Commission Decision

of 24 September 2009

excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)

(notified under document C(2009) 7044)

(Only the Czech, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Slovenian and Spanish texts are authentic)

(2009/721/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [1], and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [2], and in particular Article 31 thereof,

Having consulted the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,

Whereas:

(1) Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them.

(2) The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the report issued on the outcome has been examined by the Commission.

(3) Under Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed Community rules may be financed.

(4) In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, hereinafter referred to as EAGF, and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, hereinafter referred to as EAFRD.

(5) The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States.

(6) As regards the cases covered by this Decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Community rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject.

(7) This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 6 January 2009 and relating to its content,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States’ accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, under the EAGF or under the EAFRD shall be excluded from Community financing because it does not comply with Community rules.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2009.

For the Commission

Mariann Fischer Boel

Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

[2] OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------

ANNEX

BUDGET ITEM 6701

MS | Measure | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |

AT | Cross-compliance | 2006-2007 | Deficiencies concerning the system of application of reductions. Non-respect of Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 for cattle and sheep holders | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –981349,96 | 0,00 | –981349,96 |

AT | Cross-compliance | 2007 | Non-respect of Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 for farmers with bovine and/or sheep and goats | one-off | | EUR | –530810,86 | 0,00 | –530810,86 |

Total AT | –1512160,82 | 0,00 | –1512160,82 |

BE | Certification | 2004 | Extrapolation of random error | one-off | | EUR | –98303,45 | 0,00 | –98303,45 |

BE | Certification | 2005 | Extrapolation of random error | one-off | | EUR | –260740,00 | 0,00 | –260740,00 |

Total BE | –359043,45 | 0,00 | –359043,45 |

CZ | Milk powder for casein | 2004 | Wrong timing of samples taking and inappropriate product storage | flat-rate | 5 | CZK | –2653522,92 | 0,00 | –2653522,92 |

CZ | Milk powder for casein | 2005 | Wrong timing of samples taking and inappropriate product storage | flat-rate | 5 | CZK | –2723245,64 | 0,00 | –2723245,64 |

Total CZ | –5376768,56 | 0,00 | –5376768,56 |

DE | Cross-compliance | 2006 | Non-respect of Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 | one-off | | EUR | –82051,60 | 0,00 | –82051,60 |

DE | Financial audit — Late payments | 2007 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | –65908,59 | –65908,59 | 0,00 |

DE | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2007 | Overshooting of rural development allocations and correction due to clearance decisions | one-off | | EUR | –1286683,79 | –1286683,79 | 0,00 |

DE | Irregularities | 2008 | Reimbursement concerning irregularity cases | one-off | | EUR | 104567,45 | 0,00 | 104,567.45 |

DE | Rural Development EAGGF Axis 2 (2000-2006, area related measures) | 2006 | Absence of cross-checks with central livestock databank in case of applications for agri-environmental measures with livestock density limitation as an eligibility condition | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –418300,00 | 0,00 | –418300,00 |

Total DE | –1748376,53 | –1352592,38 | –395784,15 |

ES | Meat premiums — Ewe and goats | 2003 | Absence of on-the-spot-checks during first month of retention and their general poor quality | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –2071611,91 | 0,00 | –2071611,91 |

ES | Meat premiums — Ewe and goats | 2004 | Absence of on-the-spot-checks during first month of retention and their general poor quality | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –2021847,48 | 0,00 | –2021847,48 |

ES | Meat premiums — Ewe and goats | 2005 | Absence of on-the-spot-checks during first month of retention and their general poor quality | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –2008918,46 | 0,00 | –2008918,46 |

ES | Meat premiums — Ewe and goats | 2006 | Absence of on-the-spot-checks during first month of retention and their general poor quality | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –1512,05 | 0,00 | –1512,05 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2003 | Weaknesses in key and ancillary controls in Andalusia | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –15571890,92 | 0,00 | –15571890,92 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2003 | Weaknesses in key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –7493167,92 | 0,00 | –7493167,92 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2003 | Wrong calculation of sanctions as a result of inappropriate application of technical tolerance margins in Andalusia | one-off | | EUR | –7804696,43 | 0,00 | –7804696,43 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2004 | Weaknesses in key and ancillary controls in Andalusia | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –470563,99 | 0,00 | –470563,99 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2004 | Weaknesses in key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –120076,26 | 0,00 | –120076,26 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2005 | Weaknesses in key and ancillary controls in Andalusia | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –127706,94 | 0,00 | –127706,94 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2005 | Weaknesses in key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –35516,52 | 0,00 | –35516,52 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2006 | Weaknesses in key and ancillary controls in Andalusia | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –102574,75 | 0,00 | –102574,75 |

ES | Olive oil — Production aid | 2006 | Weaknesses in key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –14813,23 | 0,00 | –14813,23 |

