (DRC)
GOMA EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0051/2011
Congo (DRC)
GOMAIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
011/2010
Congo (DRC)
GTRA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0060/2011
Congo (DRC)
INTERNATIONAL TRANS AIR
409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
BUSINESS (ITAB)
0065/2010
Congo (DRC)
JET CONGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0011/2012
Congo (DRC)
KATANGA EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0083/2010
Congo (DRC)
KATANGA WINGS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0092/2011
Congo (DRC)
KIN AVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0059/2010
Congo (DRC)
KORONGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
001/2011
Congo (DRC)
LIGNES ARIENNES CONGOLAISES
Ministerial signature
LCG Democratic
Republic
of
(LAC)
(ordonnance No. 78/205)
Congo (DRC)
MANGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
009/2011
Congo (DRC)
MAVIVI AIR TRADE 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
00/2011
Congo (DRC)

---

L 190/70
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
OKAPI AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
OKP Democratic
Republic
of
086/2011
Congo (DRC)
PATRON AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0066/2011
Congo (DRC)
PEGASUS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
021/2012
Congo (DRC)
SAFE AIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
021/2008
Congo (DRC)
SERVICES AIR 103/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
Congo (DRC)
STELLAR AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
056/2011
Congo (DRC)
SION AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0081/2011
Congo (DRC)
SWALA AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0084/2010
Congo (DRC)
TRACEP CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0085/2010
Congo (DRC)
TRANSAIR CARGO SERVICES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
073/2011
Congo (DRC)
WALTAIR AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
004/2011
Congo (DRC)
WILL AIRLIFT 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
Unknown Democratic
Republic
of
0247/2011
Congo (DRC)
WIMBI DIRA AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/
WDA Democratic
Republic
of
039/2008
Congo (DRC)
All air carriers certified by the
Djibouti
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Djibouti,
including
DAALLO AIRLINES Unknown DAO Djibouti
All air carriers certified by the
Equatorial Guinea
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Equatorial
Guinea, including
CRONOS AIRLINES 2011/0004/MTTCT/
Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
DGAC/SOPS
CEIBA INTERCONTINENTAL 2011/0001/MTTCT/
CEL Equatorial
Guinea
DGAC/SOPS

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/71
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
PUNTO AZUL 2012/0006/MTTCT/
Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
DGAC/SOPS
TANGO AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Equatorial
Guinea
All air carriers certified by the
Eritrea
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Eritrea,
including
ERITREAN AIRLINES AOC
No
004 ERT Eritrea
NASAIR ERITREA AOC
No
005 NAS Eritrea
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of Indonesia
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Indonesia,
with the exception of Garuda
Indonesia, Airfast Indonesia,
Mandala Airlines, EkspresTrans
portasiAntarbenua and Indonesia
Air Asia, including
AIR BORN INDONESIA 135-055 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
AIR PACIFIC UTAMA 135-020 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ALFA TRANS DIRGANTATA 135-012 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ANGKASA SUPER SERVICES 135-050 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ASCO NUSA AIR 135-022 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ASI PUDJIASTUTI 135-028 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
AVIASTAR MANDIRI 135-029 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
CITILINK INDONESIA 121-046 CTV Republic
of
Indonesia
DABI AIR NUSANTARA 135-030 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
DERAYA AIR TAXI 135-013 DRY Republic
of
Indonesia
DERAZONA AIR SERVICE 135-010 DRZ Republic
of
Indonesia
DIRGANTARA AIR SERVICE 135-014 DIR Republic
of
Indonesia
EASTINDO 135-038 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ENGGANG AIR SERVICE 135-045 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
ERSA EASTERN AVIATION 135-047 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
GATARI AIR SERVICE 135-018 GHS Republic
of
Indonesia
HEAVY LIFT 135-042 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
INDONESIA AIR TRANSPORT 121-034 IDA Republic
of
Indonesia