ES | Olive oil — Production refund on olive oil for preserved food | 2003 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision run by Galician paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –56556,66 | 0,00 | –56556,66 |

ES | Olive oil — Production refund on olive oil for preserved food | 2004 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision run by Galician paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –247607,45 | 0,00 | –247607,45 |

ES | Olive oil — Production refund on olive oil for preserved food | 2005 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision run by Galician paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –158115,39 | 0,00 | –158115,39 |

ES | Olive oil — Production refund on olive oil for preserved food | 2006 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision run by Galician paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –199478,40 | 0,00 | –199478,40 |

ES | Olive oil — Production refund on olive oil for preserved food | 2007 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision run by Galician paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –1508,41 | 0,00 | –1508,41 |

ES | RD Guarantee Accompanying Measures (area related measures) | 2004 | Insufficient quality of on-the-spot checks and control reports. Only two good farming practices commitments checked | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –727721,00 | 0,00 | –727721,00 |

ES | RD Guarantee Accompanying Measures (area related measures) | 2005 | Insufficient quality of on-the-spot checks and control reports. Only two good farming practices commitments checked | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –1019192,00 | 0,00 | –1019192,00 |

Total ES | –40255076,17 | 0,00 | –40255076,17 |

FI | Meat premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Wrong calculation of sanctions concerning suckler cows | one-off | | EUR | –2902,49 | 0,00 | –2902,49 |

FI | Meat premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Late start of controls in 2003. Wrong calculation of sanctions concerning suckler cows | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –51722,18 | 0,00 | –51722,18 |

FI | Meat premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Wrong calculation of sanctions concerning suckler cows | one-off | | EUR | –3472,54 | 0,00 | –3472,54 |

FI | Meat premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Wrong calculation of sanctions concerning suckler cows | one-off | | EUR | –2225,89 | 0,00 | –2225,89 |

Total FI | –60323,10 | 0,00 | –60323,10 |

FR | Cross-compliance | 2006 | Claim year 2006: system of application of reductions and sanctions not in conformity with Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. Weaknesses in on-the-spot checks | flat rate | 10 | EUR | –74768,22 | 0,00 | –74768,22 |

FR | Cross-compliance | 2006 | Claim year 2005: system of application of reductions and sanctions not in conformity with Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. Weaknesses in on-the-spot checks | flat rate | 10 | EUR | –22865398,47 | 0,00 | –22865398,47 |

FR | Cross-compliance | 2007 | Claim year 2006: system of application of reductions and sanctions not in conformity with Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. Weaknesses in on-the-spot checks | flat rate | 10 | EUR | –48018996,45 | 0,00 | –48018996,45 |

FR | Cross-compliance | 2007 | Claim year 2005: system of application of reductions and sanctions not in conformity with Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. Weaknesses in on-the-spot checks | flat rate | 10 | EUR | –9305,52 | 0,00 | –9305,52 |

Total FR | –70968468,66 | 0,00 | –70968468,66 |

GB | Financial audit — Late payments | 2006 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | –5732301,16 | –5732301,16 | 0,00 |

GB | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2006 | Overshooting of rural development allocations | one-off | | EUR | –784708,59 | 0,00 | –784708,59 |

GB | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2006 | Overshooting of rural development allocations and correction of milk levies | one-off | | EUR | –4423891,69 | –4423891,69 | 0,00 |

Total GB | –10940901,44 | –10156192,85 | –784708,59 |

GR | Financial audit — Late payments | 2006 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | –4553141,32 | –4553141,32 | 0,00 |

GR | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2006 | Overshooting of financial ceilings, allocations and correction of milk levies | one-off | | EUR | –8746881,86 | –8746881,86 | 0,00 |

GR | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2006 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | | EUR | –1841695,81 | 0,00 | –1841695,81 |

GR | Fruit and vegetables — Tomato processing | 2006 | Weaknesses in area, accounting and administrative controls | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –1517924,28 | 0,00 | –1517924,28 |

GR | Olive oil — Improvement of quality of olive oil | 2004 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | | EUR | –337272,64 | 0,00 | –337272,64 |

GR | Public storage — Rice | 2006 | Improper time of weighing the stock and assessing missing quantities which led to undue costs of storage | one-off | | EUR | –110459,51 | 0,00 | –110459,51 |

GR | Public storage — Rice | 2007 | Improper time of weighing the stock and assessing missing quantities which led to undue costs of storage | one-off | | EUR | –55227,40 | 0,00 | –55227,40 |

Total GR | –17162602,82 | –13300023,18 | –3862579,64 |

HU | Direct payments | 2005 | Claim year 2004 — Weaknesses in LPIS | flat-rate | 2 | HUF | –159697460,46 | 0,00 | –159697460,46 |

HU | Direct payments | 2005 | Claim year 2004 — Weaknesses in LPIS, insufficient control of GAEC | flat-rate | 2 | HUF | –1565085360,96 | 0,00 | –1565085360,96 |

HU | Direct payments | 2006 | Claim year 2004 — Weaknesses in LPIS | flat-rate | 2 | HUF | –974468,50 | 0,00 | –974468,50 |

HU | Direct payments | 2006 | Claim year 2004 — Weaknesses in LPIS, insufficient control of GAEC | flat-rate | 2 | HUF | –2111378,44 | 0,00 | –2111378,44 |

HU | Direct payments | 2006 | Claim year 2005 — Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS | flat-rate | 2 | HUF | –1874226638,20 | 0,00 | –1874226638,20 |

HU | RD Guarantee Accompanying Measures (area related measures) | 2005 | Cross-checks with animal data base not satisfactory | one-off | | HUF | –42638662,00 | 0,00 | –42638662,00 |

Total HU | –3644733968,56 | 0,00 | –3644733968,56 |

IE | Cross-compliance | 2006 | Non-respect of Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –707810,71 | 0,00 | –707810,71 |

IE | Cross-compliance | 2007 | Non-respect of Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –7117,53 | 0,00 | –7117,53 |

Total IE | –714928,24 | 0,00 | –714928,24 |

IT | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2003 | Weaknesses in physical checks | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –620190,92 | 0,00 | –620190,92 |

IT | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2003 | Payments made for sugar imported from the Balkans | one-off | | EUR | –38460,42 | 0,00 | –38460,42 |

IT | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2004 | Weaknesses in physical checks | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –521176,14 | 0,00 | –521176,14 |

IT | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2004 | Payments made for sugar imported from the Balkans | one-off | | EUR | –149226,45 | 0,00 | –149226,45 |

IT | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2005 | Weaknesses in physical checks | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –7075,80 | 0,00 | –7075,80 |

IT | Fruit and vegetables — Citrus processing | 2005 | Various control weaknesses comprising insufficient quality of administrative, accounting and on-the-spot controls performed | flat rate | 5 | EUR | –2434173,33 | 0,00 | –2434173,33 |

IT | Fruit and vegetables — Citrus processing | 2006 | Various control weaknesses comprising insufficient quality of administrative, accounting and on-the-spot controls performed | flat rate | 5 | EUR | –1105506,48 | 0,00 | –1105506,48 |

IT | Irregularities | 2008 | Reimbursement concerning irregularity cases | one-off | | EUR | 44226,30 | 0,00 | 44226,30 |

IT | Olive oil — Restitution conserves | 2003 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision given by SAISA paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –52085,75 | 0,00 | –52085,75 |

IT | Olive oil — Restitution conserves | 2004 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision given by SAISA paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –220175,36 | 0,00 | –220175,36 |

IT | Olive oil — Restitution conserves | 2005 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision given by SAISA paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –213470,02 | 0,00 | –213470,02 |

IT | Olive oil — Restitution conserves | 2006 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision given by SAISA paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –85920,81 | 0,00 | –85920,81 |

IT | Olive oil — Restitution conserves | 2007 | Insufficient control instructions and supervision given by SAISA paying agency resulting in inappropriate quality and quantity of controls | flat rate | 2 | EUR | –2378,19 | 0,00 | –2378,19 |

Total IT | –5405613,38 | 0,00 | –5405613,38 |

LT | Direct payments | 2005 | Weaknesses in LPIS system and on-the-spot checks and insufficient control of GAEC | flat rate | 2 | LTL | –8187386,50 | 0,00 | –8187386,50 |

LT | Direct payments | 2006 | Weaknesses in LPIS system and on-the-spot checks and insufficient control of GAEC | flat rate | 2 | LTL | –329,75 | 0,00 | –329,75 |

Total LT | –8187716,25 | 0,00 | –8187716,25 |

LU | Direct payments | 2006 | Wrong calculation of the rights for single-area payments using improper regional average | one-off | | EUR | –3834,18 | 0,00 | –3834,18 |

LU | Direct payments | 2007 | Wrong calculation of the rights for single-area payments using improper regional average | one-off | | EUR | –513,28 | 0,00 | –513,28 |

Total LU | –4347,46 | 0,00 | –4347,46 |

MT | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2007 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | | EUR | –16690,38 | –16690,38 | 0,00 |

Total MT | –16690,38 | –16690,38 | 0,00 |

NL | Direct payments | 2006 | Weaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, in administrative and on-the-spot checks and in the application of the regulatory sanctions | one-off | | EUR | –5538453,00 | 0,00 | –5538453,00 |

NL | Direct payments | 2007 | Weaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, in administrative and on-the-spot checks and in the application of the regulatory sanctions | one-off | | EUR | –5866224,00 | 0,00 | –5866224,00 |