---

L 190/72
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
INTAN ANGKASA AIR SERVICE 135-019 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
JAYAWIJAYA DIRGANTARA 121-044 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
JOHNLIN AIR TRANSPORT 135-043 JLB Republic
of
Indonesia
KAL STAR 121-037 KLS Republic
of
Indonesia
KARTIKA AIRLINES 121-003 KAE Republic
of
Indonesia
KOMALA INDONESIA 135-051 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
KURA-KURA AVIATION 135-016 KUR Republic
of
Indonesia
LION MENTARI AIRLINES 121-010 LNI Republic
of
Indonesia
MANUNGGAL AIR SERVICE 121-020 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
MARTABUANA ABADION 135-049 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
MATTHEW AIR NUSANTARA 135-048 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
MERPATI NUSANTARA AIRLINES 121-002 MNA Republic
of
Indonesia
MIMIKA AIR 135-007 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NATIONAL UTILITY HELICOPTER 135-011 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NUSANTARA AIR CHARTER 121-022 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
NUSANTARA BUANA AIR 135-041 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PACIFIC ROYALE AIRWAYS 121-045 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PEGASUS AIR SERVICES 135-036 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PELITA AIR SERVICE 121-008 PAS Republic
of
Indonesia
PENERBANGAN ANGKASA SEMESTA 135-026 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
PURA WISATA BARUNA 135-025 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
RIAU AIRLINES 121-016 RIU Republic
of
Indonesia
SAYAP GARUDA INDAH 135-004 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SKY AVIATION 135-044 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
SMAC 135-015 SMC Republic
of
Indonesia
SRIWIJAYA AIR 121-035 SJY Republic
of
Indonesia
SURVEI UDARA PENAS 135-006 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/73
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
SURYA AIR 135-046 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRANSNUSA AVIATION MANDIRI 121-048 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRANSWISATA PRIMA AVIATION 135-021 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRAVEL EXPRESS AVIATION
121-038 XAR Republic
of
Indonesia
SERVICE
TRAVIRA UTAMA 135-009 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
TRI MG INTRA ASIA AIRLINES 121-018 TMG Republic
of
Indonesia
TRIGANA AIR SERVICE 121-006 TGN Republic
of
Indonesia
UNINDO 135-040 Unknown Republic
of
Indonesia
WING ABADI AIRLINES 121-012 WON Republic
of
Indonesia
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of Kazakhstan
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Kazakhstan,
with the exception of Air Astana,
including
AIR ALMATY AK-0453-11 LMY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AIR TRUST AIRCOMPANY AK-0455-12 RTR Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ASIA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES AK-0317-12 CID Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ATMA AIRLINES AK-0437-10 AMA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
AVIA-JAYNAR / AVIA-ZHAYNAR AK-067-12 SAP Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BEYBARS AIRCOMPANY AK-0442-11 BBS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BEK AIR AK-0463-12 BEK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
BURUNDAYAVIA AIRLINES AK-0456-12 BRY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
COMLUX-KZ AK-0449-11 KAZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
DETA AIR AK-0458-12 DET Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EAST WING AK-0465-12 EWZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
LUK AERO (FORMER EASTERN
AK-0464-12 LIS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EXPRESS)
EURO-ASIA AIR AK-0441-11 EAK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
EURO-ASIA AIR INTERNATIONAL AK-0445-11 KZE Republic
of
Kazakhstan
FLY JET KZ AK-0446-11 FJK Republic
of
Kazakhstan

---

L 190/74
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
INVESTAVIA AK-0447-11 TLG Republic
of
Kazakhstan
IRTYSH AIR AK-0439-11 MZA Republic
of
Kazakhstan
JET AIRLINES AK-0459-12 SOZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
JET ONE AK-0468-12 JKZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIR JET AK-0442-11 KEJ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAIRTRANS AIRLINE AK-0466-12 KUY Republic
of
Kazakhstan
KAZAVIASPAS AK-0452-11 KZS Republic
of
Kazakhstan
MEGA AIRLINES AK-0462-12 MGK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
PRIME AVIATION AK-0448-11 PKZ Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SAMAL AIR AK-0454-12 SAV Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SEMEYAVIA AK-450-11 SMK Republic
of
Kazakhstan
SCAT AK-0460-12 VSV Republic
of
Kazakhstan
ZHETYSU AIRCOMPANY AK-0438-11 JTU Republic
of
Kazakhstan
All air carriers certified by the
Kyrgyz Republic
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of the Kyrgyz
Republic, including
SKY BISHKEK Unknown BIS Kyrgyz
Republic
AIR MANAS 17 MBB Kyrgyz
Republic
AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY 23 AVJ Kyrgyz
Republic
CENTRAL ASIAN AVIATION
13 CBK Kyrgyz
Republic
SERVICES (CAAS)
CLICK AIRWAYS 11 CGK Kyrgyz
Republic
STATE AVIATION ENTERPRISE
20 DAM Kyrgyz
Republic
UNDER THE MINISTRY OF
EMERGENCY SITUATIONS (SAEMES)
AIR BISHKEK (FORMERLY EASTOK
15 EAA Kyrgyz
Republic
AVIA)
KYRGYZ TRANS AVIA 31 KTC Kyrgyz
Republic
KYRGYZSTAN 03 LYN Kyrgyz
Republic
MANAS AIRWAYS 42 BAM Kyrgyz
Republic

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/75
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
S GROUP AVIATION
6 SGL Kyrgyz
Republic
SKY KG AIRLINES 41 KGK Kyrgyz
Republic
SKY WAY AIR 39 SAB Kyrgyz
Republic
SUPREME AVIATION 40 SGK Kyrgyz
Republic
VALOR AIR 07 VAC Kyrgyz
Republic
All air carriers certified by the
Liberia
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Liberia.
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of Gabon
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of the Republic
of Gabon, with the exception of
Gabon Airlines, Afrijet and SN2AG
put in Annex B, including
AFRIC AVIATION 010/MTAC/ANAC-
EKG Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
AIR SERVICES SA 004/MTAC/ANAC-
RVS Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
AIR TOURIST (ALLEGIANCE) 007/MTAC/ANAC-
LGE Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
NATIONALE ET REGIONALE
008/MTAC/ANAC-
NRG Republic
of
Gabon
TRANSPORT (NATIONALE)
G/DSA
SCD AVIATION 005/MTAC/ANAC-
SCY Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
SKY GABON 009/MTAC/ANAC-
SKG Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
SOLENTA AVIATION GABON 006/MTAC/ANAC- SVG Republic
of
Gabon
G/DSA
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of Mozambique
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of the Republic
of Mozambique, including
AERO-SERVICOS SARL MOZ-08 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
AEROVISAO DE MOZAMBIQUE Unknown Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CFA MOZAMBIQUE MOZ-10 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CFM-TRANSPORTES E TRABALHO
MOZ-07 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
AEREO SA

---

L 190/76
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
COASTAL AVIATION MOZ-15 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
CR AVIATION MOZ-14 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
EMILIO AIR CHARTER LDA MOZ-05 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
ETA AIR CHARTER LDA MOZ-04 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
HELICOPTEROS CAPITAL MOZ-11 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
KAYA AIRLINES MOZ-09 KYY Republic
of
Mozambique
MOZAMBIQUE AIRLINES (LINHAS
MOZ-01 LAM Republic
of
Mozambique
AEREAS DE MOAMBIQUE)
MOZAMBIQUE EXPRESS/MEX MOZ-02 MXE Republic
of
Mozambique
UNIQUE AIR CHARTER MOZ-13 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
SAFARI AIR MOZ-12 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
TTA SARL MOZ-16 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
VR CROPSPRAYERS LDA MOZ-06 Unknown Republic
of
Mozambique
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of the Philippines
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of the Philip
pines, with the exception of Phil
ippine Airlines, including
AEROEQUIPEMENT AVIATION 2010037 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIR ASIA PHILIPPINES 2012047 APG Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIR PHILIPPINES CORPORATION 2009006 GAP Republic
of
the
Philippines
AIR JUAN AVIATION 2013053 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ASIA AIRCRAFT OVERSEAS
2012048 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
PHILIPPINES INC.
ASIAN AEROSPACE CORPORATION 2012050 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL 2012049 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
AYALA AVIATION CORP. 4AN9900003 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CANADIAN HELICOPTERS
2010026 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
PHILIPPINES INC.
CEBU PACIFIC AIR 2009002 CEB Republic
of
the
Philippines

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/77
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
CM AERO SERVICES 20110401 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CYCLONE AIRWAYS 2010034 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
FAR EAST AVIATION SERVICES 2009013 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
INAEC AVIATION CORP. 2010028 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
INTERISLAND AIRLINES 2010023 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ISLAND AVIATION 2009009 SOY Republic
of
the
Philippines
ISLAND TRANSVOYAGER 2010022 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
LION AIR 2009019 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
MACRO ASIA AIR TAXI SERVICES 2010029 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
MAGNUM AIR 2012051 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
MISIBIS AVIATION & DEVELOPMENT 2010020 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
CORP
NORTHSKY AIR INC. 2011042 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
OMNI AVIATION CORP. 2010033 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ROYAL AIR CHARTER SERVICES INC. 2010024 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ROYAL STAR AVIATION, INC. 2010021 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SOUTH EAST ASIAN AIRLINES 2009
004 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SOUTH EAST ASIAN AIRLINES
2012052 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
(SEAIR) INTERNATIONAL
SOUTHERN AIR FLIGHT SERVICES 2011045 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
SUBIC SEAPLANE, INC. 2011035 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
WCC AVIATION COMPANY 2009015 Unknown Republic
of
the
Philippines
ZEST AIRWAYS INCORPORATED 2009003 EZD Republic
of
the
Philippines
All air carriers certified by the
Sao Tome and Principe
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Sao Tome
and Principe, including
AFRICA CONNECTION 10/AOC/2008 ACH Sao
Tome
and
Principe
BRITISH GULF INTERNATIONAL
01/AOC/2007 BGI Sao
Tome
and
Principe
COMPANY LTD