NL | Direct payments | 2008 | Weaknesses in the LPIS-GIS, in administrative and on-the-spot checks and in the application of the regulatory sanctions | one-off | | EUR | –5226404,00 | 0,00 | –5226404,00 |

NL | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2001 | Insufficient quantity of substitution checks in customs offices in Rotterdam district | flat-rate | 10 | EUR | –392282,80 | 0,00 | –392282,80 |

NL | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2002 | Insufficient quantity of substitution checks in customs offices in Rotterdam district | flat-rate | 10 | EUR | –5601293,13 | 0,00 | –5601293,13 |

NL | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2003 | Insufficient quantity of substitution checks in customs offices in Rotterdam district | flat-rate | 10 | EUR | –1215943,72 | 0,00 | –1215943,72 |

NL | Export refunds and food aid outside the EU | 2001 | Insufficient quantity of substitution checks in customs offices in Rotterdam district | flat-rate | 10 | EUR | –137829,09 | 0,00 | –137829,09 |

NL | Export refunds and food aid outside the EU | 2002 | Insufficient quantity of substitution checks in customs offices in Rotterdam district | flat-rate | 10 | EUR | –1968021,91 | 0,00 | –1968021,91 |

NL | Export refunds and food aid outside the EU | 2003 | Insufficient quantity of substitution checks in customs offices in Rotterdam district | flat-rate | 10 | EUR | –427223,47 | 0,00 | –427223,47 |

NL | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2006 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | | EUR | –1871229,37 | 0,00 | –1871229,37 |

Total NL | –28244904,49 | 0,00 | –28244904,49 |

PL | Rural Development EAGGF Axis 2 (2000-2006, area related measures) | 2005 | No cross-checks with animal database performed until the end of 2005. Poor quality of control reports. Not all agri-enviromental commitments checked. Lack of sanctions | flat-rate | 5 | PLN | –47152775,00 | 0,00 | –47152775,00 |

Total PL | –47152775,00 | 0,00 | –47152775,00 |

PT | Certification | 2001 | Most likely error of overpayments | one-off | | EUR | –2073170,00 | –2848206,87 | 775036,87 |

PT | Certification | 2002 | Most likely error of overpayments | one-off | | EUR | –1768014,18 | 0,0 | –1768014,18 |

PT | Certification | 2002 | Systematic error | one-off | | EUR | –455084,30 | 0,0 | –455084,30 |

PT | Certification | 2003 | Most likely error of overpayments | one-off | | EUR | –2056200,00 | 0,0 | –2056200,00 |

PT | Certification | 2004 | Most likely error of overpayments | one-off | | EUR | –226000,00 | 0,0 | –226000,00 |

PT | Certification | 2005 | Most likely error of overpayments | one-off | | EUR | –2147000,00 | 0,0 | –2147000,00 |

PT | Certification | | Recoveries already reimbursed to the Community budget with regards to certification 2001-2005 | one-off | | EUR | 134701,72 | 0,0 | 134701,72 |

PT | Cross-compliance | 2006 | Controls performed too late | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –727228,53 | 0,0 | –727228,53 |

PT | Cross-compliance | 2007 | Controls performed too late | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –1952,69 | 0,0 | –1952,69 |

PT | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2003 | Minimum number of substitution checks in 2003 not reached in two customs offices | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –16434,84 | 0,0 | –16434,84 |

PT | Export refunds — Sugar and isoglucose | 2004 | Minimum number of substitution checks in 2003 not reached in two customs offices | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –28112,11 | 0,0 | –28112,11 |

PT | RD Guarantee Accompanying Measures (area related measures) | 2004 | Wrong sample selection for on-the spot checks and their limited scope not assuring minimum 5 % of beneficiaries checked annually | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –1264084,00 | 0,0 | –1264084,00 |

PT | RD Guarantee Accompanying Measures (area related measures) | 2005 | Wrong sample selection for on-the spot checks and their limited scope not assuring minimum 5 % of beneficiaries checked annually | flat-rate | 2 | EUR | –1399863,00 | 0,0 | –1399863,00 |

Total PT | –12028441,93 | –2848206,87 | –9180235,06 |

SI | Financial audit — Late payments | 2007 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | | EUR | –11173,87 | –11173,87 | 0,0 |

SI | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2007 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | | EUR | –14688,91 | –14688,91 | 0,0 |

Total SI | –25862,78 | –25862,78 | 0,0 |

BUDGET ITEM 6711

MS | Measure | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |

DE | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007 DE06RPO 020) | 2007 | Absence of cross-checks with central livestock databank in case of applications for agri-environmental measures with livestock density limitation as an eligibility condition | flat-rate | 5 | EUR | –350800,00 | 0,0 | –350800,00 |

Total DE | –350800,00 | 0,0 | –350800,00 |

--------------------------------------------------