---

L 190/78
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
EXECUTIVE JET SERVICES 03/AOC/2006 EJZ Sao
Tome
and
Principe
GLOBAL AVIATION OPERATION 04/AOC/2006 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
GOLIAF AIR 05/AOC/2001 GLE Sao
Tome
and
Principe
ISLAND OIL EXPLORATION 01/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
STP AIRWAYS 03/AOC/2006 STP Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSAFRIK INTERNATIONAL LTD 02/AOC/2002 TFK Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSCARG 01/AOC/2009 Unknown Sao
Tome
and
Principe
TRANSLIZ AVIATION (TMS) 02/AOC/2007 TLZ Sao
Tome
and
Principe
All air carriers certified by the
Sierra Leone
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Sierra
Leone, including
AIR RUM, LTD Unknown RUM Sierra
Leone
DESTINY AIR SERVICES, LTD Unknown DTY Sierra
Leone
HEAVYLIFT CARGO Unknown Unknown Sierra
Leone
ORANGE AIR SIERRA LEONE LTD Unknown ORJ Sierra
Leone
PARAMOUNT AIRLINES, LTD Unknown PRR Sierra
Leone
SEVEN FOUR EIGHT AIR SERVICES
Unknown SVT Sierra
Leone
LTD
TEEBAH AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Sierra
Leone
All air carriers certified by the
Republic of Sudan
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Sudan,
including
ALFA AIRLINES 054 AAJ Republic
of
the
Sudan
ALMAJAL AVIATION SERVICE 015 MGG Republic
of
the
Sudan
BADER AIRLINES 035 BDR Republic
of
the
Sudan
BENTIU AIR TRANSPORT 029 BNT Republic
of
the
Sudan
BLUE BIRD AVIATION 011 BLB Republic
of
the
Sudan
DOVE AIRLINES 052 DOV Republic
of
the
Sudan
ELIDINER AVIATION 008 DND Republic
of
the
Sudan

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/79
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
Air Operator Certificate
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, ('AOC') Number or Operating
ICAO airline
if different)
Licence Number
designation number
State of the Operator
FOURTY EIGHT AVIATION 053 WHB Republic
of
the
Sudan
GREEN FLAG AVIATION 017 Unknown Republic
of
the
Sudan
HELEJETIC AIR 057 HJT Republic
of
the
Sudan
KATA AIR TRANSPORT 009 KTV Republic
of
the
Sudan
KUSH AVIATION 060 KUH Republic
of
the
Sudan
MARSLAND COMPANY 040 MSL Republic
of
the
Sudan
MID AIRLINES 025 NYL Republic
of
the
Sudan
NOVA AIRLINES 046 NOV Republic
of
the
Sudan
SUDAN AIRWAYS 001 SUD Republic
of
the
Sudan
SUN AIR COMPANY 051 SNR Republic
of
the
Sudan
TARCO AIRLINES 056 TRQ Republic
of
the
Sudan
All air carriers certified by the
Swaziland
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Swaziland,
including
SWAZILAND AIRLINK Unknown SZL Swaziland
All air carriers certified by the
Zambia
authorities with responsibility for
regulatory oversight of Zambia,
including
ZAMBEZI AIRLINES Z/AOC/001/2009 ZMA Zambia

---

L 190/80
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
11.7.2013
ANNEX B
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS
WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its AOC Air Operator Certificate designation State of the Operator Aircraft
type
restricted
when available,
State of registry
(and its trading name, if
('AOC') Number
number
construction serial
different)
number(s)
AIR KORYO GAC-AOC/KOR-01 KOR DPRK All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the
DPRK
exception of: 2 aircraft exception of:
of type TU- 204
P-632, P-633
AFRIJET ( 1 ) 002/MTAC/ANAC-
ABS Republic
of All fleet with the
All fleet with the
Republic of Gabon
G/DSA
Gabon
exception of: 2 aircraft exception of:
of type Falcon 50, 2
TR-LGV; TR-LGY; TR-
aircraft of type Falcon AFJ; TR-AFR
900
AIR ASTANA ( 2 ) AK-0443-11 KZR Kazakhstan All
fleet
with
the All fleet with the
Aruba (Kingdom of
exception of: aircraft
exception of: aircraft
the Netherlands)
of type Boeing B767, within the Boeing
aircraft of type Boeing B767 fleet, as
B757, aircraft of type mentioned on the
Airbus A319/320/321 AOC; aircraft within
the Boeing B757 fleet,
as mentioned on the
AOC; aircraft within
the Airbus
A319/320/321 fleet,
as mentioned on the
AOC
AIRLIFT
AOC 017 ALE Republic
of All fleet with the
All fleet with the
Republic of Ghana
INTERNATIONAL
Ghana
exception of: 2 aircraft exception of:
(GH) LTD
of type DC8-63F
9G-TOP and 9G-RAC
AIR MADAGASCAR 5R-M01/2009 MDG Madagascar All
fleet
with
the All fleet with the
Republic of
exception of: 3 aircraft exception of:
Madagascar
of type Boeing B737- 5R-MFH, 5R-MFI, 5R-
300, 2 aircraft of type MFL, 5R-MJE, 5R-MJF,
ATR 72-500, 1
5R-MJG, 5R-MVT, 5R-
aircraft of type ATR
MGC, 5R-MGD, 5R-
42-500, 1 aircraft of MGF
type ATR 42-320 and
3 aircraft of type DHC
6-300
AIR SERVICE
06-819/TA-
KMD Comoros All
fleet
with
the
All fleet with the
Comoros
COMORES
15/DGACM
exception of: LET 410 exception of:
UVP
D6-CAM (851336)
GABON
001/MTAC/ANAC GBK Republic
of All fleet with the
All fleet with the
Republic of Gabon
AIRLINES ( 3 )
Gabon
exception of: 1 aircraft exception of:
of type Boeing B767- TR-LHP
200
( 1 ) Air carriers listed in Annex B could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not
subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

---

EN
11.7.2013 Official
Journal
of
the
European
Union L
190/81
Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
ICAO airline
Registration mark(s) and,
as indicated on its AOC Air Operator Certificate designation State of the Operator Aircraft
type
restricted
when available,
State of registry
(and its trading name, if
('AOC') Number
number
construction serial
different)
number(s)
IRAN AIR ( 4 ) FS100 IRA Islamic
Republic
All fleet with the
All fleet with the
Islamic Republic of
of Iran
exception of: 14
exception of:
Iran
aircraft of type Airbus EP-IBA
A300, 8 aircraft of
EP-IBB
type Airbus A310, 1
EP-IBC
aircraft Boeing B737
EP-IBD
EP-IBG
EP-IBH
EP-IBI
EP-IBJ
EP-IBM
EP-IBN
EP-IBO
EP-IBS
EP-IBT
EP-IBV
EP-IBX
EP-IBZ
EP-ICE
EP-ICF
EP-IBK
EP-IBL
EP-IBP
EP-IBQ
EP-AGA
NOUVELLE AIR
003/MTAC/ANAC- NVS Republic
of All fleet with the
All fleet with the
Republic of Gabon;
AFFAIRES GABON
G/DSA
Gabon
exception of: 1 aircraft exception of:
Republic of South
(SN2AG)
of type Challenger CL- TR-AAG, ZS-AFG
Africa
601, 1 aircraft of type
HS-125-800
TAAG ANGOLA
001 DTA Republic
of All fleet with the
All fleet with the
Republic of Angola
AIRLINES
Angola
exception of: 5 aircraft exception of:
of type Boeing B777 D2-TED, D2-TEE, D2-
and 4 aircraft of type TEF, D2-TEG, D2-
Boeing B737-700
TEH, D2-TBF, D2-
TBG, D2-TBH, D2-TBJ
( 1 ) Afrijet is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current level of operations within the Union.
( 2 ) For their current level of operations within the Union Air Astana is only allowed to use the specific aircraft types mentioned, provided that they are registered in Aruba
and that all changes to the AOC are timely submitted to the Commission and to Eurocontrol.
( 3 ) Gabon Airlines is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current level of operations within the Union.
( 4 ) Iran Air is allowed to operate to the Union using the specific aircraft under the conditions set out in Recital (69) of Regulation (EU) No 590/2010, OJ L 170, 6.7.2010,
p.15.

---

Document Outline

• �

---